1 Department of Rehabilitation, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Japan.
2 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Japan.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018 Jan;25(2):212-219. doi: 10.1177/2047487317735715. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
Background Although gait speed and six-minute walk distance are used to assess functional capacity in older patients with cardiovascular disease, their prognostic capabilities have not been directly compared. Methods The study population was identified from the Kitasato University Cardiac Rehabilitation Database and consisted of 1474 patients ≥60 years old with a mean age of 72.2 ± 7.1 years that underwent evaluation of both usual gait speed and six-minute walk distance in routine geriatric assessment between 1 June 2008-30 September 2015. Both gait speed and six-minute walk distance were determined on the same day at hospital discharge. Results Mean gait speed and six-minute walk distance in the whole population were 1.04 m/s and 381 m, respectively, and were strongly positively correlated ( r = 0.80, p < 0.001). A total of 180 deaths occurred during a follow-up of 2.3 ± 1.9 years. After adjusting for confounding factors, both gait speed (adjusted hazard ratio per 0.1 m/s increase: 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.81-0.93, p < 0.001) and six-minute walk distance (adjusted hazard ratio per 10-metre increase: 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.94-0.97, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of all-cause mortality. There was no significant difference in prognostic capability between gait speed and six-minute walk distance (c-index: 0.64 (95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.69) and 0.66 (95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.70), respectively, p = 0.357). Conclusions Gait speed and six-minute walk distance showed similar prognostic predictive ability for all-cause mortality in older cardiovascular disease patients, indicating the potential utility of gait speed as a simple risk stratification tool in older cardiovascular disease patients.
尽管步速和 6 分钟步行距离常用于评估老年心血管疾病患者的功能能力,但它们的预后能力尚未被直接比较。
该研究人群来自甲南大学心脏康复数据库,包括 1474 名年龄均≥60 岁的患者,这些患者在 2008 年 6 月 1 日至 2015 年 9 月 30 日期间的常规老年评估中同时接受了常规步速和 6 分钟步行距离评估。出院当天在医院同时测定步速和 6 分钟步行距离。
全人群的平均步速和 6 分钟步行距离分别为 1.04 m/s 和 381 m,两者呈强正相关(r=0.80,p<0.001)。在 2.3±1.9 年的随访期间,共有 180 人死亡。在校正混杂因素后,步速(每增加 0.1 m/s 的调整后危险比:0.87,95%置信区间:0.81-0.93,p<0.001)和 6 分钟步行距离(每增加 10 米的调整后危险比:0.96,95%置信区间:0.94-0.97,p<0.001)均为全因死亡的独立预测因素。步速和 6 分钟步行距离的预后能力无显著差异(C 指数:0.64(95%置信区间:0.60-0.69)和 0.66(95%置信区间:0.61-0.70),p=0.357)。
在老年心血管疾病患者中,步速和 6 分钟步行距离对全因死亡率的预后预测能力相似,表明步速作为老年心血管疾病患者简单风险分层工具具有潜在的应用价值。