James Jesline Merly, Puranik Manjunath P, Sowmya K R
Postgraduate Student, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Government Dental College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Professor and Head, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Government Dental College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Aug;11(8):ZC06-ZC08. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/26442.10340. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
Dentinal hypersensitivity is an exaggerated response to non-noxious sensory stimuli (osmotic, thermal or mechanical changes). An inverse relationship between occluding open tubules and the intensity of sensitivity has been reported. Studies on the efficacy of potassium nitrate used in different forms and frequencies to occlude dentinal tubules are scarce.
To evaluate, in vitro the dentinal tubule occluding effect of potassium nitrate which differ in form, frequency and duration of application.
In an in vitro study, 45 extracted human maxillary and mandibular premolars were sectioned using diamond disc to obtain 90 samples which were treated with 6% citric acid and were randomly assigned to three groups: Group 1 was treated with potassium nitrate toothpaste (once and twice daily for two minutes); Group 2 with potassium nitrate mouthwash (once and twice daily for two minutes) and Group 3 served as control (distilled water). Post-treatment, the samples were immersed in distilled water. The samples were subjected to Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) at the end of 3, 7 and 14 days. SEM photographs were analysed based on extent of tubular occlusion. Chi-square test was applied to assess the significant difference between the groups.
There was detectable difference in the dentinal tubule occlusion at the end of 3, 7 and 14 day between three groups. When compared to the mouthwash, toothpaste yielded better results. Twice daily application for a period of two minutes each was better when compared to once daily for two minutes.
Potassium nitrate is effective in occluding dentinal tubules when applied twice daily in toothpaste form than mouthwash form. However, randomised control trials are needed to confirm its efficacy in human subjects.
牙本质过敏是对非伤害性感觉刺激(渗透压、温度或机械变化)的过度反应。据报道,封闭开放的牙本质小管与敏感程度之间呈负相关。关于不同形式和频率使用硝酸钾封闭牙本质小管的疗效研究较少。
在体外评估不同形式、频率和应用持续时间的硝酸钾对牙本质小管的封闭作用。
在一项体外研究中,使用金刚石切割盘将45颗拔除的人类上颌和下颌前磨牙切片,获得90个样本,用6%柠檬酸处理后随机分为三组:第1组用硝酸钾牙膏处理(每天一次和两次,每次两分钟);第2组用硝酸钾漱口水处理(每天一次和两次,每次两分钟),第3组作为对照组(蒸馏水)。处理后,将样本浸入蒸馏水中。在第3、7和14天结束时对样本进行扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查。根据牙本质小管封闭程度分析SEM照片。应用卡方检验评估各组之间的显著差异。
三组在第3、7和14天结束时牙本质小管封闭情况存在可检测到的差异。与漱口水相比,牙膏产生的效果更好。与每天一次两分钟相比,每天两次每次两分钟的应用效果更好。
硝酸钾以牙膏形式每天应用两次时比漱口水形式更有效地封闭牙本质小管。然而,需要随机对照试验来证实其在人体中的疗效。