The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 52 Meihua East Road, Zhuhai City, Guangdong Province, China.
BMC Neurol. 2024 Mar 1;24(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03585-4.
Ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) are the most prevalent cerebrovascular diseases. The conventional antiplatelet drugs are associated with an inherent bleeding risk, while indobufen is a new antiplatelet drug and has the similar mechanism of antiplatelet aggregation as aspirin with more safety profile. However, there have been no studies evaluating the combination therapy of indobufen and clopidogrel for antiplatelet therapy in cerebrovascular diseases.
The CARMIA study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of a new dual antiplatelet therapy consisting of indobufen and clopidogrel comparing with the conventional dual antiplatelet therapy consisting of aspirin and clopidogrel in patients with minor ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA.
An open-label randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at a clinical center. We randomly assigned patients who had experienced a minor stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 72 h of onset, or within 1 month if they had intracranial stenosis (IS), to receive either indobufen 100 mg twice daily or aspirin 100 mg once daily for 21 days. For patients with IS, the treatment duration was extended to 3 months. All patients received a loading dose of 300 mg clopidogrel orally on the first day, followed by 75 mg once daily from the second day to 1 year. We collected prospective data using paper-based case report forms, and followed up on enrolled patients was conducted to assess the incidence of recurrent ischemic stroke or TIA, mRS score, NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) score, and any bleeding events occurring within 3 month after onset.
We enrolled 202 patients diagnosed with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. After applying the criteria, 182 patients were eligible for data analysis. Endpoint events (recurrence of ischemic stroke/TIA, myocardial infarction, or death) were observed in 6 patients (6.5%) receiving aspirin and clopidogrel, including 4 (4.3%) with stroke recurrence, 1 (1.1%) with TIA recurrence, and 1 (1%) with death. In contrast, no endpoint events were reported in the indobufen and clopidogrel group (P = 0.029). The group of patients receiving indobufen and clopidogrel exhibited significantly lower modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. (scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating more severe disability) compared to the aspirin and clopidogrel group (common odds ratio 3.629, 95% CI 1.874-7.036, P < 0.0001). Although the improvement rate of NIHSS score in the indobufen and clopidogrel group was higher than that in the aspirin and clopidogrel group, the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Bleeding events were observed in 8 patients (8.6%) receiving aspirin and clopidogrel, including 4 (4.3%) with skin bleeding, 2 (2.2%) with gingival bleeding, 1 (1.1%) with gastrointestinal bleeding, and 1 (1.1%) with urinary system bleeding. On the other hand, only 1 patient (1.1%) in the indobufen and clopidogrel group experienced skin bleeding (P = 0.035).
The combination of indobufen and clopidogrel has shown non-inferior and potentially superior effectiveness and safety compared to aspirin combined with clopidogrel in patients with minor ischemic stroke and high-risk TIA in the CARMIA study (registered under chictr.org.cn with registration number ChiCTR2100043087 in 01/02/2021).
缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)是最常见的脑血管疾病。传统的抗血小板药物存在固有出血风险,而吲哚布芬是一种新型抗血小板药物,其抗血小板聚集的机制与阿司匹林相似,但安全性更高。然而,目前还没有研究评估吲哚布芬和氯吡格雷联合抗血小板治疗在脑血管疾病中的疗效。
CARMIA 研究旨在评估新型双联抗血小板治疗(吲哚布芬联合氯吡格雷)与传统双联抗血小板治疗(阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷)在小卒中或高危 TIA 患者中的疗效和安全性。
在一个临床中心进行了一项开放性随机对照临床试验。我们将在发病后 72 小时内或颅内狭窄(IS)患者发病后 1 个月内发生小卒中或 TIA 的患者随机分配接受吲哚布芬 100mg,每日 2 次或阿司匹林 100mg,每日 1 次,持续 21 天。对于 IS 患者,治疗时间延长至 3 个月。所有患者在第 1 天接受 300mg 氯吡格雷负荷剂量,第 2 天开始每日口服 75mg,持续 1 年。我们使用纸质病例报告表收集前瞻性数据,并对入组患者进行随访,以评估复发性缺血性卒中和 TIA、mRS 评分、NIHSS(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表)评分和发病后 3 个月内任何出血事件的发生率。
我们共纳入了 202 例诊断为缺血性卒中和 TIA 的患者。在应用标准后,182 例患者符合数据分析条件。阿司匹林和氯吡格雷组发生终点事件(复发性缺血性卒中和 TIA、心肌梗死或死亡)6 例(6.5%),其中 4 例(4.3%)为卒中复发,1 例(1.1%)为 TIA 复发,1 例(1%)为死亡。相比之下,吲哚布芬和氯吡格雷组无终点事件报告(P=0.029)。吲哚布芬和氯吡格雷组的改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分明显低于阿司匹林和氯吡格雷组(评分范围为 0 至 6,分数越高表示残疾越严重)(常见比值比 3.629,95%CI 1.874-7.036,P<0.0001)。虽然吲哚布芬和氯吡格雷组的 NIHSS 评分改善率高于阿司匹林和氯吡格雷组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。阿司匹林和氯吡格雷组有 8 例(8.6%)患者发生出血事件,包括 4 例(4.3%)皮肤出血,2 例(2.2%)牙龈出血,1 例(1.1%)胃肠道出血,1 例(1.1%)泌尿系统出血。另一方面,吲哚布芬和氯吡格雷组只有 1 例(1.1%)患者发生皮肤出血(P=0.035)。
在 CARMIA 研究中,与阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷相比,吲哚布芬联合氯吡格雷在小卒中和高危 TIA 患者中显示出非劣效性和潜在的优越性,且安全性相当(在中国临床试验注册中心注册,注册号 ChiCTR2100043087,于 2021 年 1 月 2 日注册)。