Davies Howard
European University Association, Avenue de l'Yser 24 Ijserlaan, Brussels B-1040, Belgium.
Pharmacy (Basel). 2017 Mar 26;5(2):17. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy5020017.
At the turn of the century European higher education policy became twin-track. The Bologna Process was launched and ran alongside developments in European legislation. Both tracks displayed a preoccupation with competences, in relation both to citizenship and to labour market needs. Scrutiny of important policy texts (Key Competences, the European Qualifications Framework, ECTS, the Bologna three-cycle degree structure) shows that 'competence' has never been given a precise and secure definition. Only very recently has the term entered the discourse of EU legislation on the recognition of professional qualifications. Current work on competence-based curricula in sectoral professions, including pharmacy, has helped bring the two policy tracks into closer alignment. The examples of competences identified in specific professional contexts can assist EU and Bologna policy-makers as they confront future challenges.
在世纪之交,欧洲高等教育政策形成了双轨制。博洛尼亚进程启动并与欧洲立法的发展并行。两条轨道都表现出对能力的关注,涉及公民身份和劳动力市场需求。对重要政策文本(关键能力、欧洲资格框架、欧洲学分转换系统、博洛尼亚三阶段学位结构)的审视表明,“能力”从未得到过精确且可靠的定义。直到最近,这个术语才进入欧盟关于专业资格认可的立法话语中。目前在包括药学在内的行业专业中基于能力的课程方面所做的工作,有助于使这两条政策轨道更加紧密地结合。在特定专业背景下确定的能力示例,可以在欧盟和博洛尼亚的政策制定者应对未来挑战时提供帮助。