Barry A L, Jones R N
Clinical Microbiology Institute, Tualatin, Oregon 97062.
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Apr;26(4):776-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.4.776-777.1988.
Tests with 100 anaerobic bacterial isolates demonstrated comparability between ceftriaxone MICs obtained with the reference agar dilution procedure and those obtained with a broth microdilution susceptibility testing procedure. The aerobically incubated thioglycolate disk elution test was also evaluated. Six 30-micrograms ceftriaxone disks in 5 ml of thioglycolate separated strains for which MICs were less than or equal to 32 micrograms/ml from those for which MICs were greater than or equal to 64 micrograms/ml (6% overall discrepancies). Quality control limits for ceftriaxone agar dilution tests were determined to be as follows: Bacteroides fragilis ATCC 25285, 32 to 128 micrograms/ml; and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron ATCC 29741, 64 to 256 micrograms/ml.
对100株厌氧菌分离株进行的测试表明,采用参考琼脂稀释法获得的头孢曲松最低抑菌浓度(MIC)与采用肉汤微量稀释药敏试验方法获得的结果具有可比性。还对需氧培养的硫乙醇酸盐纸片洗脱试验进行了评估。在5毫升硫乙醇酸盐中放置6片30微克的头孢曲松纸片,可将MIC小于或等于32微克/毫升的菌株与MIC大于或等于64微克/毫升的菌株区分开(总体差异为6%)。头孢曲松琼脂稀释试验的质量控制限度确定如下:脆弱拟杆菌ATCC 25285,32至128微克/毫升;以及多形拟杆菌ATCC 29741,64至256微克/毫升。