Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical College, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017 Jun 21;2(3):118-123. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000072. eCollection 2017 Sep.
The role of clopidogrel in treating patients with acute ischaemic stroke is unclear. We have conducted the clinical trial in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel with a loading dose in treating patients with non-cardiogenic acute ischaemic stroke.
Clopidogrel loading dose versus maintenance dose to treat patients with acute ischaemic stroke in China (CLASS-China) was a prospective, randomised, double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical trial in China. Patients with acute ischaemic stroke of non-cardiogenic origin within 48 hours of onset were enrolled and those received thrombolysis were excluded. Enrolled patients were divided into two treatment groups: loading dose and routine dose. The primary outcome was the incidence of stroke recurrence or progression within 7 days. Primary safety outcome was measured by life-threatening haemorrhage. An intent-to-treat analysis was used for the statistical analysis.
From March 2008 to March 2010, a total of 303 patients from 16 centres were recruited into this study; six were excluded because of lack of basic information. Since the enrolment was slow and the study drug expired in March 2010, this clinical trial was stopped earlier than planned. No significant baseline and demographic differences were seen between the two groups. There was no difference in primary outcome between the loading dosage group 16.1% (24/149) and control group 14.9% (22/148), respectively (p=0.782). The mortality and disability rate within 90 days in loading dose group (19.6%) was slightly lower than that in controlled group (23.4%), p=0.444. Loading dose group had two (1.3%) cases of fatal haemorrhage and control group had four (2.7%) within 90 days, p=0.674. No significant difference was detected in other adverse events between the groups.
In our study stopped early due to slow enrolment, loading dose of clopidogrel does not reduce the risk of recurrent stroke. Future trials with sufficient number of patients enrolled are needed to re-examine this hypothesis.
氯吡格雷治疗急性缺血性脑卒中患者的作用尚不清楚。我们进行了这项临床试验,以评估氯吡格雷负荷剂量治疗非心源性急性缺血性脑卒中患者的疗效和安全性。
氯吡格雷负荷剂量与维持剂量治疗中国急性缺血性脑卒中患者(CLASS-China)是一项在中国进行的前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。纳入发病 48 小时内的非心源性起源的急性缺血性脑卒中患者,排除溶栓患者。入组患者分为两组:负荷剂量组和常规剂量组。主要结局是 7 天内卒中复发或进展的发生率。主要安全性结局是通过危及生命的出血来衡量。采用意向治疗分析进行统计分析。
2008 年 3 月至 2010 年 3 月,来自 16 个中心的 303 名患者入组本研究;因基本信息缺失,6 名患者被排除。由于入组缓慢,研究药物于 2010 年 3 月过期,本临床试验提前结束。两组之间的基线和人口统计学差异无统计学意义。负荷剂量组 16.1%(24/149)和对照组 14.9%(22/148)的主要结局无差异(p=0.782)。负荷剂量组(19.6%)和对照组(23.4%)90 天内的死亡率和残疾率略有下降,p=0.444。负荷剂量组有 2 例(1.3%)致命性出血,对照组有 4 例(2.7%)在 90 天内发生致命性出血,p=0.674。两组间其他不良事件发生率无差异。
由于入组缓慢,本研究提前终止,氯吡格雷负荷剂量并未降低卒中复发风险。需要进行纳入足够数量患者的未来试验来重新检验这一假设。