Suppr超能文献

头孢曲松、头孢吡肟、强力霉素、环丙沙星和联合治疗创伤弧菌食源性败血症的疗效。

Efficacy of Ceftriaxone, Cefepime, Doxycycline, Ciprofloxacin, and Combination Therapy for Vibrio vulnificus Foodborne Septicemia.

机构信息

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Microbiology-Immunology, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Nov 22;61(12). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01106-17. Print 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Foodborne infections are associated with higher rates of sepsis and mortality than wound infections; however, antibiotic efficacy studies have not been performed in foodborne infection models. The efficacies of ceftriaxone, cefepime, doxycycline, ciprofloxacin, and combination therapy were assessed in intestinal infection in mice in order to model foodborne infections. In accordance with prior studies of cefotaxime, cefepime was synergistic with doxycycline and ciprofloxacin ; combination therapy significantly decreased bacterial growth, by ≥2 log units, from that with antibiotic monotherapy ( < 0.01). , survival rates in the ceftriaxone (50%), doxycycline (79%), and ciprofloxacin (80%) groups were significantly higher than those in the control group (0%) ( < 0.0001). Survival was significantly higher with ceftriaxone-doxycycline (91%) or ceftriaxone-ciprofloxacin (100%) therapy than with ceftriaxone (50%) ( ≤ 0.05). Survival with cefepime-doxycycline (96%) or cefepime-ciprofloxacin (90%) therapy was significantly higher than that with cefepime alone (20%) ( < 0.001). There was no difference in survival between the combination therapy groups. Thus, we conclude that combination therapy was the most effective treatment for foodborne septicemia. In a septic patient with a recent ingestion of raw seafood, cefepime in combination with doxycycline or ciprofloxacin should be initiated for coverage of resistant Gram-negative organisms and pending a microbiological diagnosis. Once a diagnosis of foodborne septicemia is established, treatment can safely transition to ceftriaxone in combination with doxycycline or ciprofloxacin.

摘要

食源性病原体感染比伤口感染更容易导致脓毒症和死亡率;然而,尚未在食源性病原体感染模型中进行抗生素疗效研究。为了模拟食源性感染,在小鼠的肠道感染中评估了头孢曲松、头孢吡肟、强力霉素、环丙沙星和联合治疗的疗效。与先前头孢噻肟的研究一致,头孢吡肟与强力霉素和环丙沙星具有协同作用;联合治疗可使细菌生长减少≥2 个对数单位,与抗生素单药治疗相比(<0.01)。头孢曲松(50%)、强力霉素(79%)和环丙沙星(80%)组的存活率明显高于对照组(0%)(<0.0001)。头孢曲松-强力霉素(91%)或头孢曲松-环丙沙星(100%)治疗的存活率明显高于头孢曲松(50%)(≤0.05)。头孢吡肟-强力霉素(96%)或头孢吡肟-环丙沙星(90%)治疗的存活率明显高于单独使用头孢吡肟(20%)(<0.001)。联合治疗组之间的存活率没有差异。因此,我们得出结论,联合治疗是治疗食源性败血症最有效的方法。对于近期摄入生海鲜的脓毒症患者,应开始使用头孢吡肟联合强力霉素或环丙沙星治疗,以覆盖耐药革兰氏阴性菌,并等待微生物学诊断。一旦确立食源性败血症的诊断,治疗可以安全地转换为头孢曲松联合强力霉素或环丙沙星。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Ceftriaxone, Cefepime, Doxycycline, Ciprofloxacin, and Combination Therapy for Vibrio vulnificus Foodborne Septicemia.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Nov 22;61(12). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01106-17. Print 2017 Dec.
3
Vibrio vulnificus infection: a persistent threat to public health.
Korean J Intern Med. 2018 Nov;33(6):1070-1078. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2018.159. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
4
In vivo efficacy of the combination of ciprofloxacin and cefotaxime against Vibrio vulnificus sepsis.
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 30;9(6):e101118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101118. eCollection 2014.
5
Synergy and Activity of Tigecycline-Ciprofloxacin Combination Therapy against Vibrio vulnificus Sepsis.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Sep 23;63(10). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00310-19. Print 2019 Oct.
6
Quantitative PCR and in vivo efficacy of antibiotics in the treatment of Vibrio vulnificus infection in a mouse model.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Sep;31(9):2461-7. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1592-z. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
7
Vibrio vulnificus meningoencephalitis in a patient with thalassemia and a splenectomy.
J Neurovirol. 2019 Feb;25(1):127-132. doi: 10.1007/s13365-018-0675-8. Epub 2018 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Early diagnosis and aggressive intervention in infection following live fish dorsal fin puncture: a case report.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 29;12:1593819. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1593819. eCollection 2025.
2
CLMT: graph contrastive learning model for microbe-drug associations prediction with transformer.
Front Genet. 2025 Mar 12;16:1535279. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1535279. eCollection 2025.
3
-A Review with a Special Focus on Sepsis.
Microorganisms. 2025 Jan 10;13(1):128. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13010128.
5
Heparin-Binding Protein Promotes Acute Lung Injury in Sepsis Mice by Blocking the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Signaling Pathway.
J Inflamm Res. 2024 May 13;17:2927-2938. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S454777. eCollection 2024.
6
infection from tilapia sting wounds in an inland city: A case report.
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 14;10(6):e28012. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28012. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
8
Detection of septic shock with ARDS using mNGS.
Open Life Sci. 2023 May 18;18(1):20220584. doi: 10.1515/biol-2022-0584. eCollection 2023.
10
[Two cases of primary sepsis].
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2022 Mar 20;38(3):276-280. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20201027-00448.

本文引用的文献

1
MARTX Toxin in the Zoonotic Serovar of Triggers an Early Cytokine Storm in Mice.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017 Jul 20;7:332. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00332. eCollection 2017.
3
Climate influence on Vibrio and associated human diseases during the past half-century in the coastal North Atlantic.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Aug 23;113(34):E5062-71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1609157113. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
4
Antibiotic resistance of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus in various countries: A review.
Food Microbiol. 2016 Aug;57:128-34. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
6
The emergence of Vibrio pathogens in Europe: ecology, evolution, and pathogenesis (Paris, 11-12th March 2015).
Front Microbiol. 2015 Aug 13;6:830. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00830. eCollection 2015.
7
Correlations between Clinical Features and Mortality in Patients with Vibrio vulnificus Infection.
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 14;10(8):e0136019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136019. eCollection 2015.
8
Antibiotic use for Vibrio infections: important insights from surveillance data.
BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Jun 11;15:226. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-0959-z.
10
In vivo efficacy of the combination of ciprofloxacin and cefotaxime against Vibrio vulnificus sepsis.
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 30;9(6):e101118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101118. eCollection 2014.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验