Sobierajewicz Jagna, Przekoracka-Krawczyk Anna, Jaśkowski Wojciech, van der Lubbe Rob H J
Vision and Neuroscience Laboratory, NanoBioMedical Centre, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
Laboratory of Vision Science and Optometry, Faculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 85, 61-614, Poznan, Poland.
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Dec;235(12):3757-3769. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5096-z. Epub 2017 Sep 30.
The aim of the present study was twofold. First, we wanted to examine how effector specific the effect of sequence learning by motor execution is, and second, we wanted to compare this effect with learning by motor imagery. We employed a Go/NoGo discrete sequence production task in which in each trial a spatial sequence of five stimuli was presented. After a Go signal the corresponding spatial response sequence had to be executed, while after a NoGo signal, the response sequence had to be mentally imagined. For the training phase, participants were divided into two groups. In the index finger group, participants had to respond (physically or mentally) with the left or right index finger, while in the hand group they had to respond with four fingers of the left or right hand. In a final test phase both execution modes were compared and all trials had to be executed. Response times and the percentage of correct responses were determined to establish learning effects. Results showed that sequence learning effects as assessed in the test phase were independent of the effector used during the training phase. Results revealed the presence of aspecific learning effects in the case of learning a required motor task with an index finger, but sequence-specific learning effects, both due to motor execution and to motor imagery, were not effector specific.
本研究有两个目的。其一,我们想考察通过运动执行进行序列学习的效果在多大程度上具有效应器特异性;其二,我们想将这种效果与通过运动想象进行的学习相比较。我们采用了一个Go/NoGo离散序列生成任务,在每个试验中呈现一个由五个刺激组成的空间序列。在Go信号之后,必须执行相应的空间反应序列,而在NoGo信号之后,必须在脑海中想象反应序列。在训练阶段,参与者被分成两组。在食指组中,参与者必须用左手或右手食指做出(实际或想象中的)反应,而在手部组中,他们必须用左手或右手的四个手指做出反应。在最后的测试阶段,对两种执行模式进行比较,所有试验都必须执行。通过确定反应时间和正确反应的百分比来建立学习效果。结果表明,在测试阶段评估的序列学习效果与训练阶段使用的效应器无关。结果显示,在用食指学习所需运动任务的情况下存在非特异性学习效果,但由于运动执行和运动想象导致的序列特异性学习效果并非效应器特异性的。