Kilit Bulent, Chmura Paweł, Arslan Ersan, Soylu Yusuf, Radziminski Łukasz
Faculty of Sport Sciences, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey.
Department of Team Games, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Wrocław, Poland; and.
J Strength Cond Res. 2025 Jan 1;39(1):86-93. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004955. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
Kilit, B, Chmura, P, Arslan, E, Soylu, Y, and Radziminski, Ł. Effects of 2 combined training protocols on the aerobic and anaerobic fitness, technical skills, and psychophysiological responses in young soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 39(1): 86-93, 2025-The study compared the effects of combining small-sided soccer games (SSGs) with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and repeated sprint training (RST) on aerobic and anaerobic fitness, technical skills, and psychophysiological responses in young soccer players. Thirty-two male, adolescent, soccer players (aged 13.5 ± 0.3 years) were randomly divided into either the SSGs + HIIT group ( n = 16) or the SSGs + RST group ( n = 16) for combined training 3 times per week for 6 weeks. The players in the SSGs + HIIT group performed 12-18 minutes of runs at intensities (90-95%), whereas the players in the SSGs + RST group consisted of 3-4 sets of 5-7 times 15-m shuttle sprints (all-out efforts). Both training groups played 4 bouts of 2-a-side or 4-a-side SSGs with various game formats at 2-day intervals. Psychophysiological responses were determined during and after all training sessions. Before and after training interventions, the following physical performance tests were used: 5- to 30-m sprint time, countermovement jump, triple-hop distance, zigzag agility with the ball and without the ball, repeated sprint ability (RSA), 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test, 3 corner run test, speed dribbling ability (SDA), Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1, and Y-balance test. Our main findings were that the SSGs + RST group demonstrated greater improvement in 5-m sprint time, SDA time, and RSA in the meantime compared with the SSGs + HIIT ( p ≤ 0.05, d values ranging from 1.50 to 2.25). Moreover, the SSGs + RST group showed greater improvement in agility test responses ( p ≤ 0.05, d values ranging from 2.13 to 2.34) than the SSGs + HIIT group. However, the SSGs + HIIT induced higher perceived exertion, mental effort, and lower greater physical enjoyment meaningfully compared with the SSGs + RST ( p ≤ 0.05, d values ranging from 6.04 to 6.67). In conclusion, these results demonstrate that the SSGs + RST is an effective training program to improve young soccer players' speed and agility-based performance responses.
基利特、B、赫穆拉、P、阿尔斯兰、E、索伊卢、Y和拉齐明斯基、Ł。两种联合训练方案对年轻足球运动员有氧和无氧体能、技术技能及心理生理反应的影响。《力量与体能研究杂志》39(1): 86 - 93,2025年。本研究比较了小场地足球比赛(SSGs)与高强度间歇训练(HIIT)及重复冲刺训练(RST)相结合对年轻足球运动员有氧和无氧体能、技术技能及心理生理反应的影响。32名男性青少年足球运动员(年龄13.5 ± 0.3岁)被随机分为SSGs + HIIT组(n = 16)或SSGs + RST组(n = 16),每周进行3次联合训练,共6周。SSGs + HIIT组的运动员以(90 - 95%)的强度进行12 - 18分钟的跑步,而SSGs + RST组由3 - 4组、每组5 - 7次15米穿梭冲刺(全力冲刺)组成。两个训练组均每隔2天进行4场不同比赛形式的2对2或4对4小场地足球比赛。在所有训练课程期间及之后测定心理生理反应。在训练干预前后,使用了以下身体性能测试:5至30米冲刺时间、反向纵跳、三级跳远距离、带球和不带球的之字形敏捷性、重复冲刺能力(RSA)、30 - 15间歇体能测试、3角跑测试、快速运球能力(SDA)、Yo - Yo间歇恢复测试1级和Y平衡测试。我们的主要发现是,与SSGs + HIIT组相比,SSGs + RST组在5米冲刺时间、SDA时间和RSA方面同时表现出更大的改善(p≤0.05,d值范围为1.50至2.25)。此外,SSGs + RST组在敏捷性测试反应方面比SSGs + HIIT组表现出更大的改善(p≤0.05,d值范围为2.13至2.34)。然而,与SSGs + RST组相比,SSGs + HIIT组明显引起更高的主观用力感、心理努力,且身体享受程度更低(p≤0.05,d值范围为6.04至6.67)。总之,这些结果表明,SSGs + RST是一个有效的训练方案,可改善年轻足球运动员基于速度和敏捷性的表现反应。