• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国布拉德福德“创建积极学校”项目的影响和实施的初步洞察。

Initial insights into the impact and implementation of Creating Active Schools in Bradford, UK.

机构信息

Faculty of Life Sciences and Health Studies, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, UK.

Centre for Applied Education Research, Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Jul 5;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01485-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12966-023-01485-3
PMID:37408045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10320983/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few whole-school physical activity programmes integrate implementation science frameworks within the design, delivery, and evaluation. As a result, knowledge of the key factors that support implementation at scale is lacking. The Creating Active Schools (CAS) programme was co-designed and is underpinned by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) model and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The study aims to understand the initial impact and implementation of CAS in Bradford over 9 months using McKay's et al.'s (2019) implementation evaluation roadmap.

METHODS

Focus groups and interviews were conducted with school staff (n = 30, schools = 25), CAS Champions (n = 9), and the CAS strategic lead (n = 1). Qualitative data were analysed both inductively and deductively. The deductive analysis involved coding data into a priori themes based on McKay et al's implementation evaluation roadmap, using a codebook approach to thematic analysis. The inductive analysis included producing initial codes and reviewing themes before finalising.

RESULTS

Identified themes aligned into three categories: (i) key ingredients for successful adoption and implementation of CAS, (ii) CAS implementation: challenges and solutions, and (iv) the perceived effectiveness of CAS at the school level. This included the willingness of schools to adopt and implement whole-school approaches when they are perceived as high quality and aligned with current school values. The programme implementation processes were seen as supportive; schools identified and valued the step-change approach to implementing CAS long-term. Formal and informal communities of practice provided "safe spaces" for cross-school support. Conversely, challenges persisted with gaining broader reach within schools, school staff's self-competence and shifting school culture around physical activity. This resulted in varied uptake between and within schools.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides novel insights into the implementation of CAS, with outcomes aligning to the adoption, reach, and sustainability. Successful implementation of CAS was underpinned by determinants including acceptability, intervention complexity, school culture and school stakeholders' perceived self-efficacy. The combination of McKay's evaluation roadmap and CFIR establishes a rigorous approach for evaluating activity promotion programmes underpinned by behavioural and implementation science. Resultantly this study offers originality and progression in understanding the implementation and effectiveness of whole-school approaches to physical activity.

摘要

背景

很少有整体学校体育活动计划在设计、实施和评估中整合实施科学框架。因此,缺乏支持大规模实施的关键因素的知识。“创建积极学校”(CAS)计划是共同设计的,并以能力、机会、动机和行为(COM-B)模型和实施研究综合框架(CFIR)为基础。该研究旨在使用 McKay 等人(2019 年)的实施评估路线图,在 9 个月内了解布拉德福德的 CAS 的初步影响和实施情况。

方法

对学校工作人员(n=30 人,学校=25 所)、CAS 冠军(n=9 人)和 CAS 战略负责人(n=1 人)进行了焦点小组和访谈。定性数据进行了归纳和演绎分析。演绎分析包括根据 McKay 等人的实施评估路线图,使用主题分析的代码簿方法,将数据编码为先验主题。归纳分析包括在最终确定之前生成初始代码和审查主题。

结果

确定的主题分为三类:(i)成功采用和实施 CAS 的关键因素,(ii)CAS 实施:挑战和解决方案,以及(iv)CAS 在学校层面的感知有效性。这包括当学校认为整体方法高质量且与当前学校价值观一致时,他们愿意采用和实施整体方法。方案实施过程被认为是支持性的;学校确定并重视长期实施 CAS 的阶段性方法。正式和非正式的实践社区为跨校支持提供了“安全空间”。相反,在学校内部和学校之间扩大覆盖面仍然存在挑战,学校工作人员的自我能力和围绕体育活动的学校文化的转变。这导致了学校之间和学校内部的采用率各不相同。

