Suppr超能文献

肝硬化合并门静脉血栓形成:经颈静脉肝内门体分流术与内镜套扎加普萘洛尔预防食管静脉曲张再出血的随机试验。

Advanced Cirrhosis Combined with Portal Vein Thrombosis: A Randomized Trial of TIPS versus Endoscopic Band Ligation Plus Propranolol for the Prevention of Recurrent Esophageal Variceal Bleeding.

机构信息

From the Center of Interventional Radiology and Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Lane, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Radiology. 2015 Jul;276(1):286-93. doi: 10.1148/radiol.15141252. Epub 2015 Mar 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement with or without variceal embolization with endoscopic band ligation (EBL) plus propranolol in preventing recurrent esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with advanced cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present randomized controlled trial was approved by the ethics committee board of West China Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient. Between January 2010 and December 2012, 73 patients were randomly allocated to receive TIPS (n = 37) or EBL plus propranolol (n = 36). The comparisons of recurrent variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, and survival rates were based on the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 22.8 months ± 7.7(standard deviation) in the TIPS group and 20.9 months ± 8.9 in the EBL group. The 2-year probability of remaining free of recurrent variceal bleeding was higher in the TIPS group (77.8%) than in the EBL group (42.9%) (P = .002). Overall recanalization was achieved in 24 (64.9%) patients from the TIPS group and seven (19.4%) patients from the EBL group. The hepatic encephalopathy rates exhibited no significant differences between the two groups (P = .53). The 1- and 2-year probability of survival was 86.5% and 72.9%, respectively, in the TIPS group and 83.3% and 57.2%, respectively, in the EBL group, with no significant difference (P = .23).

CONCLUSION

TIPS was more effective than EBL plus propranolol in preventing recurrent esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with advanced cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis and did not increase the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy. Survival was similar in both groups.

摘要

目的

比较经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)联合与不联合曲张静脉栓塞内镜套扎(EBL)加普萘洛尔预防晚期肝硬化合并门静脉血栓患者食管静脉曲张再出血的效果。

材料与方法

本随机对照试验得到了华西医院伦理委员会的批准,每位患者均签署了书面知情同意书。2010 年 1 月至 2012 年 12 月,73 例患者被随机分配至 TIPS 组(n = 37)或 EBL 加普萘洛尔组(n = 36)。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法比较再出血、肝性脑病和生存率,并用对数秩检验进行比较。

结果

TIPS 组的中位随访时间为 22.8 个月±7.7(标准差),EBL 组为 20.9 个月±8.9。TIPS 组 2 年无再出血的累积概率(77.8%)高于 EBL 组(42.9%)(P =.002)。TIPS 组中有 24 例(64.9%)患者再通,EBL 组有 7 例(19.4%)患者再通。两组肝性脑病发生率无显著差异(P =.53)。TIPS 组 1 年和 2 年的生存率分别为 86.5%和 72.9%,EBL 组分别为 83.3%和 57.2%,两组间无显著差异(P =.23)。

结论

TIPS 预防晚期肝硬化合并门静脉血栓患者食管静脉曲张再出血的效果优于 EBL 加普萘洛尔,且不会增加肝性脑病的发生率。两组患者的生存率相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验