Bártolo Ana, Monteiro Sara, Pereira Anabela
Departamento de Educação e Psicologia, Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde, Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Cad Saude Publica. 2017 Sep 28;33(9):e00212716. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00212716.
: The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale has been presented as a reliable and valid measure to assess generalized anxiety symptoms in several clinical settings and among the general population. However, some researches did not support the original one-dimensional structure of the GAD-7 tool. Our main aim was to examine the factor structure of GAD-7 comparing the one-factor model fit with a two-factor model (3 somatic nature symptoms and 4 cognitive-emotional nature symptoms) in a sample of college students. This validation study with data collected cross-sectionally included 1,031 Portuguese college students attending courses in the six schools of the Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. Measures included the GAD-7, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the University Student Risk Behaviors Questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) procedures confirmed that neither factor structure was well fitting. Thus, a modified single factor model allowing the error terms of items associated with relaxing difficulties and irritability to covary was an appropriate solution. Additionally, this factor structure revealed configural and metric invariance across gender. A good convergent validity was found by correlating global anxiety and depression. However, this measure showed a weak association with consumption behaviors. Our results are relevant to clinical practice, since the comprehensive approach to GAD-7 contributes to knowing generalized anxiety symptoms trajectory and their correlates within the university setting.
广泛性焦虑障碍7项量表(GAD - 7)已被证明是一种可靠且有效的测量工具,可用于评估多种临床环境及普通人群中的广泛性焦虑症状。然而,一些研究并不支持GAD - 7工具最初的单维结构。我们的主要目的是在大学生样本中,比较单因素模型与双因素模型(3种躯体性症状和4种认知 - 情感性症状)的拟合情况,以此检验GAD - 7的因素结构。这项横断面收集数据的验证研究纳入了1031名在葡萄牙科英布拉理工学院六所学校上课的葡萄牙大学生。测量工具包括GAD - 7、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)和大学生风险行为问卷。验证性因素分析(CFA)程序证实,两种因素结构的拟合度均不佳。因此,一个修正的单因素模型是合适的解决方案,该模型允许与放松困难和易怒相关的项目误差项协变。此外,这种因素结构在性别上显示出构型不变性和度量不变性。通过将总体焦虑与抑郁进行关联,发现该量表具有良好的收敛效度。然而,该量表与消费行为的关联较弱。我们的研究结果与临床实践相关,因为对GAD - 7的综合研究有助于了解大学环境中广泛性焦虑症状的轨迹及其相关因素。