• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用自填式工具评估非正式照护者的需求:文献综述。

Assessment of informal caregiver's needs by self-administered instruments: a literature review.

机构信息

Fondation France Répit, Lyon, France.

Clinical Research and Innovation Department Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2017 Oct 1;27(5):796-801. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx103.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckx103
PMID:28957482
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinicians, researchers and politicians are seeking to better assess caregiver's needs. Challenges exist in broadly implementing this so as to provide appropriate support. The aim of this review was to compile self-administered instruments for assessment of caregiver's needs that are deemed to be scientifically robust.

METHODS

The Medline database was searched for publications reporting self-administered instruments assessing caregiver's needs with acceptable psychometric properties. These instruments were analyzed in terms of the development context, target population, concept, purpose, structure, content and psychometric properties. The dimensions of the needs were listed and categorized.

RESULTS

A total of nine self-administered instruments were analyzed. They averaged 32 items, they were specifically developed for a targeted subpopulation of caregivers and dedicated to epidemiological research. Response devices were based on Likert scales. The main dimensions of the needs identified were 'Health and Care', 'Psychological - Emotional Support', 'Information-Knowledge', 'Social Life-Work-Finance'. None was specifically geared toward caregivers for the elderly, children or teenagers. In the absence of transcultural validation, no instrument was directly usable in Europe.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessing caregivers' needs is a key part in providing caregivers with appropriate support. The development of self-administered instruments constitutes a complex field that is still underexplored at the international level; strict specifications with psychometric validation are essential. To be efficient, the instrument should be integrated in a larger process including: upstream, recognition, identification and assessment of the overall situation of the caregiver; and downstream, guidance, establishment and follow-up of a suitable action plan.

摘要

背景

临床医生、研究人员和政策制定者正在寻求更好地评估照顾者的需求。在广泛实施这一评估方法以提供适当的支持方面存在挑战。本综述的目的是编制被认为具有科学可靠性的照顾者需求自我评估工具。

方法

在 Medline 数据库中搜索报告具有可接受心理测量特性的自我评估照顾者需求的工具。从发展背景、目标人群、概念、目的、结构、内容和心理测量特性等方面对这些工具进行了分析。列出并分类了需求的维度。

结果

共分析了 9 种自我评估工具。它们平均有 32 个项目,专门为有针对性的照顾者亚人群开发,致力于进行流行病学研究。反应装置基于李克特量表。确定的需求的主要维度是“健康和护理”、“心理 - 情感支持”、“信息 - 知识”、“社会生活 - 工作 - 财务”。没有一个工具专门针对老年人、儿童或青少年的照顾者。在没有跨文化验证的情况下,没有一种工具可以直接在欧洲使用。

结论

评估照顾者的需求是为照顾者提供适当支持的关键部分。自我评估工具的开发是一个复杂的领域,在国际层面上仍未得到充分探索;严格的规范和心理测量验证至关重要。为了提高效率,该工具应整合到一个更大的过程中,包括:上游,识别、确定和评估照顾者的整体情况;下游,指导、制定和跟进合适的行动计划。

