• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国严重过敏反应的风险因素。

Risk factors for severe anaphylaxis in the United States.

作者信息

Motosue Megan S, Bellolio M Fernanda, Van Houten Holly K, Shah Nilay D, Campbell Ronna L

机构信息

Division of Allergic Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017 Oct;119(4):356-361.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.07.014.

DOI:10.1016/j.anai.2017.07.014
PMID:28958375
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anaphylaxis is an acute systemic allergic reaction and may be life-threatening.

OBJECTIVE

To assess risk factors associated with severe and near-fatal anaphylaxis in a large observational cohort study.

METHODS

We analyzed administrative claims data from Medicare Advantage and privately insured enrollees in the United States from 2005 to 2014. Severe anaphylaxis was defined as anaphylaxis resulting in hospital or intensive care unit (ICU) admission, requiring endotracheal intubation, or meeting criteria for near-fatal anaphylaxis.

RESULTS

Of 38,695 patients seen in the emergency department for anaphylaxis during the study period, 4,431 (11.5%) required hospitalization, 2,057 (5.3%) were admitted to the ICU, 567 (1.5%) required endotracheal intubation, and 174 (0.45%) were classified as having a near-fatal episode. Multivariable analysis revealed that medication-related anaphylaxis (odds ratio [OR], 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-1.63; P < .001), age of 65 years or older (OR, 3.15; 95% CI, 2.88-3.44; P < .001), and the presence of cardiac disease (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.50-1.63; P < .001) or lung disease (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.16-1.30; P < .001) were associated with increased odds of severe anaphylaxis requiring any hospital admission, ICU admission, or intubation or being a near-fatal reaction.

CONCLUSION

In this large contemporary cohort study, 11.6% of patients had severe anaphylaxis. Age of 65 years or older, medication as a trigger, and presence of comorbid conditions (specifically cardiac and lung disease) were associated with significantly higher odds of severe anaphylaxis. Additional studies examining risk factors for severe anaphylaxis are needed to define risk assessment strategies and establish a framework for management.

摘要

背景

过敏反应是一种急性全身性过敏反应,可能危及生命。

目的

在一项大型观察性队列研究中评估与严重及近乎致命的过敏反应相关的危险因素。

方法

我们分析了2005年至2014年美国医疗保险优势计划和私人参保者的管理索赔数据。严重过敏反应被定义为导致住院或入住重症监护病房(ICU)、需要气管插管或符合近乎致命过敏反应标准的过敏反应。

结果

在研究期间因过敏反应到急诊科就诊的38,695例患者中,4,431例(11.5%)需要住院治疗,2,057例(5.3%)入住ICU,567例(1.5%)需要气管插管,174例(0.45%)被归类为发生近乎致命的发作。多变量分析显示,药物相关过敏反应(比值比[OR],1.50;95%置信区间[CI],1.38 - 1.63;P <.001)、65岁及以上年龄(OR,3.15;95% CI,2.88 - 3.44;P <.001)以及存在心脏病(OR,1.56;95% CI,1.50 - 1.63;P <.001)或肺病(OR,1.23;95% CI,1.16 - 1.30;P <.001)与需要任何住院治疗、入住ICU、插管或发生近乎致命反应的严重过敏反应几率增加相关。

