Ms Tavangar, D Jafarpur, R Bagheri
Department of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Student Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
J Dent Biomater. 2017 Jun;4(2):387-393.
Compressive strength (CS) and sorption/solubility of the luting cements are two associated factors. Searching a correlation between sorption/solubility and compressive strength of various luting cements is required.
To measure the water sorption/solubility, and compressive strength of three resin-based and one conventional glass ionomer (CGI) luting cement after 1 and 24 h of immersion in distilled water and to determine if there is any correlation between those properties found.
Four luting cements were investigated. For each material, 10 disc shaped specimens were prepared for measuring the sorption/solubility. The specimens were cured according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the sorption/solubility were measured in accordance with the ISO 4049's. For testing the compression strength, for each material 16 cylindrical specimens were prepared by insertion of cements into a stainless steel split mould. The specimens were cured, divided into groups of 8, and then stored in distilled water at (37 ± 1)°C for 1 and 24 h. The test was performed using the universal testing machine, the maximum load was recorded and CS was calculated. The data were analysed using SPSS software version 18. One-way ANOVA, Tukey's test and Pearson's correlation coefficient were performed.
G-CEM had the highest mean CS (153.60± 25.15) and CGI luting had the lowest CS (21.36±5.37) ( <0.001). After 24 h, mean CS values showed an increase for almost all materials except for RelyXTM U200 which showed a slight reduction. However, no statistically significant difference was founded (all > 0.05). The lowest mean sorption/solubility value was for RelyX U200 and Panavia F, and the highest for CGI luting (all < 0.001).
The compressive strength of all cements did not necessarily increase after 24 h and varied depending on the materials. There was a strong reverse correlation between sorption and CS values after both 1 and 24 h immersion. It may be practical for clinician to use those cements with the less sorption / solubility and more stable compression strength over time.
粘结水门汀的抗压强度(CS)与吸附/溶解度是两个相关因素。需要探究各种粘结水门汀的吸附/溶解度与抗压强度之间的相关性。
测量三种树脂基粘结水门汀和一种传统玻璃离子(CGI)粘结水门汀在蒸馏水中浸泡1小时和24小时后的吸水/溶解度及抗压强度,并确定这些性能之间是否存在相关性。
研究了四种粘结水门汀。对于每种材料,制备10个圆盘形试件用于测量吸附/溶解度。试件按照制造商的说明固化,并根据ISO 4049进行吸附/溶解度测量。为测试抗压强度,每种材料通过将水门汀插入不锈钢分体模具中制备16个圆柱形试件。试件固化后,分成每组8个,然后在(37±1)℃的蒸馏水中储存1小时和24小时。使用万能试验机进行测试,记录最大载荷并计算抗压强度。使用SPSS软件18版对数据进行分析。进行单因素方差分析、Tukey检验和Pearson相关系数分析。
G-CEM的平均抗压强度最高(153.60±25.15),CGI粘结剂的抗压强度最低(21.36±5.37)(<0.001)。24小时后,除RelyXTM U200略有降低外,几乎所有材料的平均抗压强度值均有所增加。然而,未发现统计学上的显著差异(所有p>0.05)。RelyX U200和Panavia F的平均吸附/溶解度值最低,CGI粘结剂的最高(所有p<0.001)。
所有水门汀在24小时后的抗压强度不一定增加,且因材料而异。浸泡1小时和24小时后,吸附与抗压强度值之间均存在强烈的负相关。对于临床医生来说,使用吸附/溶解度较小且抗压强度随时间更稳定的水门汀可能是可行的。