结论

本研究为 CAS 的实施提供了新的见解,结果与采用、覆盖范围和可持续性相一致。CAS 的成功实施是由可接受性、干预复杂性、学校文化和学校利益相关者的感知自我效能等决定因素支撑的。McKay 评估路线图和 CFIR 的结合为行为和实施科学为基础的活动推广计划的评估建立了严格的方法。因此,本研究在理解体育活动的整体学校方法的实施和有效性方面具有新颖性和进展性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31d3/10320983/2ccadfe772b9/12966_2023_1485_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31d3/10320983/937fc8016007/12966_2023_1485_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31d3/10320983/2ccadfe772b9/12966_2023_1485_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31d3/10320983/937fc8016007/12966_2023_1485_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31d3/10320983/2ccadfe772b9/12966_2023_1485_Figb_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Initial insights into the impact and implementation of Creating Active Schools in Bradford, UK.英国布拉德福德“创建积极学校”项目的影响和实施的初步洞察。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Jul 5;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01485-3.
2
Implementation evaluation of an Irish secondary-level whole school programme: a qualitative inquiry.爱尔兰中学整体学校计划的实施评估:一项定性研究。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Oct 1;37(5). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac131.
3
Using a multi-stakeholder experience-based design process to co-develop the Creating Active Schools Framework.运用多方利益相关者基于经验的设计过程共同制定《创建积极学校框架》。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Feb 7;17(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-0917-z.
4
Factors affecting the implementation of a whole school mindfulness program: a qualitative study using the consolidated framework for implementation research.影响全校正念计划实施的因素:使用整合实施研究框架的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 22;20(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4942-z.
5
Effective implementation of primary school-based healthy lifestyle programmes: a qualitative study of views of school staff.有效实施基于小学的健康生活方式计划:学校工作人员观点的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Sep 9;19(1):1239. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7550-2.
6
Assessing the Impacts of Creating Active Schools on Organisational Culture for Physical Activity.评估创建积极学校对体育活动组织文化的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 16;19(24):16950. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416950.
7
An implementation evaluation of a sports-based health intervention for underrepresented middle school youth in Philadelphia.一项在费城代表性不足的中学生中开展基于运动的健康干预的实施评估。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Oct 6;14(10):588-597. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibae039.
8
Evaluation of a Large-Scale School Wellness Intervention Through the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): Implications for Dissemination and Sustainability.通过实施研究综合框架(CFIR)对大规模学校健康干预措施进行评估:对传播与可持续性的启示
Front Health Serv. 2022 Apr 28;2:881639. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.881639. eCollection 2022.
9
Behaviours that prompt primary school teachers to adopt and implement physically active learning: a meta synthesis of qualitative evidence.促使小学教师采用和实施身体活动学习的行为:定性证据的元综合
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Nov 20;18(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01221-9.
10
Barriers and facilitators to the adoption of physical activity policies in elementary schools from the perspective of principals: An application of the consolidated framework for implementation research-A cross-sectional study.从校长视角出发,探讨小学采纳身体活动政策的障碍和促进因素:实施研究综合框架的应用——一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 22;11:935292. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.935292. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
The complexity of promoting physical activity in English state primary schools: an in-depth qualitative analysis of the role of social context.英国公立小学推广体育活动的复杂性:对社会环境作用的深入定性分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 25;25(1):2912. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23471-z.
2
Promoting daily physical activity in Norway as a FYSAK school: a comparative longitudinal study of lower secondary school pupil.作为一所 FYSAK 学校在挪威推广日常体育活动:对初中学生的比较纵向研究。
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Jul 14;7:1543741. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1543741. eCollection 2025.
3
The Erasmus+ EUMOVE project-a school-based promotion of healthy lifestyles to prevent obesity in European children and adolescents.

本文引用的文献

1
Rethinking children's physical activity interventions at school: A new context-specific approach.重新思考学校儿童身体活动干预措施:一种新的具体情境方法。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 13;11:1149883. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1149883. eCollection 2023.
2
Evaluation of a Large-Scale School Wellness Intervention Through the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): Implications for Dissemination and Sustainability.通过实施研究综合框架(CFIR)对大规模学校健康干预措施进行评估:对传播与可持续性的启示
Front Health Serv. 2022 Apr 28;2:881639. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.881639. eCollection 2022.
3
Assessing the Impacts of Creating Active Schools on Organisational Culture for Physical Activity.
Erasmus+ EUMOVE 项目——基于学校的健康生活方式促进,以预防欧洲儿童和青少年肥胖。
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Oct 1;34(5):955-961. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae113.
4
Physical activity interventions in European primary schools: a scoping review to create a framework for the design of tailored interventions in European countries.欧洲小学的身体活动干预措施:一项范围综述,旨在为欧洲国家量身定制干预措施的设计创建一个框架。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 8;12:1321167. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1321167. eCollection 2024.
评估创建积极学校对体育活动组织文化的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 16;19(24):16950. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416950.
4
Exploring the acceptability and feasibility of a whole school approach to physical activity in UK primary schools: a qualitative approach.探索英国小学开展全校性身体活动的可接受性和可行性:一种定性方法。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 30;22(1):2236. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14647-y.
5
Scale-up of the Internet-based Professional Learning to help teachers promote Activity in Youth (iPLAY) intervention: a hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness trial.基于互联网的专业学习扩大规模以帮助教师促进青少年活动(iPLAY)干预:混合类型 3 实施有效性试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Dec 1;19(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01371-4.
6
Global Matrix 4.0 Physical Activity Report Card Grades for Children and Adolescents: Results and Analyses From 57 Countries.全球 4.0 版身体活动报告卡对儿童和青少年的评级:来自 57 个国家的结果和分析。
J Phys Act Health. 2022 Oct 22;19(11):700-728. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2022-0456. Print 2022 Nov 1.
7
School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.以学校为基础的身体活动计划促进 6 至 18 岁儿童和青少年身体活动和健康。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 23;9(9):CD007651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007651.pub3.
8
Considerations for Individual-Level Versus Whole-School Physical Activity Interventions: Stakeholder Perspectives.考虑个体层面与全校层面体育活动干预措施:利益相关者视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 18;18(14):7628. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147628.
9
Barriers and facilitators influencing the sustainment of health behaviour interventions in schools and childcare services: a systematic review.影响学校和儿童保育服务中维持健康行为干预的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2021 Jun 12;16(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01134-y.
10
Eight Investments That Work for Physical Activity.八项适合身体活动的投资。
J Phys Act Health. 2021 May 14;18(6):625-630. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2021-0112. Print 2021 Jun 1.