Suppr超能文献

医院患者安全文化调查(HSOPS):评分策略的变异性

Hospital survey on patient safety culture (HSOPS): variability of scoring strategies.

作者信息

Giai Joris, Boussat Bastien, Occelli Pauline, Gandon Gerald, Seigneurin Arnaud, Michel Philippe, François Patrice

机构信息

Service de Biostatistique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Laboratoire de biométrie et biologie évolutive, UMR 5558 CNRS, F-69003 Lyon, France.

Quality of Care Unit, Grenoble University Hospital, F-38043 Grenoble, France.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Oct 1;29(5):685-692. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx086.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the variability of safety culture dimension scores and their associated rankings depending on three different scoring strategies using the Hospital Survey On Patient Safety Culture (HSOPS).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire.

SETTING

The study was conducted in an 1836-bed acute-care French university hospital with an annual volume of 135 999 stays, between April 2013 and November 2014.

PARTICIPANTS

All caregivers and technical-administrative staff with at least 6 months of employment, spending at least half of their working time in the hospital, were asked to participate.

INTERVENTION

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The variability of the HSOPS results using three different scoring methods: the percentage of positive responses recommended by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the averaged individual means and the averaged individual sums.

RESULTS

The response rate was 78.6% (n = 3978). The percentage of positive responses resulted in lower scores compared to averaged individual means and averaged individual sums in the six least developed dimensions, and gave more widely spread scores and greater 95CIs in the six most developed dimensions. Department rankings also varied greatly depending on the scoring methods.

CONCLUSION

The values of the HSOPS scores and their corresponding rankings greatly depended on the computation method. This finding shows how important it is to agree on the use of the same scoring strategies, before broadly comparing results within and across organizations.

摘要

目的

使用患者安全文化医院调查(HSOPS)评估三种不同评分策略下安全文化维度得分及其相关排名的变异性。

设计

采用自填式问卷的横断面研究。

背景

该研究于2013年4月至2014年11月在一家拥有1836张床位的法国急性护理大学医院进行,年住院量为135999人次。

参与者

所有工作至少6个月、至少一半工作时间在医院的护理人员和技术行政人员均被邀请参与。

干预措施

无。

主要观察指标

使用三种不同评分方法得出的HSOPS结果的变异性:医疗保健研究与质量局推荐的阳性反应百分比、个体均值的平均值和个体总和的平均值。

结果

回复率为78.6%(n = 3978)。在六个最不发达的维度中,阳性反应百分比得出的分数低于个体均值的平均值和个体总和的平均值,并且在六个最发达的维度中给出的分数分布更广、95%置信区间更大。部门排名也因评分方法而异。

结论

HSOPS得分及其相应排名的值在很大程度上取决于计算方法。这一发现表明,在广泛比较组织内部和组织之间的结果之前,就使用相同的评分策略达成一致是多么重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验