He Chao, Wang Bo, Wan Chun, Yang Ting, Shen Yongchun
Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Intensive Care Unit, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 6;8(38):64407-64416. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19041. eCollection 2017 Sep 8.
Malignant mesothelioma (MM) has become a global disease burden for its rising incidence and invariable fatality. D2-40 has been widely used as an immunostaining marker of diagnosing MM, while its diagnostic value has not yet been evaluated. Our study aimed to assess the overall accuracy of D2-40 immunostaining for diagnosing MM through a meta-analysis. A total of 22 studies with 2,264 participants were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane database. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of D2-40 for MM was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.84-0.89) and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.74-0.79), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve is 0.93, with a diagnostic odds ratio 40.37 (95% CI: 19.97-81.61). None of the study variates was found to be a source of heterogeneity after meta-regression analysis. In conclusion, D2-40 immunostaining may not give sufficient evidence by itself to diagnose MM and should be in combination with other markers to improve the accuracy of diagnosis.
恶性间皮瘤(MM)因其发病率上升和死亡率居高不下,已成为一种全球性的疾病负担。D2-40已被广泛用作诊断MM的免疫染色标志物,但其诊断价值尚未得到评估。我们的研究旨在通过荟萃分析评估D2-40免疫染色诊断MM的总体准确性。从PubMed、EMBASE、科学网、Scopus和Cochrane数据库中总共识别出22项研究,涉及2264名参与者。D2-40诊断MM的合并敏感度和特异度分别为0.86(95%CI:0.84-0.89)和0.77(95%CI:0.74-0.79)。汇总的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.93,诊断比值比为40.37(95%CI:19.97-81.61)。荟萃回归分析后未发现任何研究变量是异质性的来源。总之,D2-40免疫染色本身可能无法提供足够的证据来诊断MM,应与其他标志物联合使用以提高诊断准确性。