• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用非参数贝叶斯方法对 EQ-5D 进行基于偏好的指数建模。

Modelling a preference-based index for EQ-5D using a non-parametric Bayesian method.

机构信息

American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, American University of Beirut, Riad El Solh 1107-2020, P.O. BOX: 11-0236, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2018 Nov;27(11):2841-2850. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1935-z. Epub 2018 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-018-1935-z
PMID:30008157
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conventionally, models used for health state valuation data have been parametric. Recently, a number of researchers have investigated the use of non-parametric Bayesian methods in this area.

OBJECTIVES

In this paper, we present a non-parametric Bayesian model to estimate a preference-based index for a five-dimensional health state classification, namely EQ-5D.

METHODS

A sample of 2997 members of the UK general population valued 43 health states selected from a total of 243 health states defined by the EQ-5D using time trade-off technique. Findings from non-parametric modelling are reported in this paper and compared to previously used parametric estimations. The impact of respondent characteristics on health state valuations is also reported.

RESULTS

The non-parametric models were found to be better at predicting scores in populations with different distributions of characteristics than observed in the survey sample. Additionally, non-parametric models were found to be better at allowing for the impact of respondent characteristics to vary by health state. The results show an important age effect with sex having some effect.

CONCLUSION

The non-parametric Bayesian models provide more realistic and better utility estimates from the EQ-5D than previously used parametric models have done. Furthermore, the model is more flexible in estimating the impact of covariates.

摘要

背景

传统上,用于健康状态估值数据的模型都是参数模型。最近,许多研究人员已经在这一领域研究了非参数贝叶斯方法的使用。

目的

本文提出了一种非参数贝叶斯模型,用于估计五维健康状态分类(即 EQ-5D)的偏好指数。

方法

使用时间权衡技术,从 EQ-5D 定义的总共 243 个健康状态中选择了 2997 名英国普通人群的样本,对其中的 43 个健康状态进行了评估。本文报告了非参数建模的结果,并与以前使用的参数估计进行了比较。还报告了受访者特征对健康状态估值的影响。

结果

非参数模型在预测具有不同特征分布的人群的得分方面表现优于观察到的调查样本。此外,非参数模型更能允许受访者特征对健康状态的影响有所不同。结果显示出重要的年龄效应,性别也有一定影响。

