Berry Kalen P, Nedivi Elly
Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Neuron. 2017 Sep 27;96(1):43-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.08.008.
Since Cajal's first drawings of Golgi stained neurons, generations of researchers have been fascinated by the small protrusions, termed spines, studding many neuronal dendrites. Most excitatory synapses in the mammalian CNS are located on dendritic spines, making spines convenient proxies for excitatory synaptic presence. When in vivo imaging revealed that dendritic spines are dynamic structures, their addition and elimination were interpreted as excitatory synapse gain and loss, respectively. Spine imaging has since become a popular assay for excitatory circuit remodeling. In this review, we re-evaluate the validity of using spine dynamics as a straightforward reflection of circuit rewiring. Recent studies tracking both spines and synaptic markers in vivo reveal that 20% of spines lack PSD-95 and are short lived. Although they account for most spine dynamics, their remodeling is unlikely to impact long-term network structure. We discuss distinct roles that spine dynamics can play in circuit remodeling depending on synaptic content.
自从卡哈尔首次绘制经高尔基染色的神经元图以来,一代又一代的研究人员一直着迷于许多神经元树突上密布的小突起,即树突棘。哺乳动物中枢神经系统中的大多数兴奋性突触位于树突棘上,这使得树突棘成为兴奋性突触存在的便利替代物。当体内成像显示树突棘是动态结构时,它们的增加和消除分别被解释为兴奋性突触的获得和丧失。从那时起,树突棘成像就成为了一种研究兴奋性回路重塑的常用方法。在这篇综述中,我们重新评估了将树突棘动态变化作为回路重新布线直接反映的有效性。最近在体内追踪树突棘和突触标记物的研究表明,20%的树突棘缺乏PSD - 95且寿命较短。尽管它们占了大多数树突棘动态变化,但它们的重塑不太可能影响长期的网络结构。我们讨论了根据突触内容,树突棘动态变化在回路重塑中可能发挥的不同作用。