Suppr超能文献

四种粘结水门汀抗压强度及吸附/溶解性的评估

Evaluation of Compressive Strength and Sorption/Solubility of Four Luting Cements.

作者信息

Ms Tavangar, D Jafarpur, R Bagheri

机构信息

Department of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Student Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

J Dent Biomater. 2017 Jun;4(2):387-393.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Compressive strength (CS) and sorption/solubility of the luting cements are two associated factors. Searching a correlation between sorption/solubility and compressive strength of various luting cements is required.

OBJECTIVES

To measure the water sorption/solubility, and compressive strength of three resin-based and one conventional glass ionomer (CGI) luting cement after 1 and 24 h of immersion in distilled water and to determine if there is any correlation between those properties found.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four luting cements were investigated. For each material, 10 disc shaped specimens were prepared for measuring the sorption/solubility. The specimens were cured according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the sorption/solubility were measured in accordance with the ISO 4049's. For testing the compression strength, for each material 16 cylindrical specimens were prepared by insertion of cements into a stainless steel split mould. The specimens were cured, divided into groups of 8, and then stored in distilled water at (37 ± 1)°C for 1 and 24 h. The test was performed using the universal testing machine, the maximum load was recorded and CS was calculated. The data were analysed using SPSS software version 18. One-way ANOVA, Tukey's test and Pearson's correlation coefficient were performed.

RESULTS

G-CEM had the highest mean CS (153.60± 25.15) and CGI luting had the lowest CS (21.36±5.37) ( <0.001). After 24 h, mean CS values showed an increase for almost all materials except for RelyXTM U200 which showed a slight reduction. However, no statistically significant difference was founded (all > 0.05). The lowest mean sorption/solubility value was for RelyX U200 and Panavia F, and the highest for CGI luting (all < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The compressive strength of all cements did not necessarily increase after 24 h and varied depending on the materials. There was a strong reverse correlation between sorption and CS values after both 1 and 24 h immersion. It may be practical for clinician to use those cements with the less sorption / solubility and more stable compression strength over time.

摘要

问题陈述

粘结水门汀的抗压强度(CS)与吸附/溶解度是两个相关因素。需要探究各种粘结水门汀的吸附/溶解度与抗压强度之间的相关性。

目的

测量三种树脂基粘结水门汀和一种传统玻璃离子(CGI)粘结水门汀在蒸馏水中浸泡1小时和24小时后的吸水/溶解度及抗压强度,并确定这些性能之间是否存在相关性。

材料与方法

研究了四种粘结水门汀。对于每种材料,制备10个圆盘形试件用于测量吸附/溶解度。试件按照制造商的说明固化,并根据ISO 4049进行吸附/溶解度测量。为测试抗压强度,每种材料通过将水门汀插入不锈钢分体模具中制备16个圆柱形试件。试件固化后,分成每组8个,然后在(37±1)℃的蒸馏水中储存1小时和24小时。使用万能试验机进行测试,记录最大载荷并计算抗压强度。使用SPSS软件18版对数据进行分析。进行单因素方差分析、Tukey检验和Pearson相关系数分析。

结果

G-CEM的平均抗压强度最高(153.60±25.15),CGI粘结剂的抗压强度最低(21.36±5.37)(<0.001)。24小时后,除RelyXTM U200略有降低外,几乎所有材料的平均抗压强度值均有所增加。然而,未发现统计学上的显著差异(所有p>0.05)。RelyX U200和Panavia F的平均吸附/溶解度值最低,CGI粘结剂的最高(所有p<0.001)。

结论

所有水门汀在24小时后的抗压强度不一定增加,且因材料而异。浸泡1小时和24小时后,吸附与抗压强度值之间均存在强烈的负相关。对于临床医生来说,使用吸附/溶解度较小且抗压强度随时间更稳定的水门汀可能是可行的。

相似文献

3
Impact of bleaching agents on water sorption and solubility of resin luting cements.
J Investig Clin Dent. 2017 Aug;8(3). doi: 10.1111/jicd.12224. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
6
A Comparative Evaluation of Sorption, Solubility, and Compressive Strength of Three Different Glass Ionomer Cements in Artificial Saliva: An Study.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017 Jan-Mar;10(1):49-54. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1407. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
7
Evaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materials.
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Aug 25;13(17):2851. doi: 10.3390/polym13172851.
9
Sorption and solubility characteristics of self-adhesive resin cements.
Dent Mater. 2012 Oct;28(10):e187-98. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.037. Epub 2012 May 17.
10
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Luting Cements to Different Core Buildup Materials in Lactic Acid Buffer Solution.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Aug;9(8):ZC84-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12333.6372. Epub 2015 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of cementation protocols on the fracture load of bilayer ceramic crowns manufactured by the Rapid Layer Technology.
Braz Dent J. 2024 Sep 16;35:e245917. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202405917. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparative study of physical-chemical properties of bioactive glass ionomer cement.
Braz Dent J. 2024 Mar 22;35:e245728. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202405728. eCollection 2024.
6
In vitro cytotoxicity of different dental resin-cements on human cell lines.
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2021 Jan 20;32(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s10856-020-06471-w.
8
Choice of cement for single-unit crowns: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2019 Jun;150(6):522-530. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2019.01.021. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

本文引用的文献

4
Effect of G-Coat Plus on the mechanical properties of glass-ionomer cements.
Aust Dent J. 2013 Dec;58(4):448-53. doi: 10.1111/adj.12122.
5
Effect of storage media and time on the fracture toughness of resin-based luting cements.
Aust Dent J. 2012 Sep;57(3):349-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01703.x. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
6
Considerations for proper selection of dental cements.
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2012 Jan;33(1):28-30, 32, 34-5; quiz 36, 38.
7
Comparison of the effect of storage media on shear punch strength of resin luting cements.
J Dent. 2010 Oct;38(10):820-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.06.014. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
8
Mechanical properties of new self-adhesive resin-based cement.
J Prosthodont Res. 2010 Apr;54(2):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2009.09.004. Epub 2009 Oct 30.
9
Sorption and solubility of luting cements in different solutions.
Dent Mater J. 2008 Sep;27(5):702-9. doi: 10.4012/dmj.27.702.
10
Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review.
J Adhes Dent. 2008 Aug;10(4):251-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验