结论

在这项大型当代队列研究中,11.6%的患者发生了严重过敏反应。65岁及以上年龄、药物作为触发因素以及存在合并症(特别是心脏病和肺病)与严重过敏反应的几率显著升高相关。需要进一步研究严重过敏反应的危险因素,以确定风险评估策略并建立管理框架。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for severe anaphylaxis in the United States.美国严重过敏反应的风险因素。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017 Oct;119(4):356-361.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.07.014.
2
Anaphylaxis risk factors for hospitalization and intensive care: A comparison between adults and children in an upstate New York emergency department.住院及重症监护的过敏反应风险因素:纽约州北部急诊科成人与儿童的比较
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2019 Jan 1;40(1):41-47. doi: 10.2500/aap.2019.40.4189.
3
Risk factors for severe anaphylaxis in patients receiving anaphylaxis treatment in US emergency departments and hospitals.美国急诊科和医院接受过敏治疗患者中严重过敏反应的风险因素。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Nov;134(5):1125-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.05.018. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
4
Retrospective study of drug-induced anaphylaxis treated in the emergency department or hospital: patient characteristics, management, and 1-year follow-up.回顾性研究在急诊科或医院治疗的药物性过敏反应:患者特征、处理方法和 1 年随访。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;2(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
5
Evaluation of Prehospital Management in a Canadian Emergency Department Anaphylaxis Cohort.评价加拿大急诊部门过敏反应队列的院前管理。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Sep-Oct;7(7):2232-2238.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.04.018. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
6
Risk factors for recurrent anaphylaxis-related emergency department visits in the United States.美国复发性过敏反应相关急诊就诊的风险因素。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018 Dec;121(6):717-721.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.08.021. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
7
Outcomes of Emergency Department Anaphylaxis Visits from 2005 to 2014.2005 年至 2014 年急诊科过敏反应就诊的结果。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 May-Jun;6(3):1002-1009.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.07.041. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
8
Predictors of Repeat Epinephrine Administration for Emergency Department Patients with Anaphylaxis.预测急诊过敏反应患者重复肾上腺素给药的因素。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 Jul-Aug;3(4):576-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.04.009. Epub 2015 May 29.
9
Clinical Profile of Patients With Severe Anaphylaxis Hospitalized in the Spanish Hospital System: 1997-2011.1997 - 2011年西班牙医院系统中重度过敏反应住院患者的临床概况
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2017;27(2):111-126. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0146. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
10
Epinephrine use and outcomes in anaphylaxis patients transported by emergency medical services.由紧急医疗服务转运的过敏反应患者使用肾上腺素的情况及预后
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;32(9):1097-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.05.014. Epub 2014 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of food allergy reaction severity: biomarkers and host factors.食物过敏反应严重程度的预测:生物标志物与宿主因素
Front Allergy. 2025 Aug 13;6:1578601. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2025.1578601. eCollection 2025.
2
Characteristics and Outcomes of Anaphylaxis in Emergency Department Visits Among Older Adults.老年人急诊科就诊时过敏反应的特征与结局
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2025 Aug;13(8):2014-2024.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2025.04.023. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
3
A retrospective registry-based study into the proportion of patients admitted to intensive care who have anaphylaxis as a principal diagnosis and their outcomes in Australia and New Zealand.
一项基于登记处的回顾性研究,探究在澳大利亚和新西兰,以过敏反应作为主要诊断入住重症监护病房的患者比例及其治疗结果。
Crit Care Resusc. 2024 Aug 3;26(3):185-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.06.002. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Allergic asthma is a risk factor for human cardiovascular diseases.过敏性哮喘是人类心血管疾病的一个风险因素。
Nat Cardiovasc Res. 2022 May;1(5):417-430. doi: 10.1038/s44161-022-00067-z. Epub 2022 May 16.
5
Hospitalizations for Food-Induced Anaphylaxis Between 2016 and 2021: Population-Based Epidemiologic Study.2016 年至 2021 年食物诱导性过敏反应住院治疗情况:基于人群的流行病学研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Aug 27;10:e57340. doi: 10.2196/57340.
6
Improving Care at Emergency Department Discharge for Pediatric Patients with Anaphylaxis Using a Quality Improvement Framework.使用质量改进框架改善急诊科对过敏性反应儿科患者出院时的护理。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2022 Sep 8;7(5):e589. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000589. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
7
Anaphylactic deaths: A retrospective study of forensic autopsy cases from 2009 to 2019 in Shanghai, China.过敏性死亡:对2009年至2019年中国上海法医尸检案例的回顾性研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 12;10(6):e28049. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28049. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
8
Trends in Anaphylaxis Hospitalizations among Adults in Spain and Their Relationship with Asthma-Analysis of Hospital Discharge data from 2016 to 2021.西班牙成年人过敏性休克住院情况及其与哮喘的关系——对2016年至2021年医院出院数据的分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Nov 22;11(23):3016. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11233016.
9
Trends and Hospital Outcomes in HOSPITAL Admissions for Anaphylaxis in Children with and without Asthma in Spain (2016-2021).西班牙有和没有哮喘的儿童过敏性反应住院治疗的趋势及医院治疗结果(2016 - 2021年)
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 6;12(19):6387. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196387.
10
Overview of Allergy and Anaphylaxis.过敏和过敏反应概述。
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2023 Aug;43(3):435-451. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2022.10.009.