Suppr超能文献

成人烹饪和家庭食品准备干预措施的影响:系统评价(2011-2016 年)。

Impact of Cooking and Home Food Preparation Interventions Among Adults: A Systematic Review (2011-2016).

机构信息

Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN.

Library Science, University of Minnesota Libraries, St. Paul, MN.

出版信息

J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 Feb;50(2):148-172.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Sep 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To update a review of the impact of interventions for adults that included a cooking component on diet, health, and psychosocial outcomes.

DESIGN

A total of 3,047 records were identified by searching MEDLINE, Agricola, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (January, 2011 to March, 2016). A total of 34 articles met inclusion and exclusion criteria for analysis. Study description and outcomes were extracted and synthesized to generate conclusions regarding impact.

RESULTS

Less than half of the studies included a control group. The most common intended outcomes were improvements in fruit and/or vegetable intake and weight. The majority of studies showed positive dietary behavior changes and improvements in cooking confidence and knowledge. Limitations included the lack of a control group, no follow-up past after intervention, the use of nonvalidated assessment instruments, and small convenience samples.

DISCUSSION

Findings were similar to a previous review regarding positive impact on dietary and cooking confidence outcomes. Clinical and weight outcomes were addressed in more studies included in the current review than in the previous 1; however, limitations were similar.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Intervention design and assessment tools need to be strengthened in intervention studies with cooking components.

摘要

目的

更新一项针对包含烹饪内容的成人干预措施对饮食、健康和心理社会结果影响的综述。

设计

通过检索 MEDLINE、Agricola、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(2011 年 1 月至 2016 年 3 月),共确定了 3047 条记录。共有 34 篇文章符合纳入和排除标准,可用于分析。提取并综合了研究描述和结果,以得出关于影响的结论。

结果

不到一半的研究包含对照组。最常见的预期结果是改善水果和/或蔬菜摄入量和体重。大多数研究显示出积极的饮食行为改变以及烹饪信心和知识的提高。局限性包括缺乏对照组、干预后无随访、使用非验证评估工具以及小样本便利性。

讨论

研究结果与之前一项关于对饮食和烹饪信心结果有积极影响的综述相似。当前综述中纳入的研究比之前的研究更关注临床和体重结果;然而,局限性相似。

结论和意义

烹饪干预研究中需要加强干预设计和评估工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验