National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Genome Biol Evol. 2017 Oct 1;9(10):2812-2825. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evx192.
The Clustered Regularly Interspaced Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated proteins (Cas) systems of bacterial and archaeal adaptive immunity show multifaceted evolutionary relationships with at least five classes of mobile genetic elements (MGE). First, the adaptation module of CRISPR-Cas that is responsible for the formation of the immune memory apparently evolved from a Casposon, a self-synthesizing transposon that employs the Cas1 protein as the integrase and might have brought additional cas genes to the emerging immunity loci. Second, a large subset of type III CRISPR-Cas systems recruited a reverse transcriptase from a Group II intron, providing for spacer acquisition from RNA. Third, effector nucleases of Class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems that are responsible for the recognition and cleavage of the target DNA were derived from transposon-encoded TnpB nucleases, most likely, on several independent occasions. Fourth, accessory nucleases in some variants of types I and III toxin and type VI effectors RNases appear to be ultimately derived from toxin nucleases of microbial toxin-antitoxin modules. Fifth, the opposite direction of evolution is manifested in the recruitment of CRISPR-Cas systems by a distinct family of Tn7-like transposons that probably exploit the capacity of CRISPR-Cas to recognize unique DNA sites to facilitate transposition as well as by bacteriophages that employ them to cope with host defense. Additionally, individual Cas proteins, such as the Cas4 nuclease, were recruited by bacteriophages and transposons. The two-sided evolutionary connection between CRISPR-Cas and MGE fits the "guns for hire" paradigm whereby homologous enzymatic machineries, in particular nucleases, are shuttled between MGE and defense systems and are used alternately as means of offense or defense.
细菌和古菌适应性免疫的成簇规律间隔短回文重复 (CRISPR)-CRISPR 相关蛋白 (Cas) 系统与至少五类移动遗传元件 (MGE) 表现出多方面的进化关系。首先,负责形成免疫记忆的 CRISPR-Cas 适应模块显然来自 Casposon,Casposon 是一种自我合成的转座子,它使用 Cas1 蛋白作为整合酶,可能将额外的 cas 基因带到新兴的免疫基因座。其次,一大类 III 型 CRISPR-Cas 系统从 II 类内含子招募了逆转录酶,为 RNA 介导的间隔子获取提供了可能。第三,负责识别和切割靶 DNA 的 II 类 CRISPR-Cas 系统的效应核酶来源于转座子编码的 TnpB 核酶,很可能在几个独立的场合。第四,一些 I 型和 III 型毒素和 VI 型效应物 RNA 酶的变体中的辅助核酶似乎最终来源于微生物毒素-抗毒素模块的毒素核酶。第五,进化的相反方向表现在特定的 Tn7 样转座子家族对 CRISPR-Cas 系统的招募上,这些转座子可能利用 CRISPR-Cas 识别独特 DNA 位点的能力来促进转座,以及噬菌体利用它们来应对宿主防御。此外,个别 Cas 蛋白,如 Cas4 核酸酶,被噬菌体和转座子招募。CRISPR-Cas 与 MGE 之间的这种双向进化联系符合“雇佣兵”模式,即同源酶学机制,特别是核酶,在 MGE 和防御系统之间穿梭,并交替用作进攻或防御的手段。