Illinois Neurological Institute Stroke Network, Sisters of the Third Order of St. Francis Healthcare System, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, Illinois, USA.
Southwest Hospital Stroke Center, Third Military University of Medical Sciences, Chongqing, China.
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2016 Jun 24;1(2):29-36. doi: 10.1136/svn-2016-000008. eCollection 2016 Jun.
The aim of this study was to explore the difference between haemorrhagic events among those patients on either aspirin or aspirin plus clopidogrel who were enrolled in the Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients with Acute Non-disabling Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events (CHANCE) trial.
This was an ad hoc analysis of the CHANCE trial; data on all patients with any haemorrhagic event were reviewed and analysed. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine factors association with any bleeding.
In the CHANCE trial, there were a total of 101 (2%) haemorrhagic events reported from 50 different hospitals. The clopidogrel-aspirin group had 60 (2.3%) cases and the aspirin group had 41 (1.6%, p=0.09). Moderate or severe haemorrhagic events occurred in 7 patients (0.3%) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group and in 8 (0.3%) in the aspirin group (p=0.73). Of 36 (0.7%) cases of intracranial haemorrhages, 20 (0.4%) were in the clopidogrel-aspirin group and 16 (0.3%) in the aspirin group. Each group had 8 (0.3%) cases of symptomatic haemorrhagic strokes. Other common haemorrhagic events included 24 (0.5%) cases of skin bruises, 13 (0.3%) gastrointestinal haemorrhages, 9 (0.2%) gum haemorrhages and 8 (0.2%) intraocular haemorrhages.
There was no overall significant difference in haemorrhagic events (p=0.29), especially in the rate of intracranial haemorrhages between the 2 treatment groups. However, patients enrolled with minor strokes had an increased risk of haemorrhagic events regardless of treatment group, not seen in patients with high-risk transient ischaemic attacks. Being elderly, of male gender and with a history of aspirin or proton pump inhibitor usage were associated with increased risk of haemorrhage. Patients with higher body mass index had lower risk of haemorrhagic events.
NCT00979589.
本研究旨在探讨接受阿司匹林或阿司匹林加氯吡格雷治疗的患者中出血事件的差异,这些患者均来自于急性非致残性缺血性脑血管事件高危患者氯吡格雷治疗(CHANCE)试验。
这是一项对 CHANCE 试验的专门分析;对所有发生任何出血事件的患者的数据进行了回顾和分析。使用 Cox 比例风险回归来确定与任何出血相关的因素。
在 CHANCE 试验中,来自 50 家不同医院的共报告了 101 例(2%)出血事件。氯吡格雷-阿司匹林组有 60 例(2.3%),阿司匹林组有 41 例(1.6%,p=0.09)。氯吡格雷-阿司匹林组有 7 例(0.3%)发生中度或重度出血事件,阿司匹林组有 8 例(0.3%)(p=0.73)。36 例(0.7%)颅内出血中,氯吡格雷-阿司匹林组有 20 例(0.4%),阿司匹林组有 16 例(0.3%)。每组均有 8 例(0.3%)症状性脑出血。其他常见出血事件包括 24 例(0.5%)皮肤瘀伤、13 例(0.3%)胃肠道出血、9 例(0.2%)牙龈出血和 8 例(0.2%)眼内出血。
两组治疗之间的出血事件(p=0.29),特别是颅内出血发生率无总体显著差异。然而,无论治疗组如何,患有小中风的患者发生出血事件的风险增加,而高危短暂性脑缺血发作患者则没有这种情况。年龄较大、男性、有阿司匹林或质子泵抑制剂使用史与出血风险增加相关。体重指数较高的患者出血事件风险较低。
NCT00979589。