Laboratory for Financial Engineering, MIT Sloan School of Management, USA; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, MIT, USA.
Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, USA.
Drug Discov Today. 2018 Feb;23(2):395-401. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2017.09.016. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
We apply Bayesian decision analysis (BDA) to incorporate patient preferences in the regulatory approval process for new therapies. By assigning weights to type I and type II errors based on patient preferences, the significance level (α) and power (1-β) of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) for a new therapy can be optimized to maximize the value to current and future patients and, consequently, to public health. We find that for weight-loss devices, potentially effective low-risk treatments have optimal αs larger than the traditional one-sided significance level of 5%, whereas potentially less effective and riskier treatments have optimal αs below 5%. Moreover, the optimal RCT design, including trial size, varies with the risk aversion and time-to-access preferences and the medical need of the target population.
我们应用贝叶斯决策分析(BDA)将患者偏好纳入新疗法的监管审批过程中。通过根据患者偏好为 I 类和 II 类错误分配权重,可以优化新疗法随机临床试验(RCT)的显著性水平(α)和效力(1-β),以最大化当前和未来患者以及公共卫生的价值。我们发现,对于减肥设备,潜在有效且低风险的治疗方法的最优 α 值大于传统的单侧显著性水平 5%,而潜在效果较差且风险较高的治疗方法的最优 α 值低于 5%。此外,最优 RCT 设计,包括试验规模,随着目标人群的风险厌恶和获得治疗的时间偏好以及医疗需求而变化。