Rütten Alfred, Frahsa Annika, Abel Thomas, Bergmann Matthias, de Leeuw Evelyne, Hunter David, Jansen Maria, King Abby, Potvin Louise
Institute of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Health Promot Int. 2019 Feb 1;34(1):47-59. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dax053.
Population health interventions tend to lack links to the emerging discourse on interactive knowledge production and exchange. This situation may limit both a better understanding of mechanisms that impact health lifestyles and the development of strategies for population level change. This paper introduces an integrated approach based on structure-agency theory in the context of 'social practice'. It investigates the mechanisms of co-production of active lifestyles by population groups, professionals, policymakers and researchers. It combines a whole system approach with an interactive knowledge-to-action strategy for developing and implementing active lifestyle interventions. A system model is outlined to describe and explain how social practices of selected groups co-produce active lifestyles. Four intervention models for promoting the co-production of active lifestyles through an interactive-knowledge-to-action approach are discussed. Examples from case studies of the German research network Capital4Health are used to illustrate, how intervention models might be operationalized in a real-world intervention. Five subprojects develop, implement and evaluate interventions across the life-course. Although subprojects differ with regard to settings and population groups involved, they all focus on the four key components of the system model. The paper contributes new strategies to address the intervention research challenge of sustainable change of inactive lifestyles. The interactive approach presented allows consideration of the specificities of settings and scientific contexts for manifold purposes. Further research remains needed on what a co-produced knowledge-to-action agenda would look like and what impact it might have for whole system change.
人群健康干预措施往往缺乏与新兴的关于互动式知识生产与交流的论述之间的联系。这种情况可能会限制对影响健康生活方式的机制的更好理解以及针对人群层面变化的策略的制定。本文在“社会实践”背景下引入了一种基于结构-能动性理论的综合方法。它研究了人群、专业人员、政策制定者和研究人员共同生产积极生活方式的机制。它将整体系统方法与互动式知识转化为行动的策略相结合,以制定和实施积极生活方式干预措施。概述了一个系统模型,以描述和解释特定群体的社会实践如何共同生产积极生活方式。讨论了通过互动式知识转化为行动的方法促进积极生活方式共同生产的四种干预模型。以德国研究网络“健康资本4”的案例研究为例,来说明干预模型在实际干预中可能如何实施。五个子项目在整个生命历程中开发、实施和评估干预措施。尽管子项目在涉及的环境和人群方面有所不同,但它们都聚焦于系统模型的四个关键组成部分。本文为应对非积极生活方式可持续改变的干预研究挑战贡献了新策略。所提出的互动方法允许出于多种目的考虑环境和科学背景的特殊性。关于共同生产的知识转化为行动议程会是什么样子以及它可能对整个系统变化产生什么影响,仍需要进一步研究。