Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Center of Stroke, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China.
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2016 Dec 19;1(4):147-153. doi: 10.1136/svn-2016-000024. eCollection 2016 Dec.
Hyperperfusion syndrome (HPS) is a rare but potentially a life-threatening complication after carotid artery angioplasty and stenting (CAS). Staged CAS has been an alternative to prevent HPS.
44 of 908 patients with high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis or near occlusion were at risk of HPS because of poor collateral flow and impaired cerebral blood flow (CBF). They were treated with first (stage 1), followed by a full CAS (stage 2) 1 month later. Their 30-day outcomes were tabulated and analysed.
During follow-up, 1 of the 44 (2.2%) patients developed HPS immediately, 3 (7%) had postprocedural HPS (ie, transcranial Doppler (TCD) >120%) without clinical symptoms and 3 (7%) required stenting at stage 1 for carotid dissections. After stage 1, there were significant improvement between the preprocedural and postprocedural CBF (0.98±0.06 vs 0.85±0.05, p<0.05), mean transit time (MTT; 1.05±0.05 vs 1.15±0.05, p<0.05), time to peak (TTP; 1.04±0.06 vs 1.20±0.06, p<0.05) on CT perfusion (CTP), and CBF (66.41±7.41 vs 44.44±6.43, p<0.05) on TCD. After stage 2, improvement was seen in CBF (1.01±0.07 vs 0.98±0.06, p<0.05), MTT (1.01±0.05 vs 1.05±0.05, p<0.05), TTP (0.99±0.06 vs 1.04±0.06, p<0.05) on CTP and CBF (66.41±7.41 vs 93.78±18.81, p<0.05) on TCD. 2 had postoperative increase of middle cerebral artery mean flow velocity of 120% after stage 2 without clinical symptoms.
Staged carotid artery stenting probably decreased the chance of developing HPS in this group of selected patients. Although requiring a 2-step intervention, staged CAS may be a safe and effective alternative.
高灌注综合征(HPS)是颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术(CAS)后的一种罕见但潜在危及生命的并发症。分期 CAS 是预防 HPS 的一种替代方法。
908 例重度颈内动脉狭窄或接近闭塞的患者中,有 44 例(4.9%)由于侧支循环不良和脑血流(CBF)受损而有发生 HPS 的风险。对这些患者进行了分期 CAS 治疗,首先进行一期(阶段 1),一个月后再进行完全 CAS(阶段 2)。记录并分析了他们的 30 天结果。
在随访期间,44 例患者中有 1 例(2.2%)立即发生 HPS,3 例(7%)有术后 HPS(即经颅多普勒(TCD)>120%)而无临床症状,3 例(7%)在阶段 1 时因颈动脉夹层需要支架置入术。在阶段 1 后,CT 灌注(CTP)上的 CBF(0.98±0.06 比 0.85±0.05,p<0.05)、平均通过时间(MTT;1.05±0.05 比 1.15±0.05,p<0.05)、峰值时间(TTP;1.04±0.06 比 1.20±0.06,p<0.05)和 TCD 上的 CBF(66.41±7.41 比 44.44±6.43,p<0.05)有显著改善。在阶段 2 后,CBF(1.01±0.07 比 0.98±0.06,p<0.05)、MTT(1.01±0.05 比 1.05±0.05,p<0.05)、TTP(0.99±0.06 比 1.04±0.06,p<0.05)在 CTP 上和 CBF(66.41±7.41 比 93.78±18.81,p<0.05)在 TCD 上均有改善。有 2 例患者在阶段 2 后出现 MCA 平均流速增加 120%,但无临床症状。
在这组选定的患者中,分期颈动脉支架置入术可能降低了发生 HPS 的机会。尽管需要两步干预,但分期 CAS 可能是一种安全有效的替代方法。