• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Issues and complexities in safety culture assessment in healthcare.医疗保健安全文化评估中的问题与复杂性。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 15;11:1217542. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1217542. eCollection 2023.
2
Safety culture assessment: a tool for improving patient safety in healthcare organizations.患者安全文化评估:一种改善医疗机构患者安全的工具。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Dec;12 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii17-23. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.suppl_2.ii17.
3
Predictors of response rates of safety culture questionnaires in healthcare: a systematic review and analysis.预测医疗保健安全文化调查问卷应答率的因素:系统评价与分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 16;12(9):e065320. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065320.
4
Hospital safety climate surveys: measurement issues.医院安全氛围调查:测量问题。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010 Dec;16(6):632-8. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32833f0ee6.
5
The associations between work-life balance behaviours, teamwork climate and safety climate: cross-sectional survey introducing the work-life climate scale, psychometric properties, benchmarking data and future directions.工作-生活平衡行为、团队合作氛围和安全氛围之间的关系:引入工作-生活氛围量表的横断面调查、心理测量学特性、基准数据和未来方向。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Aug;26(8):632-640. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006032. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
6
The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research.安全态度问卷:心理测量特性、基准数据及新兴研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Apr 3;6:44. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-44.
7
Measurement tools and process indicators of patient safety culture in primary care. A mixed methods study by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care.基层医疗中患者安全文化的测量工具与过程指标。LINNEAUS基层医疗患者安全合作项目的一项混合方法研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2015 Sep;21 Suppl(sup1):26-30. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1043732.
8
Improving patient safety culture in Saudi Arabia (2012-2015): trending, improvement and benchmarking.提升沙特阿拉伯的患者安全文化(2012 - 2015年):趋势、改进与基准对比
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 2;17(1):516. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2461-3.
9
A methodological study to compare survey-based and observation-based evaluations of organisational and safety cultures and then compare both approaches with markers of the quality of care.一种比较基于调查和基于观察的组织和安全文化评估方法的方法学研究,然后将这两种方法与护理质量的标志物进行比较。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 May;16(25):iii-iv, 1-184. doi: 10.3310/hta16250.
10
Patient safety culture in out-of-hours primary care services in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional survey.荷兰非工作时间基层医疗服务中的患者安全文化:一项横断面调查。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Mar;36(1):28-35. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1426150. Epub 2018 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of the Persian nursing students' learning self-efficacy instrument.波斯语版护理专业学生学习自我效能感量表的心理测量学评估
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 2;20(9):e0331435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331435. eCollection 2025.
2
From Blame to Learning: The Evolution of the London Protocol for Patient Safety.从指责到学习:伦敦患者安全协议的演变
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 14;13(16):2003. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13162003.
3
Safety Culture Through Patient Voice: Qualitative Validation of the Patients' Perceptions of Safety Culture Scale (PaPSC) in Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery.通过患者声音塑造安全文化:心脏病学和心胸外科中患者对安全文化量表(PaPSC)认知的定性验证
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70213. doi: 10.1111/hex.70213.
4
Exploring the fear of clinical errors: associations with socio-demographic, professional, burnout, and mental health factors in healthcare workers - A nationwide cross-sectional study.探索对临床错误的恐惧:与医疗保健工作者的社会人口统计学、职业、倦怠和心理健康因素的关联——一项全国性横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 26;12:1423905. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1423905. eCollection 2024.
5
The anatomy of safe surgical teams: an interview-based qualitative study among members of surgical teams at tertiary referral hospitals in Norway.安全手术团队的剖析:一项基于访谈的挪威三级转诊医院手术团队成员定性研究。
Patient Saf Surg. 2024 Feb 19;18(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13037-024-00389-w.

本文引用的文献

1
The Safety of Inpatient Health Care.住院患者医疗安全。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jan 12;388(2):142-153. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2206117.
2
Predictors of response rates of safety culture questionnaires in healthcare: a systematic review and analysis.预测医疗保健安全文化调查问卷应答率的因素:系统评价与分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 16;12(9):e065320. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065320.
3
Experience of learning from everyday work in daily safety huddles-a multi-method study.从日常安全班前会上的工作学习经验——一项多方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 30;22(1):1101. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08462-9.
4
Patient Safety and Staff Well-Being: Organizational Culture as a Resource.患者安全与员工福祉:组织文化作为一种资源。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 21;19(6):3722. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063722.
5
Improving Healthcare Workers' Adherence to Surgical Safety Checklist: The Impact of a Short Training.提高医护人员对手术安全检查表的依从性:短期培训的影响。
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 8;9:732707. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.732707. eCollection 2021.
6
Dimensions of safety culture: a systematic review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods for assessing safety culture in hospitals.安全文化的维度:系统综述评估医院安全文化的定量、定性和混合方法。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 27;11(7):e043982. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043982.
7
Influence of Burnout on Patient Safety: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. burnout 对患者安全的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Aug 30;55(9):553. doi: 10.3390/medicina55090553.
8
Safety Culture: An Integration of Existing Models and a Framework for Understanding Its Development.安全文化:现有模型的整合及发展理解框架。
Hum Factors. 2021 Feb;63(1):88-110. doi: 10.1177/0018720819868878. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
9
Safety culture in health care teams: A narrative review of the literature.医疗团队中的安全文化:文献综述。
J Nurs Manag. 2019 Jul;27(5):871-883. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12740. Epub 2019 Apr 14.
10
The relationship between safety culture and safety climate and safety performance: a systematic review.安全文化与安全氛围及安全绩效的关系:系统综述
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2021 Mar;27(1):206-216. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1556976. Epub 2019 May 24.

医疗保健安全文化评估中的问题与复杂性。

Issues and complexities in safety culture assessment in healthcare.

机构信息

Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health, and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia.

IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 15;11:1217542. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1217542. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1217542
PMID:37397763
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10309647/
Abstract

The concept of safety culture in healthcare-a culture that enables staff and patients to be free from harm-is characterized by complexity, multifacetedness, and indefinability. Over the years, disparate and unclear definitions have resulted in a proliferation of measurement tools, with lack of consensus on how safety culture can be best measured and improved. A growing challenge is also achieving sufficient response rates, due to "survey fatigue," with the need for survey optimisation never being more acute. In this paper, we discuss key challenges and complexities in safety culture assessment relating to definition, tools, dimensionality and response rates. The aim is to prompt critical reflection on these issues and point to possible solutions and areas for future research.

摘要

医疗保健中的安全文化概念——一种使员工和患者免受伤害的文化——的特点是复杂性、多面性和不可定义性。多年来,不同的和不明确的定义导致了大量的测量工具的出现,对于如何最好地衡量和改善安全文化,缺乏共识。由于“调查疲劳”,实现足够的回应率也是一个日益严峻的挑战,因此对调查进行优化的需求从未如此迫切。本文讨论了与定义、工具、维度和回应率有关的安全文化评估中的关键挑战和复杂性。目的是促使对这些问题进行批判性思考,并指出可能的解决方案和未来研究的领域。