Phu Jack, Khuu Sieu K, Nivison-Smith Lisa, Zangerl Barbara, Choi Agnes Yiu Jeung, Jones Bryan W, Pfeiffer Rebecca L, Marc Robert E, Kalloniatis Michael
Centre for Eye Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Sep 1;58(11):4863-4876. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-22371.
To determine the locus of test locations that exhibit statistically similar age-related decline in sensitivity to light increments and age-corrected contrast sensitivity isocontours (CSIs) across the central visual field (VF). We compared these CSIs with test point clusters used by the Glaucoma Hemifield Test (GHT).
Sixty healthy observers underwent testing on the Humphrey Field Analyzer 30-2 test grid using Goldmann (G) stimulus sizes I-V. Age-correction factors for GI-V were determined using linear regression analysis. Pattern recognition analysis was used to cluster test locations across the VF exhibiting equal age-related sensitivity decline (age-related CSIs), and points of equal age-corrected sensitivity (age-corrected CSIs) for GI-V.
There was a small but significant test size-dependent sensitivity decline with age, with smaller stimuli declining more rapidly. Age-related decline in sensitivity was more rapid in the periphery. A greater number of unique age-related CSIs was revealed when using smaller stimuli, particularly in the mid-periphery. Cluster analysis of age-corrected sensitivity thresholds revealed unique CSIs for GI-V, with smaller stimuli having a greater number of unique clusters. Zones examined by the GHT consisted of test locations that did not necessarily belong to the same CSI, particularly in the periphery.
Cluster analysis reveals statistically significant groups of test locations within the 30-2 test grid exhibiting the same age-related decline. CSIs facilitate pooling of sensitivities to reduce the variability of individual test locations. These CSIs could guide future structure-function and alternate hemifield asymmetry analyses by comparing matched areas of similar sensitivity signatures.
确定在整个中心视野(VF)中,对光增量的敏感度以及年龄校正后的对比敏感度等值线(CSIs)呈现出统计学上相似的与年龄相关下降的测试位置轨迹。我们将这些CSIs与青光眼半视野检测(GHT)所使用的测试点簇进行了比较。
60名健康观察者使用Goldmann(G)刺激大小I-V在Humphrey视野分析仪30-2测试网格上进行测试。使用线性回归分析确定GI-V的年龄校正因子。模式识别分析用于对整个VF中呈现相同与年龄相关敏感度下降(与年龄相关的CSIs)的测试位置,以及GI-V中年龄校正敏感度相等的点(年龄校正后的CSIs)进行聚类。
随着年龄增长,存在微小但显著的与测试大小相关的敏感度下降,较小的刺激下降得更快。周边区域与年龄相关的敏感度下降更快。使用较小刺激时,尤其是在中周边区域,会揭示出更多独特的与年龄相关的CSIs。对年龄校正敏感度阈值的聚类分析揭示了GI-V的独特CSIs,较小的刺激具有更多独特的聚类。GHT检查的区域由不一定属于同一CSI的测试位置组成,尤其是在周边区域。
聚类分析揭示了30-2测试网格内具有相同与年龄相关下降的统计学上显著的测试位置组。CSIs有助于汇总敏感度以降低各个测试位置的变异性。通过比较具有相似敏感度特征的匹配区域,这些CSIs可为未来的结构-功能和交替半视野不对称分析提供指导。