• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死后长期使用β-肾上腺素能拮抗剂进行常规治疗的成本与效果

Costs and effectiveness of routine therapy with long-term beta-adrenergic antagonists after acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Goldman L, Sia S T, Cook E F, Rutherford J D, Weinstein M C

机构信息

Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1988 Jul 21;319(3):152-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198807213190306.

DOI:10.1056/NEJM198807213190306
PMID:2898733
Abstract

We analyzed the costs and effectiveness of routine therapy with beta-adrenergic antagonists in patients who survived an acute myocardial infarction. On the basis of data pooled from the literature, this form of therapy resulted in a 25 percent relative reduction annually in the mortality rate for years 1 to 3 and a 7 percent relative reduction for years 4 to 6 after a myocardial infarction. The estimated cost of six years of routine beta-adrenergic-antagonist therapy to save an additional year of life was $23,400 in low-risk patients, $5,900 in medium-risk patients, and $3,600 in high-risk patients, assuming that the entire benefit of earlier treatment is lost immediately after six years. Under a more likely assumption--that the benefit of six years of treatment wears off gradually over the subsequent nine years--the estimated cost of therapy per year of life saved would be $13,000 in low-risk patients, $3,600 in medium-risk patients, and $2,400 in high-risk patients. As compared with coronary-artery bypass grafting and the medical treatment of hypertension, routine beta-adrenergic-antagonist therapy has a relatively favorable cost-effectiveness ratio.

摘要

我们分析了β-肾上腺素能拮抗剂常规治疗对急性心肌梗死后存活患者的成本和效果。根据文献汇总的数据,这种治疗方式在心肌梗死后1至3年使死亡率每年相对降低25%,4至6年使死亡率相对降低7%。假设六年的早期治疗全部益处会在六年后立即消失,那么对于低风险患者,采用β-肾上腺素能拮抗剂常规治疗六年以多挽救一年生命的估计成本为23,400美元,中风险患者为5,900美元,高风险患者为3,600美元。在一个更有可能的假设下——即六年治疗的益处会在随后九年中逐渐消失——那么低风险患者每挽救一年生命的治疗估计成本为13,000美元,中风险患者为3,600美元,高风险患者为2,400美元。与冠状动脉搭桥术和高血压药物治疗相比,β-肾上腺素能拮抗剂常规治疗具有相对有利的成本效益比。

相似文献

1
Costs and effectiveness of routine therapy with long-term beta-adrenergic antagonists after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后长期使用β-肾上腺素能拮抗剂进行常规治疗的成本与效果
N Engl J Med. 1988 Jul 21;319(3):152-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198807213190306.
2
Cost effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy with tissue plasminogen activator as compared with streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction.与链激酶相比,组织型纤溶酶原激活剂溶栓治疗急性心肌梗死的成本效益。
N Engl J Med. 1995 May 25;332(21):1418-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199505253322106.
3
Cost-effectiveness of captopril therapy after myocardial infarction.心肌梗死后卡托普利治疗的成本效益
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Oct;26(4):914-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00284-1.
4
Cost effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase in elderly patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction.链激酶溶栓治疗老年疑似急性心肌梗死患者的成本效益
N Engl J Med. 1992 Jul 2;327(1):7-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199207023270102.
5
Cost-effectiveness of cholesterol-lowering therapy with pravastatin in patients with previous acute coronary syndromes aged 65 to 74 years compared with younger patients: results from the LIPID study.与年轻患者相比,普伐他汀降低胆固醇治疗对65至74岁曾患急性冠脉综合征患者的成本效益:来自LIPID研究的结果。
Am Heart J. 2006 Jun;151(6):1305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.07.014.
6
[Cost effectiveness of captopril after myocardial infarct; comment].[心肌梗死后卡托普利的成本效益;评论]
Med Klin (Munich). 1996 Feb 15;91(2):112-8.
7
Cost effectiveness of early discharge after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction.无并发症急性心肌梗死后早期出院的成本效益
N Engl J Med. 2000 Mar 16;342(11):749-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200003163421101.
8
Cost-effectiveness of intense insulin treatment after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus; results from the DIGAMI study.糖尿病患者急性心肌梗死后强化胰岛素治疗的成本效益;DIGAMI研究结果
Eur Heart J. 2000 May;21(9):733-9. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1999.1859.
9
Cost effectiveness of enoxaparin in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 (Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 25) study.依诺肝素治疗急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死的成本效益:ExTRACT-TIMI 25(依诺肝素与溶栓再灌注治疗急性心肌梗死-心肌梗死溶栓试验25)研究
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Sep 29;54(14):1271-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.060.
10
[Comparison of the cost effectiveness of treatment of acute myocardial infarct with primary angioplasty and thrombolysis ].[急性心肌梗死采用直接血管成形术与溶栓治疗的成本效益比较]
Vnitr Lek. 2003 Feb;49(2):97-102.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost effectiveness of a government supported policy strategy to decrease sodium intake: global analysis across 183 nations.一项政府支持的降低钠摄入量政策策略的成本效益:对183个国家的全球分析
BMJ. 2017 Jan 10;356:i6699. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6699.
2
The role of funding and policies on innovation in cancer drug development.资金与政策在癌症药物研发创新中的作用。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2010;4:164. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2010.164. Epub 2010 Feb 3.
3
Use of recommended medications after myocardial infarction in Austria.奥地利心肌梗死后推荐药物的使用情况。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23(2):153-62. doi: 10.1007/s10654-007-9212-4. Epub 2007 Dec 7.
4
Optimal management of high-risk T1G3 bladder cancer: a decision analysis.高危T1G3膀胱癌的优化管理:一项决策分析
PLoS Med. 2007 Sep;4(9):e284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040284.
5
Eplerenone : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in patients with post-myocardial infarction heart failure.依普利酮:对其用于心肌梗死后心力衰竭患者的药物经济学评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(10):1057-72. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200523100-00008.
6
Cost effectiveness of ramipril treatment for cardiovascular risk reduction.雷米普利治疗降低心血管风险的成本效益。
Heart. 2001 May;85(5):539-43. doi: 10.1136/heart.85.5.539.
7
Current concepts in secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后二级预防的当前概念。
Herz. 2000 Feb;25(1):47-60. doi: 10.1007/BF03044123.
8
Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and heart failure. The consequences of underprescribing.血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂与心力衰竭。处方不足的后果。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Jun;15(6):535-50. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199915060-00002.
9
Under-utilisation of beta-blockers after acute myocardial infarction. Pharmacoeconomic implications.急性心肌梗死后β受体阻滞剂使用不足。药物经济学影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Mar;15(3):257-68. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199915030-00005.
10
The cost of treating dyslipidaemia using National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines.采用美国国家胆固醇教育计划(NCEP)指南治疗血脂异常的成本。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;14 Suppl 3:19-28. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199814003-00003.