Suppr超能文献

对于大多数转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者而言,单纯使用FOLFOXIRI或联合靶向治疗作为一线治疗是否是合理选择?系统评价与网状Meta分析。

Is FOLFOXIRI alone or combined with targeted therapy administered as first-line treatment a reasonable choice for most patients with mCRC? Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhou Mingyi, Yu Ping, Hernick Davin Dengue Bilibili, Li Yanrong, Wang Yuanhe, Fu Lingyu, Zhang Jingdong

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, PR China.

Department of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, PR China.

出版信息

Oncotarget. 2017 May 9;8(37):62339-62348. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17725. eCollection 2017 Sep 22.

Abstract

Whether the intensive administration of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) alone or combined with target therapy as first-line treatment could improve the prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients is controversial. PubMed, the Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials, Cochrane Systematic Reviews, ClinicalTrials.gov, the databases of conferences were queried to identify RCTs evaluating the efficacies and toxicities of intensive therapies used for first-line treatment of mCRC patients. The search included articles dated from the inception of these resources until March 31, 2017. We estimated HRs for OS and PFS and RRs for ORR, the R0 resection rate, and toxicities. Ten RCTs comprising 2,506 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. The PFS of patients administered FOLFOXIRI plus target therapy experienced prolonged PFS and OS and improved ORRs compared with FOLFOX/FOLFIRI plus target therapy (PFS: HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59-0.86; OS: HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.94; ORR: RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.96-2.88; R0 resection rate: RR 2.66, 95% CI 1.86-3.82). There were no significant differences between PFS, OS, ORRs, or R0 resection rates and toxicities of patients administered FOLFOXIRI and FOLFOX/FOLFIRI plus target therapy. Further, FOLFOXIRI plus target therapy did not increase toxicities compared with FOLFOX/FOLFIRI plus target therapy. FOLFOXIRI plus target therapy when administered as first-line treatment of patients with mCRC is the best choice and did not increase toxicities. The patients with mutations could benefit from FOLFOXIRI plus Bev. FOLFOXIRI is as effective as FOLFOX/FOLFIRI plus target therapy.

摘要

亚叶酸、5-氟尿嘧啶、奥沙利铂和伊立替康(FOLFOXIRI)单独强化给药或与靶向治疗联合作为一线治疗能否改善转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的预后存在争议。检索了PubMed、Cochrane协作网临床对照试验中央注册库、Cochrane系统评价、ClinicalTrials.gov以及会议数据库,以确定评估用于mCRC患者一线治疗的强化疗法疗效和毒性的随机对照试验(RCT)。检索范围包括这些资源建立之初至2017年3月31日的文章。我们估计了总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的风险比(HR)以及客观缓解率(ORR)、R0切除率和毒性的相对危险度(RR)。该网状Meta分析纳入了10项包含2506例患者的RCT。与FOLFOX/FOLFIRI联合靶向治疗相比,接受FOLFOXIRI联合靶向治疗的患者PFS延长、OS延长且ORR提高(PFS:HR 0.71,95%可信区间[CI]0.59 - 0.86;OS:HR 0.81,95%CI 0.69 - 0.94;ORR:RR 1.66,95%CI 0.96 - 2.88;R0切除率:RR 2.66,95%CI 1.86 - 3.82)。接受FOLFOXIRI和FOLFOX/FOLFIRI联合靶向治疗的患者在PFS、OS、ORR或R0切除率及毒性方面无显著差异。此外,与FOLFOX/FOLFIRI联合靶向治疗相比,FOLFOXIRI联合靶向治疗并未增加毒性。FOLFOXIRI联合靶向治疗作为mCRC患者的一线治疗是最佳选择且未增加毒性。有 突变的患者可从FOLFOXIRI联合贝伐单抗中获益。FOLFOXIRI与FOLFOX/FOLFIRI联合靶向治疗同样有效。 (注:原文中“ mutations”处有缺失信息)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8aa/5617509/0eb74f9d9fde/oncotarget-08-62339-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验