Howard Neal, Stavrianeas Stasinos
Department of Exercise Science, Willamette University, Salem, OR, USA.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2017 Sep 1;10(5):713-720. doi: 10.70252/XFJU8567. eCollection 2017.
Soccer is characterized by high aerobic demands interspersed with frequent bursts of anaerobic activity. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is considered a viable alternative to traditional endurance conditioning and offers the additional time-saving benefits of anaerobic training. We hypothesized that HIIT will compare favorably to traditional (aerobic-based) soccer conditioning over the course of a high school soccer season. Junior varsity soccer players were split into control (CON, n=16) and experimental (HIIT, n=16) groups for the 10-week study. The HIIT group performed 4-6 "all-out" sprints lasting 30s each, with 4.5 minute recovery, 3 times a week. The CON group performed endurance running for the same duration. The groups did not differ in any other aspect of their training. Participants completed the Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test level 1 (IR1), a 40-yard dash, vertical jump, Illinois agility test, and a sit-and-reach test, in two different testing sessions (pre/post season). Both HIIT and CON groups exhibited significant increase in IR1 test performance with time (741.6±307.6m vs. 1067.6±356.8m, <.001 and 733.2±318.8m vs. 1165.2±252.8m, <0.001 respectively), with no difference between groups. The CON group demonstrated a significant difference in the 40-yard dash over time (5.48±0.36s vs. 5.21±0.16s, <0.004). While there was a difference in vertical jump between the pre and post tests for the HIIT group (42.20±7.04cm vs. 47.87±750cm respectively, <0.019), no such effect was observed in the CON group. In contrast, there were differences in the agility test only for the CON group over time (16.67±0.76s vs. 16.15±0.49s, <0.001). There were no differences in the flexibility test between groups. Our results indicate that HIIT offers similar endurance improvements to more traditional soccer training.
足球的特点是有氧需求高,且穿插着频繁的无氧活动爆发。高强度间歇训练(HIIT)被认为是传统耐力训练的可行替代方案,并且具有无氧训练节省时间的额外优势。我们假设在高中足球赛季期间,HIIT与传统(以有氧为主)的足球训练相比会有更好的效果。在为期10周的研究中,初中校队足球运动员被分为对照组(CON,n = 16)和实验组(HIIT,n = 16)。HIIT组每周进行3次4 - 6次“全力”冲刺,每次持续30秒,恢复4.5分钟。CON组进行相同时长的耐力跑。两组在训练的其他方面没有差异。参与者在两个不同的测试阶段(赛季前/后)完成了Yo - Yo间歇恢复测试1级(IR1)、40码短跑、垂直跳跃、伊利诺伊敏捷性测试和坐位体前屈测试。HIIT组和CON组的IR1测试成绩均随时间显著提高(分别为741.6±307.6米对1067.6±356.8米,<.00
1;733.2±318.8米对1165.2±252.8米,<0.001),两组之间无差异。CON组在40码短跑成绩上随时间有显著差异(5.4
8±0.36秒对5.21±0.16秒,<0.004)。虽然HIIT组在测试前和测试后的垂直跳跃有差异(分别为42.20±7.04厘米对47.87±7.50厘米,<0.019),但CON组未观察到这种效果。相比之下,只有CON组在敏捷性测试成绩上随时间有差异(16.67±0.76秒对16.15±0.49秒,<0.001)。两组在柔韧性测试中没有差异。我们的结果表明,HIIT与更传统的足球训练相比,在耐力提升方面效果相似。