Di Franco Antonino, Kim Jiwon, Rodriguez-Diego Sara, Khalique Omar, Siden Jonathan Y, Goldburg Samantha R, Mehta Neil K, Srinivasan Aparna, Ratcliffe Mark B, Levine Robert A, Crea Filippo, Devereux Richard B, Weinsaft Jonathan W
Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York, United States of America.
Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 29;12(9):e0185657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185657. eCollection 2017.
Ischemic mitral regurgitation (iMR) predisposes to right ventricular (RV) pressure and volume overload, providing a nidus for RV dysfunction (RVDYS) and non-ischemic fibrosis (NIF). Echocardiography (echo) is widely used to assess iMR, but performance of different indices as markers of RVDYS and NIF is unknown.
iMR patients prospectively underwent echo and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) within 72 hours. Echo quantified iMR, assessed conventional RV indices (TAPSE, RV-S', fractional area change [FAC]), and strain via speckle tracking in apical 4-chamber (global longitudinal strain [RV-GLS]) and parasternal long axis orientation (transverse strain). CMR volumetrically quantified RVEF, and assessed ischemic pattern myocardial infarction (MI) and septal NIF.
73 iMR patients were studied; 36% had RVDYS (EF<50%) on CMR among whom LVEF was lower, PA systolic pressure higher, and MI size larger (all p<0.05). CMR RVEF was paralleled by echo results; correlations were highest for RV-GLS (r = 0.73) and lowest for RV-S' (r = 0.43; all p<0.001). RVDYS patients more often had CMR-evidenced NIF (54% vs. 7%; p<0.001). Whereas all RV indices were lower among NIF-affected patients (all p≤0.006), percent change was largest for transverse strain (48.3%). CMR RVEF was independently associated with RV-GLS (partial r = 0.57, p<0.001) and transverse strain (r = 0.38, p = 0.002) (R = 0.78, p<0.001). Overall diagnostic performance of RV-GLS and transverse strain were similar (AUC = 0.93[0.87-0.99]|0.91[0.84-0.99], both p<0.001), and yielded near equivalent sensitivity and specificity (85%|83% and 80%|79% respectively).
Compared to conventional echo indices, RV strain parameters yield stronger correlation with CMR-defined RVEF and potentially constitute better markers of CMR-evidenced NIF in iMR.
缺血性二尖瓣反流(iMR)易导致右心室(RV)压力和容量超负荷,为右心室功能障碍(RVDYS)和非缺血性纤维化(NIF)提供病灶。超声心动图(echo)被广泛用于评估iMR,但不同指标作为RVDYS和NIF标志物的性能尚不清楚。
iMR患者在72小时内前瞻性地接受了echo和心脏磁共振成像(CMR)检查。echo对iMR进行定量,评估传统的右心室指标(三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移[TAPSE]、右心室侧壁组织速度[RV-S']、面积变化分数[FAC]),并通过斑点追踪在心尖四腔心切面(整体纵向应变[RV-GLS])和胸骨旁长轴切面(横向应变)评估应变。CMR对右心室射血分数(RVEF)进行容积定量,并评估缺血性心肌梗死(MI)模式和室间隔NIF。
对73例iMR患者进行了研究;36%的患者在CMR上存在RVDYS(射血分数<50%),其中左心室射血分数较低、肺动脉收缩压较高且心肌梗死面积较大(均p<0.05)。CMR的RVEF与echo结果平行;RV-GLS的相关性最高(r = 0.73),RV-S'的相关性最低(r = 0.43;均p<0.001)。RVDYS患者更常出现CMR证实的NIF(54%对7%;p<0.001)。在受NIF影响的患者中,所有右心室指标均较低(均p≤0.006),而横向应变的变化百分比最大(48.3%)。CMR的RVEF与RV-GLS(偏相关系数r = 0.57,p<0.001)和横向应变(r = 0.38,p = 0.002)独立相关(R = 0.78,p<0.001)。RV-GLS和横向应变的总体诊断性能相似(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.93[0.87 - 0.99]|0.91[0.84 - 0.99],均p<0.001),敏感性和特异性相近(分别为85%|83%和80%|79%)。
与传统的echo指标相比,右心室应变参数与CMR定义的RVEF相关性更强,可能是CMR证实的iMR中NIF的更好标志物。