APC Microbiome Institue, University College Cork, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland.
Schools of Microbiology, University College Cork, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland.
Gut. 2018 Aug;67(8):1454-1463. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314814. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Microbiota alterations are linked with colorectal cancer (CRC) and notably higher abundance of putative oral bacteria on colonic tumours. However, it is not known if colonic mucosa-associated taxa are indeed orally derived, if such cases are a distinct subset of patients or if the oral microbiome is generally suitable for screening for CRC. METHODS: We profiled the microbiota in oral swabs, colonic mucosae and stool from individuals with CRC (99 subjects), colorectal polyps (32) or controls (103). RESULTS: Several oral taxa were differentially abundant in CRC compared with controls, for example, and s pp. A classification model of oral swab microbiota distinguished individuals with CRC or polyps from controls (sensitivity: 53% (CRC)/67% (polyps); specificity: 96%). Combining the data from faecal microbiota and oral swab microbiota increased the sensitivity of this model to 76% (CRC)/88% (polyps). We detected similar bacterial networks in colonic microbiota and oral microbiota datasets comprising putative oral biofilm forming bacteria. While these taxa were more abundant in CRC, core networks between pathogenic, CRC-associated oral bacteria such as , and were also detected in healthy controls. High abundance of Lachnospiraceae was negatively associated with the colonisation of colonic tissue with oral-like bacterial networks suggesting a protective role for certain microbiota types against CRC, possibly by conferring colonisation resistance to CRC-associated oral taxa and possibly mediated through habitual diet. CONCLUSION: The heterogeneity of CRC may relate to microbiota types that either predispose or provide resistance to the disease, and profiling the oral microbiome may offer an alternative screen for detecting CRC.
背景与目的:微生物群的改变与结直肠癌(CRC)有关,特别是在结肠肿瘤上发现了更多的假定口腔细菌。然而,尚不清楚结肠黏膜相关的分类群是否确实来自口腔,如果这些病例是患者的一个独特亚组,或者口腔微生物组是否通常适合用于筛查 CRC。
方法:我们对 CRC 患者(99 例)、结直肠息肉患者(32 例)或对照者(103 例)的口腔拭子、结肠黏膜和粪便中的微生物群进行了分析。
结果:与对照组相比,CRC 患者的口腔分类群存在差异,例如 和 s pp。口腔拭子微生物群的分类模型能够区分 CRC 患者或息肉患者与对照者(敏感性:53%(CRC)/67%(息肉);特异性:96%)。将粪便微生物群和口腔拭子微生物群的数据结合起来,提高了该模型的敏感性,达到 76%(CRC)/88%(息肉)。我们在包括假定口腔生物膜形成细菌的结肠微生物群和口腔微生物群数据集中检测到了类似的细菌网络。虽然这些分类群在 CRC 中更为丰富,但在健康对照者中也检测到了与致病性、CRC 相关的口腔细菌(如 、 和 )之间的核心网络。厚壁菌门的丰度较高与 CRC 患者结肠组织中口腔样细菌网络的定植呈负相关,这表明某些微生物群类型可能对 CRC 具有保护作用,可能通过对 CRC 相关口腔分类群赋予定植抵抗作用,并且可能通过习惯性饮食来介导。
结论:CRC 的异质性可能与易患或提供对疾病的抵抗力的微生物群类型有关,对口腔微生物组进行分析可能提供一种替代的 CRC 检测方法。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022
Microbiome. 2016-12-30
World J Gastroenterol. 2024-7-21
Nat Commun. 2025-9-1
Exploration (Beijing). 2025-3-24
Int J Mol Sci. 2025-7-20
AIMS Microbiol. 2025-4-14
Curr Res Microb Sci. 2025-6-6
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2025-5-28
Chin Med J (Engl). 2025-6-5
J Epidemiol Res. 2016-10
Clin Cancer Res. 2016-10-3
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016-1-8