Doosti-Irani Amin, Mansournia Mohammad Ali, Rahimi-Foroushani Abbas, Haddad Peiman, Holakouie-Naieni Kourosh
Department of epidemiology, school of public health, Hamadan University of medical sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Department of epidemiology and biostatistics, school of public health, Tehran University of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran.
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 2;12(10):e0184784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184784. eCollection 2017.
Palliative treatments and stents are necessary for relieving dysphagia in patients with esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to simultaneously compare available treatments in terms of complications.
Web of Science, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the Chi2 test and was quantified by I2. The results of this study were summarized in terms of Risk Ratio (RR). The random effects model was used to report the results. The rank probability for each treatment was calculated using the p-score.
Out of 17855 references, 24 RCTs reported complications including treatment related death (TRD), bleeding, stent migration, aspiration, severe pain and fistula formation. In the ranking of treatments, thermal ablative therapy (p-score = 0.82), covered Evolution® stent (p-score = 0.70), brachytherapy (p-score = 0.72) and antireflux stent (p-score = 0.74) were better treatments in the network of TRD. Thermal ablative therapy (p-score = 0.86), the conventional stent (p-score = 0.62), covered Evolution® stent (p-score = 0.96) and brachytherapy (p-score = 0.82) were better treatments in the network of bleeding complications. Covered Evolution® (p-score = 0.78), uncovered (p-score = 0.88) and irradiation stents (p-score = 0.65) were better treatments in network of stent migration complications. In the network of severe pain, Conventional self-expandable nitinol alloy covered stent (p-score = 0.73), polyflex (p-score = 0.79), latex prosthesis (p-score = 0.96) and brachytherapy (p-score = 0.65) were better treatments.
According to our results, thermal ablative therapy, covered Evolution® stents, brachytherapy, and antireflux stents are associated with a lower risk of TRD. Moreover, thermal ablative therapy, conventional, covered Evolution® and brachytherapy had lower risks of bleeding. Overall, fewer complications were associated with covered Evolution® stent and brachytherapy.
姑息治疗和支架置入术对于缓解食管癌患者的吞咽困难是必要的。本研究的目的是同时比较现有治疗方法在并发症方面的情况。
检索了Web of Science、Medline、Scopus、Cochrane图书馆和Embase数据库。使用卡方检验评估统计异质性,并通过I²进行量化。本研究结果以风险比(RR)进行总结。采用随机效应模型报告结果。使用p值计算每种治疗方法的排序概率。
在17855篇参考文献中,24项随机对照试验报告了并发症,包括治疗相关死亡(TRD)、出血、支架移位、误吸、剧痛和瘘管形成。在治疗排序中,热消融治疗(p值 = 0.82)、覆膜Evolution®支架(p值 = 0.70)、近距离放射治疗(p值 = 0.72)和抗反流支架(p值 = 0.74)在TRD网络中是较好的治疗方法。热消融治疗(p值 = 0.86)、传统支架(p值 = 0.62)、覆膜Evolution®支架(p值 = 0.96)和近距离放射治疗(p值 = 0.82)在出血并发症网络中是较好的治疗方法。覆膜Evolution®支架(p值 = 0.78)、裸支架(p值 = 0.88)和照射支架(p值 = 0.65)在支架移位并发症网络中是较好的治疗方法。在剧痛网络中,传统自膨胀镍钛合金覆膜支架(p值 = 0.73)、聚氟乙烯支架(p值 = 0.79)、乳胶假体(p值 = 0.96)和近距离放射治疗(p值 = 0.65)是较好的治疗方法。
根据我们的结果,热消融治疗、覆膜Evolution®支架、近距离放射治疗和抗反流支架与较低的TRD风险相关。此外,热消融治疗、传统支架、覆膜Evolution®支架和近距离放射治疗的出血风险较低。总体而言,覆膜Evolution®支架和近距离放射治疗的并发症较少。