Van Cappellen Patty, Fredrickson Barbara L, Saroglou Vassilis, Corneille Olivier
Duke University.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Pers Individ Dif. 2017 Jul 15;113:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.065. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
Although universal, the motivation to affiliate can vary as a function of individual differences and of the characteristics of the target. Three studies explored the extent to which religious beliefs and identity are related to social affiliation motivation. Because most religions advocate affiliation and provide opportunities for frequent experiences of affiliation, we reasoned that religious people might show greater affiliation motivation in everyday attitudes and behaviors. We found that religiosity was positively related to implicit and behavioral measures of general social affiliation (Studies 1 and 2). However, manipulating the identity of the affiliation target revealed that when affiliating might not lead to positive outcomes, the relation between religiosity and social affiliation disappeared (but did not reverse). In Studies 2 and 3, when the target of the affiliation was explicitly identified as a member of a threatening out-group (atheist), religiosity did not predict affiliation behaviors. We discuss the mechanisms by which religiosity motivates and constrains social affiliation and the potential implications for social influence and intergroup processes.
尽管归属动机普遍存在,但它会因个体差异和目标特征的不同而有所变化。三项研究探讨了宗教信仰和身份认同与社会归属动机的相关程度。由于大多数宗教提倡归属并提供频繁的归属体验机会,我们推断,宗教信徒在日常态度和行为中可能表现出更强的归属动机。我们发现,宗教虔诚度与一般社会归属的内隐和行为测量呈正相关(研究1和2)。然而,对归属目标的身份进行操纵后发现,当归属可能不会带来积极结果时,宗教虔诚度与社会归属之间的关系就消失了(但并未反转)。在研究2和3中,当归属目标被明确认定为威胁性外群体(无神论者)的成员时,宗教虔诚度并不能预测归属行为。我们讨论了宗教虔诚度激发和限制社会归属的机制,以及对社会影响和群体间过程的潜在影响。