Paleoanthropology, Senckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, 72070, Germany.
DFG Center for Advanced Studies 'Words, Bones, Genes, Tools', Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, 72070, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 2;7(1):12495. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12621-y.
Dental phenotypic data are often used to reconstruct biological relatedness among past human groups. Teeth are an important data source because they are generally well preserved in the archaeological and fossil record, even when associated skeletal and DNA preservation is poor. Furthermore, tooth form is considered to be highly heritable and selectively neutral; thus, teeth are assumed to be an excellent proxy for neutral genetic data when none are available. However, to our knowledge, no study to date has systematically tested the assumption of genetic neutrality of dental morphological features on a global scale. Therefore, for the first time, this study quantifies the correlation of biological affinities between worldwide modern human populations, derived independently from dental phenotypes and neutral genetic markers. We show that population relationship measures based on dental morphology are significantly correlated with those based on neutral genetic data (on average r = 0.574, p < 0.001). This relatively strong correlation validates tooth form as a proxy for neutral genomic markers. Nonetheless, we suggest caution in reconstructions of population affinities based on dental data alone because only part of the dental morphological variation among populations can be explained in terms of neutral genetic differences.
牙齿表型数据常用于重建过去人类群体之间的生物亲缘关系。牙齿是一个重要的数据来源,因为即使相关骨骼和 DNA 保存不佳,它们也通常能在考古和化石记录中得到很好的保存。此外,牙齿形态被认为具有高度的遗传性和选择性中性;因此,当没有可用的遗传数据时,牙齿被认为是中性遗传数据的极佳替代物。然而,据我们所知,迄今为止,没有研究在全球范围内系统地检验牙齿形态特征遗传中性的假设。因此,本研究首次定量评估了来自牙齿表型和中性遗传标记的全球现代人类群体之间生物亲缘关系的相关性。我们表明,基于牙齿形态的种群关系度量与基于中性遗传数据的度量显著相关(平均 r=0.574,p<0.001)。这种较强的相关性验证了牙齿形态作为中性基因组标记的替代物。尽管如此,我们建议在基于牙齿数据重建种群亲缘关系时要谨慎,因为只能根据中性遗传差异来解释人群之间牙齿形态变异的一部分。