Strang Lucy, Broeks Miriam
Rand Health Q. 2017 Jan 1;6(4):9. eCollection 2017 Jan.
Over recent years many European Union countries have made changes to the design of the maternity leave provision. These policy developments reflect calls for greater gender equality in the workforce and more equal share of childcare responsibilities. However, while research shows that long period of leave can have negative effects on women's labour market attachment and career advancements, early return to work can be seen as a factor preventing exclusive breastfeeding, and therefore, potentially having negative health impacts for babies. Indeed, the World Health Organisation recommends exclusive breastfeeding up to 6 months of age to provide babies with the nutrition for healthy growth and brain development, protection from life-threatening ailments, obesity and non-communicable diseases such as asthma and diabetes. Therefore, labour market demands on women may be at odds with the health benefits for children gained by longer periods of maternity leave. The aim of this article is to examine the relationship between leave provision and health benefits for children. We examine maternity and parental leave provision across European countries and its potential impact on the breastfeeding of very young babies (up to 6-months of age). We also consider economic factors of potential extension of maternity leave provision to 6 months, such as costs to businesses, effects on the female labour market attachment, and wider consequences (benefits and costs) for individuals, families, employers and the wider society.
近年来,许多欧盟国家对产假政策的设计进行了调整。这些政策变化反映了人们呼吁在劳动力市场上实现更大程度的性别平等,并更平等地分担育儿责任。然而,虽然研究表明长时间休假可能会对女性的劳动力市场参与度和职业发展产生负面影响,但过早重返工作岗位可能被视为阻碍纯母乳喂养的一个因素,因此,可能会对婴儿的健康产生负面影响。事实上,世界卫生组织建议在婴儿6个月大之前进行纯母乳喂养以便为婴儿提供健康成长和大脑发育所需的营养,预防危及生命的疾病、肥胖以及哮喘和糖尿病等非传染性疾病。因此,劳动力市场对女性的需求可能与延长产假给儿童带来的健康益处相矛盾。本文的目的是研究产假政策与儿童健康益处之间的关系。我们考察了欧洲各国的产假和陪产假政策及其对6个月以下婴儿母乳喂养的潜在影响。我们还考虑了将产假延长至6个月的潜在经济因素,例如企业成本、对女性劳动力市场参与度的影响以及对个人、家庭、雇主和更广泛社会的更广泛影响(益处和成本)。