Suppr超能文献

政策制定中的知识调动:通过参与式动态模拟建模实施系统方法

Knowledge mobilisation for policy development: implementing systems approaches through participatory dynamic simulation modelling.

作者信息

Freebairn Louise, Rychetnik Lucie, Atkinson Jo-An, Kelly Paul, McDonnell Geoff, Roberts Nick, Whittall Christine, Redman Sally

机构信息

ACT Government, Health Directorate, GPO Box 825, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.

The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, PO Box K617, Haymarket, NSW, 1240, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Oct 2;15(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0245-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based decision-making is an important foundation for health policy and service planning decisions, yet there remain challenges in ensuring that the many forms of available evidence are considered when decisions are being made. Mobilising knowledge for policy and practice is an emergent process, and one that is highly relational, often messy and profoundly context dependent. Systems approaches, such as dynamic simulation modelling can be used to examine both complex health issues and the context in which they are embedded, and to develop decision support tools.

OBJECTIVE

This paper reports on the novel use of participatory simulation modelling as a knowledge mobilisation tool in Australian real-world policy settings. We describe how this approach combined systems science methodology and some of the core elements of knowledge mobilisation best practice. We describe the strategies adopted in three case studies to address both technical and socio-political issues, and compile the experiential lessons derived. Finally, we consider the implications of these knowledge mobilisation case studies and provide evidence for the feasibility of this approach in policy development settings.

CONCLUSION

Participatory dynamic simulation modelling builds on contemporary knowledge mobilisation approaches for health stakeholders to collaborate and explore policy and health service scenarios for priority public health topics. The participatory methods place the decision-maker at the centre of the process and embed deliberative methods and co-production of knowledge. The simulation models function as health policy and programme dynamic decision support tools that integrate diverse forms of evidence, including research evidence, expert knowledge and localised contextual information. Further research is underway to determine the impact of these methods on health service decision-making.

摘要

背景

循证决策是卫生政策和服务规划决策的重要基础,但在决策过程中确保考虑到各种可用证据形式仍存在挑战。为政策和实践调动知识是一个新兴过程,是高度相关的,通常杂乱无章且严重依赖背景。系统方法,如动态模拟建模,可用于研究复杂的健康问题及其所处背景,并开发决策支持工具。

目的

本文报告了参与式模拟建模在澳大利亚现实世界政策环境中作为知识调动工具的新颖应用。我们描述了这种方法如何将系统科学方法与知识调动最佳实践的一些核心要素相结合。我们描述了三个案例研究中为解决技术和社会政治问题而采取的策略,并总结了经验教训。最后,我们考虑这些知识调动案例研究的影响,并为这种方法在政策制定环境中的可行性提供证据。

结论

参与式动态模拟建模建立在当代知识调动方法基础上,让卫生利益相关者合作并探索优先公共卫生主题的政策和卫生服务情景。参与式方法将决策者置于过程中心,并融入审议方法和知识的共同生产。模拟模型作为卫生政策和项目动态决策支持工具,整合了多种证据形式,包括研究证据、专家知识和本地化背景信息。正在进行进一步研究以确定这些方法对卫生服务决策的影响。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验