Kurzynski T A, Yrios J W, Helstad A G, Field C R
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Oct;10(4):727-32. doi: 10.1128/AAC.10.4.727.
The anaerobic broth disk (AnBD) method of Wilkins and Thiel and a new modification, designated the thioglycolate broth disk method, were compared with an agar dilution technique. The thioglycolate broth disk method was incubated aerobically (AeTBD) or anaerobically (AnTBD). One hundred anaerobic bacteria representing 15 species were tested with clindamycin, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, penicillin, and tetracycline. Agreement of results by the two methods with minimal inhibitory concentration determinations were: AnBD, 95.2%; AnTBD, 91.5%; AeTBD, 94.5%. With clindamycin, chloramphenicol, and penicillin, the agreement of the AeTBD and agar dilution results was 100%, 100%, and 95%, respectively. Using the AeTBD method, only 1.1% of all tests gave false susceptible readings, whereas 4.4% gave false resistant readings. All susceptibility testing errors occurred with tetracycline, erythromycin, and, to a lesser extent, penicillin. For each method, the changes in designation of bacteria as being susceptible or resistant to an antibiotic between trials primarily involved strains with minimal inhibitory concentrations which were +/- one dilution of the respective breakpoint value. The same situation was true for most bacteria that yielded false resistant readings within each trial. False resistant readings with tetracycline were determined to be unrelated to excess cation content of test media. These results reaffirm the reliability of the AnBD method and indicate that the AeTBD modification is equally reliable. The greater convenience and lower cost of the AeTBD method should make possible more widespread performance of susceptibility testing for anaerobic bacteria in hospital laboratories.
将威尔金斯和蒂尔的厌氧肉汤纸片法(AnBD)以及一种新的改良方法(称为硫乙醇酸盐肉汤纸片法)与琼脂稀释技术进行了比较。硫乙醇酸盐肉汤纸片法分别进行需氧培养(AeTBD)和厌氧培养(AnTBD)。用克林霉素、氯霉素、红霉素、青霉素和四环素对代表15个菌种的100株厌氧菌进行了测试。两种方法与最低抑菌浓度测定结果的一致性为:AnBD为95.2%;AnTBD为91.5%;AeTBD为94.5%。对于克林霉素、氯霉素和青霉素,AeTBD与琼脂稀释结果的一致性分别为100%、100%和95%。使用AeTBD方法,所有测试中只有1.1%给出了假敏感读数,而4.4%给出了假耐药读数。所有药敏试验误差均发生在四环素、红霉素以及程度较轻的青霉素检测中。对于每种方法,试验之间细菌对抗生素敏感或耐药的判定变化主要涉及最低抑菌浓度在各自折点值±一个稀释度范围内的菌株。每个试验中产生假耐药读数的大多数细菌情况也是如此。四环素的假耐药读数被确定与测试培养基中过量的阳离子含量无关。这些结果再次证实了AnBD方法的可靠性,并表明AeTBD改良方法同样可靠。AeTBD方法更大的便利性和更低的成本应使医院实验室更广泛地开展厌氧菌药敏试验成为可能。