Yé Yazoume, Eisele Thomas P, Eckert Erin, Korenromp Eline, Shah Jui A, Hershey Christine L, Ivanovich Elizabeth, Newby Holly, Carvajal-Velez Liliana, Lynch Michael, Komatsu Ryuichi, Cibulskis Richard E, Moore Zhuzhi, Bhattarai Achuyt
MEASURE Evaluation, ICF, Rockville, Maryland.
Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Sep;97(3_Suppl):9-19. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0363.
Concerted efforts from national and international partners have scaled up malaria control interventions, including insecticide-treated nets, indoor residual spraying, diagnostics, prompt and effective treatment of malaria cases, and intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This scale-up warrants an assessment of its health impact to guide future efforts and investments; however, measuring malaria-specific mortality and the overall impact of malaria control interventions remains challenging. In 2007, Roll Back Malaria's Monitoring and Evaluation Reference Group proposed a theoretical framework for evaluating the impact of full-coverage malaria control interventions on morbidity and mortality in high-burden SSA countries. Recently, several evaluations have contributed new ideas and lessons to strengthen this plausibility design. This paper harnesses that new evaluation experience to expand the framework, with additional features, such as stratification, to examine subgroups most likely to experience improvement if control programs are working; the use of a national platform framework; and analysis of complete birth histories from national household surveys. The refined framework has shown that, despite persisting data challenges, combining multiple sources of data, considering potential contributions from both fundamental and proximate contextual factors, and conducting subnational analyses allows identification of the plausible contributions of malaria control interventions on malaria morbidity and mortality.
撒哈拉以南非洲地区(SSA)的国家和国际伙伴共同努力,扩大了疟疾控制干预措施,包括使用经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐、室内滞留喷洒、诊断、对疟疾病例进行及时有效的治疗以及孕期间歇性预防治疗。这种扩大规模的做法需要评估其对健康的影响,以指导未来的工作和投资;然而,衡量疟疾特异性死亡率以及疟疾控制干预措施的总体影响仍然具有挑战性。2007年,遏制疟疾伙伴关系的监测与评估参考小组提出了一个理论框架,用于评估在高负担的撒哈拉以南非洲国家全面覆盖疟疾控制干预措施对发病率和死亡率的影响。最近,一些评估为加强这种合理性设计贡献了新的思路和经验教训。本文利用这些新的评估经验来扩展该框架,增加了分层等新特性,以研究如果控制项目有效实施,哪些亚组最有可能出现改善;使用国家平台框架;以及分析国家住户调查中的完整出生史。经过完善的框架表明,尽管数据挑战依然存在,但整合多种数据来源、考虑基本和直接背景因素的潜在贡献以及进行次国家级分析,能够确定疟疾控制干预措施对疟疾发病率和死亡率的合理贡献。