相似文献

1
Assessment of informal caregiver's needs by self-administered instruments: a literature review.使用自填式工具评估非正式照护者的需求:文献综述。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Oct 1;27(5):796-801. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx103.
2
[Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].[精神分裂症患者亲属的照顾者负担:测量工具概述]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):137-47.
3
Psychometric properties and relations with coping and family strain of the Health Services and Caregiver Experience questionnaire (HSCE): an outcome measure of informal caregivers' experience for inpatient care in Italy.健康服务与照顾者体验问卷(HSCE)的心理测量特性及其与应对方式和家庭压力的关系:意大利住院护理中非正式照顾者体验的一项结果测量指标
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 17;17(1):494. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2317-x.
4
Assessing the needs of informal caregivers to cancer survivors: a review of the instruments.评估癌症幸存者非正式照料者的需求:工具综述
Psychooncology. 2015 Feb;24(2):121-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.3609. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
5
[A preliminary validation of a new French instrument to assess quality of life for caregivers of patients suffering from schizophrenia].[一种用于评估精神分裂症患者照料者生活质量的新型法语工具的初步验证]
Encephale. 2011 Dec;37(6):425-32. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
6
Perseverance time of informal caregivers for people with dementia: construct validity, responsiveness and predictive validity.痴呆症患者非正式照料者的坚持时间:结构效度、反应性和预测效度。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017 Apr 4;9(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13195-017-0251-0.
7
Adaptation of a scale to measure coping strategies in informal primary caregivers of psychiatric patients.一种用于测量精神病患者非正式主要照料者应对策略的量表的改编。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Oct;24(8):563-569. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12403. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
8
Care for the caregivers: a review of self-report instruments developed to measure the burden, needs, and quality of life of informal caregivers.关爱照护者:对为衡量非正式照护者的负担、需求和生活质量而开发的自我报告工具的综述。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003 Oct;26(4):922-53. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(03)00327-0.
9
Psychometric validation of the French version of the Supportive Care Needs Survey for Partners and Caregivers of cancer patients.癌症患者伴侣及照护者支持性照护需求调查问卷法语版的心理测量学验证
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Jan;28(1):e12896. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12896. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
10
The development of a comprehensive needs assessment tool for cancer-caregivers in patient-caregiver dyads.开发一种综合性的癌症患者及其照顾者需求评估工具。
Psychooncology. 2011 Dec;20(12):1342-52. doi: 10.1002/pon.1857. Epub 2010 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the needs of family caregivers of patients attending an outpatient palliative care clinic: an explanatory sequential mixed methods pilot study.评估门诊姑息治疗诊所患者家庭照顾者的需求:一项解释性序列混合方法试点研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Aug 29;33(9):819. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09890-z.
2
A study protocol for a pragmatic pre-post trial to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of a novel co-designed service to support health and wellbeing of older carers of older people.一项实用的前后对照试验的研究方案,旨在确定一种新的共同设计服务对支持老年人老年照料者的健康和福祉的可行性和有效性。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0326363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326363. eCollection 2025.
3
Sleep quality, anxiety, and depression among perioperative caregivers of children with tethered cord syndrome: a cross-sectional survey analysis.
脊髓拴系综合征患儿围手术期照料者的睡眠质量、焦虑和抑郁:一项横断面调查分析
Front Pediatr. 2025 Apr 23;13:1580053. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1580053. eCollection 2025.
4
Development of a brief screening measure of unmet supportive care needs (SCNS-P&C-6) in caregivers of people with high-grade glioma.高级别胶质瘤患者照料者未满足的支持性护理需求简短筛查量表(SCNS-P&C-6)的开发
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Jan 10;9(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00835-4.
5
Considerations of equity in the development of tools that identify and respond to end-of-life carer support needs: a scoping review protocol.在开发识别和应对临终护理者支持需求工具过程中对公平性的考量:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 3;14(12):e085922. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085922.
6
Construction of a Home Hospice Care Program for Older Adults at the End of Life with Chronic Diseases in China: A Delphi Method.构建中国慢性病终末期老年患者居家临终关怀方案:德尔菲法。
Clin Interv Aging. 2024 Oct 29;19:1731-1751. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S477877. eCollection 2024.
7
Self-Assessment Instruments for Supporting Family Caregivers: An Integrative Review.支持家庭照顾者的自我评估工具:一项综合综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 14;12(10):1016. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12101016.
8
Assessing the needs of informal caregivers of patients with chronic non-communicable diseases: A systematic review of self-assessment tools.评估慢性非传染性疾病患者的非正式照护者的需求:自我评估工具的系统评价。
Nurs Open. 2023 Dec;10(12):7467-7486. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2008. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
9
Quality of Life and Needs in Caregivers: Results From the Prospective Multicentric Open-Label Randomized Study of Informal Caregivers of Elderly Patients.生活质量和护理人员需求:来自对老年患者非专业护理人员的前瞻性多中心开放性随机研究的结果。
Int J Public Health. 2023 Aug 30;68:1605459. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605459. eCollection 2023.
10
Objective Burden and Emotional Distress of Parents of Children with Type 1 Diabetes.目的 1 型糖尿病患儿父母的负担和情绪困扰。
Horm Res Paediatr. 2024;97(3):225-232. doi: 10.1159/000531885. Epub 2023 Jul 13.