1 Center for Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
2 Brain Research Center, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Cephalalgia. 2018 Jun;38(7):1296-1306. doi: 10.1177/0333102417733953. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
Objective Entropy-based approaches to understanding the temporal dynamics of complexity have revealed novel insights into various brain activities. Herein, electroencephalogram complexity before migraine attacks was examined using an inherent fuzzy entropy approach, allowing the development of an electroencephalogram-based classification model to recognize the difference between interictal and preictal phases. Methods Forty patients with migraine without aura and 40 age-matched normal control subjects were recruited, and the resting-state electroencephalogram signals of their prefrontal and occipital areas were prospectively collected. The migraine phases were defined based on the headache diary, and the preictal phase was defined as within 72 hours before a migraine attack. Results The electroencephalogram complexity of patients in the preictal phase, which resembled that of normal control subjects, was significantly higher than that of patients in the interictal phase in the prefrontal area (FDR-adjusted p < 0.05) but not in the occipital area. The measurement of test-retest reliability (n = 8) using the intra-class correlation coefficient was good with r1 = 0.73 ( p = 0.01). Furthermore, the classification model, support vector machine, showed the highest accuracy (76 ± 4%) for classifying interictal and preictal phases using the prefrontal electroencephalogram complexity. Conclusion Entropy-based analytical methods identified enhancement or "normalization" of frontal electroencephalogram complexity during the preictal phase compared with the interictal phase. This classification model, using this complexity feature, may have the potential to provide a preictal alert to migraine without aura patients.
目的 基于信息熵的方法来理解复杂性的时间动态,为各种大脑活动提供了新的见解。在此,采用固有模糊熵方法研究偏头痛发作前的脑电图复杂性,从而开发一种基于脑电图的分类模型来识别间歇期和发作前期之间的差异。
方法 招募了 40 例无先兆偏头痛患者和 40 例年龄匹配的正常对照者,并前瞻性采集其前额叶和枕叶的静息态脑电图信号。根据头痛日记定义偏头痛发作期,将发作前期定义为偏头痛发作前 72 小时内。
结果 与正常对照组相比,发作前期患者(类似于正常对照组)的脑电图复杂性在前额区显著升高(FDR 校正 p < 0.05),但在枕叶区则没有升高。采用组内相关系数进行测试-重测可靠性测量(n = 8),r1 为 0.73(p = 0.01),结果良好。此外,使用前额叶脑电图复杂性的支持向量机分类模型在分类间歇期和发作前期方面表现出最高的准确性(76 ± 4%)。
结论 基于熵的分析方法发现,与间歇期相比,发作前期前额叶脑电图复杂性增强或“正常化”。该分类模型使用这种复杂性特征,可能有潜力为无先兆偏头痛患者提供发作前预警。