Suppr超能文献

赛季中的高强度间歇训练可改善高中足球运动员的体能状况。

In-Season High-Intensity Interval Training Improves Conditioning In High School Soccer Players.

作者信息

Howard Neal, Stavrianeas Stasinos

机构信息

Department of Exercise Science, Willamette University, Salem, OR, USA.

出版信息

Int J Exerc Sci. 2017 Sep 1;10(5):713-720. doi: 10.70252/XFJU8567. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Soccer is characterized by high aerobic demands interspersed with frequent bursts of anaerobic activity. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is considered a viable alternative to traditional endurance conditioning and offers the additional time-saving benefits of anaerobic training. We hypothesized that HIIT will compare favorably to traditional (aerobic-based) soccer conditioning over the course of a high school soccer season. Junior varsity soccer players were split into control (CON, n=16) and experimental (HIIT, n=16) groups for the 10-week study. The HIIT group performed 4-6 "all-out" sprints lasting 30s each, with 4.5 minute recovery, 3 times a week. The CON group performed endurance running for the same duration. The groups did not differ in any other aspect of their training. Participants completed the Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test level 1 (IR1), a 40-yard dash, vertical jump, Illinois agility test, and a sit-and-reach test, in two different testing sessions (pre/post season). Both HIIT and CON groups exhibited significant increase in IR1 test performance with time (741.6±307.6m vs. 1067.6±356.8m, <.001 and 733.2±318.8m vs. 1165.2±252.8m, <0.001 respectively), with no difference between groups. The CON group demonstrated a significant difference in the 40-yard dash over time (5.48±0.36s vs. 5.21±0.16s, <0.004). While there was a difference in vertical jump between the pre and post tests for the HIIT group (42.20±7.04cm vs. 47.87±750cm respectively, <0.019), no such effect was observed in the CON group. In contrast, there were differences in the agility test only for the CON group over time (16.67±0.76s vs. 16.15±0.49s, <0.001). There were no differences in the flexibility test between groups. Our results indicate that HIIT offers similar endurance improvements to more traditional soccer training.

摘要

足球的特点是有氧需求高,且穿插着频繁的无氧活动爆发。高强度间歇训练(HIIT)被认为是传统耐力训练的可行替代方案,并且具有无氧训练节省时间的额外优势。我们假设在高中足球赛季期间,HIIT与传统(以有氧为主)的足球训练相比会有更好的效果。在为期10周的研究中,初中校队足球运动员被分为对照组(CON,n = 16)和实验组(HIIT,n = 16)。HIIT组每周进行3次4 - 6次“全力”冲刺,每次持续30秒,恢复4.5分钟。CON组进行相同时长的耐力跑。两组在训练的其他方面没有差异。参与者在两个不同的测试阶段(赛季前/后)完成了Yo - Yo间歇恢复测试1级(IR1)、40码短跑、垂直跳跃、伊利诺伊敏捷性测试和坐位体前屈测试。HIIT组和CON组的IR1测试成绩均随时间显著提高(分别为741.6±307.6米对1067.6±356.8米,<.00

1;733.2±318.8米对1165.2±252.8米,<0.001),两组之间无差异。CON组在40码短跑成绩上随时间有显著差异(5.4

8±0.36秒对5.21±0.16秒,<0.004)。虽然HIIT组在测试前和测试后的垂直跳跃有差异(分别为42.20±7.04厘米对47.87±7.50厘米,<0.019),但CON组未观察到这种效果。相比之下,只有CON组在敏捷性测试成绩上随时间有差异(16.67±0.76秒对16.15±0.49秒,<0.001)。两组在柔韧性测试中没有差异。我们的结果表明,HIIT与更传统的足球训练相比,在耐力提升方面效果相似。

相似文献

1
In-Season High-Intensity Interval Training Improves Conditioning In High School Soccer Players.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2017 Sep 1;10(5):713-720. doi: 10.70252/XFJU8567. eCollection 2017.
2
Effects of Two In-Season Short High-Intensity Interval Training Formats on Aerobic and Neuromuscular Performance in Young Soccer Players.
J Sports Sci Med. 2024 Dec 1;23(4):812-821. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2024.812. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
The Effects of a 6-Week Plyometric and Sprint Interval Training Intervention on Soccer Player's Physical Performance.
J Sports Sci Med. 2024 Sep 1;23(1):526-536. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2024.526. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
In-season adaptations to intense intermittent training and sprint interval training in sub-elite football players.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 May;29(5):669-677. doi: 10.1111/sms.13395. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
7
The effects of short term detraining and retraining on physical fitness in elite soccer players.
PLoS One. 2018 May 10;13(5):e0196212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196212. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

5
An 8-Week Program of Plyometrics and Sprints with Changes of Direction Improved Anaerobic Fitness in Young Male Soccer Players.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 4;18(19):10446. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910446.
6
Applicability of Field Aerobic Fitness Tests in Soccer: Which One to Choose?
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2021 Aug 18;6(3):69. doi: 10.3390/jfmk6030069.
8
Anaerobic Exercise Training in the Therapy of Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review.
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 4;9:644. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00644. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

2
Reliability, factorial validity, and interrelationships of five commonly used change of direction speed tests.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Jun;24(3):500-6. doi: 10.1111/sms.12019. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
3
Match running performance and fitness in youth soccer.
Int J Sports Med. 2010 Nov;31(11):818-25. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262838. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
4
Repeated-sprint ability in professional and amateur soccer players.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2009 Dec;34(6):1048-54. doi: 10.1139/H09-111.
5
The yo-yo test: reliability and association with a 20-m shuttle run and VO(2max).
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2006 Jun;1(2):137-49. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.1.2.137.
6
Metabolic adaptations to short-term high-intensity interval training: a little pain for a lot of gain?
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2008 Apr;36(2):58-63. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e318168ec1f.
8
Similar metabolic adaptations during exercise after low volume sprint interval and traditional endurance training in humans.
J Physiol. 2008 Jan 1;586(1):151-60. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.142109. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
9
Agility literature review: classifications, training and testing.
J Sports Sci. 2006 Sep;24(9):919-32. doi: 10.1080/02640410500457109.
10
Physiological and performance effects of generic versus specific aerobic training in soccer players.
Int J Sports Med. 2006 Jun;27(6):483-92. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-865839.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验