结论

非参数贝叶斯模型比以前使用的参数模型提供了更真实和更好的 EQ-5D 效用估计。此外,该模型在估计协变量的影响方面更具灵活性。

相似文献

1
Modelling a preference-based index for EQ-5D using a non-parametric Bayesian method.采用非参数贝叶斯方法对 EQ-5D 进行基于偏好的指数建模。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Nov;27(11):2841-2850. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1935-z. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
2
Modeling a preference-based index for two condition-specific measures (asthma and overactive bladder) using a nonparametric Bayesian method.采用非参数贝叶斯方法为两种特定疾病指标(哮喘和膀胱过度活动症)建模偏好指数。
Value Health. 2014 Jun;17(4):406-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.05.002.
3
Modelling a preference-based index for EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-3L + Sleep using a Bayesian framework.使用贝叶斯框架为 EQ-5D-3L 和 EQ-5D-3L + Sleep 构建偏好指数模型。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Jun;29(6):1495-1507. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02436-2. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
4
A comparison of United States and United Kingdom EQ-5D health states valuations using a nonparametric Bayesian method.采用非参数贝叶斯方法对美国和英国 EQ-5D 健康状态估值进行比较。
Stat Med. 2010 Jul 10;29(15):1622-34. doi: 10.1002/sim.3874.
5
Bayesian nonparametric estimation of EQ-5D utilities for United States using the existing United Kingdom data.利用英国现有数据对美国EQ-5D效用进行贝叶斯非参数估计。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Oct 6;15(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0770-1.
6
Valuation of preference-based measures: can existing preference data be used to generate better estimates?基于偏好的衡量指标的评估:现有的偏好数据是否可以用来生成更好的估计值?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jun 5;16(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0945-4.
7
Use of a Non-parametric Bayesian Method to Model Health State Preferences: An Application to Polish and Irish EQ-5D-5L Valuations.使用非参数贝叶斯方法建模健康状态偏好:波兰和爱尔兰 EQ-5D-5L 估值的应用。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;10:917728. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.917728. eCollection 2022.
8
Valuations of EQ-5D health states: are the United States and United Kingdom different?EQ-5D健康状态的估值:美国和英国有所不同吗?
Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3):221-8. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00004.
9
Modeling SF-6D Hong Kong standard gamble health state preference data using a nonparametric Bayesian method.采用非参数贝叶斯方法对 SF-6D 香港标准博弈健康状态偏好数据进行建模。
Value Health. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(6):1032-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.06.020.
10
Capturing Valuation Study Sampling Uncertainty in the Estimation of Health State Utility Values Using the EQ-5D-3L.使用 EQ-5D-3L 估计健康状态效用值时,捕获估值研究抽样不确定性。
Med Decis Making. 2024 May;44(4):393-404. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241239899. Epub 2024 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences for health-related quality of life: do they vary by age? A systematic literature review on the EQ-5D measure.健康相关生活质量的偏好:它们会因年龄而异吗?关于EQ-5D量表的系统文献综述。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Mar 25. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01766-7.
2
The Short Form 6 Dimensions (SF-6D): Development and Evolution.简短健康调查问卷6维度量表(SF-6D):发展与演变
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Jan;23(1):19-33. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00919-8. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
3
Modelling a preference-based index for EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-3L + Sleep using a Bayesian framework.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling HUI 2 health state preference data using a nonparametric Bayesian method.使用非参数贝叶斯方法对健康效用指数2(HUI 2)健康状态偏好数据进行建模。
Med Decis Making. 2008 Nov-Dec;28(6):875-87. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08318460. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
2
Estimation of a preference-based index from a condition-specific measure: the King's Health Questionnaire.从特定疾病测量指标估计基于偏好的指数:国王健康问卷。
Med Decis Making. 2008 Jan-Feb;28(1):113-26. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07301820. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
3
Modelling covariates for the SF-6D standard gamble health state preference data using a nonparametric Bayesian method.
使用贝叶斯框架为 EQ-5D-3L 和 EQ-5D-3L + Sleep 构建偏好指数模型。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Jun;29(6):1495-1507. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02436-2. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
使用非参数贝叶斯方法对SF-6D标准博弈健康状态偏好数据的协变量进行建模。
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Mar;64(6):1242-52. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.10.040. Epub 2006 Dec 8.
4
Modelling SF-6D health state preference data using a nonparametric Bayesian method.使用非参数贝叶斯方法对SF-6D健康状态偏好数据进行建模。
J Health Econ. 2007 May 1;26(3):597-612. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.09.002. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
5
US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model.美国EQ-5D健康状态的估值:D1估值模型的开发与测试
Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3):203-20. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00003.
6
Health state values for the HUI 2 descriptive system: results from a UK survey.HUI 2描述系统的健康状态值:英国一项调查的结果。
Health Econ. 2005 Mar;14(3):231-44. doi: 10.1002/hec.925.
7
The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.基于SF-36量表对健康偏好测量值的估计。
J Health Econ. 2002 Mar;21(2):271-92. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00130-8.
8
Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system.健康效用指数3系统的多属性和单属性效用函数
Med Care. 2002 Feb;40(2):113-28. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200202000-00006.
9
A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments.生活质量评估量表(AQoL)与其他四种通用效用工具的比较。
Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):358-70. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002090.
10
Valuing health states: a comparison of methods.评估健康状态:方法比较
J Health Econ. 1996 Apr;15(2):209-31. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(95)00038-0.