Department of Urology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Department of Histology and Embryology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Andrology. 2017 Nov;5(6):1100-1104. doi: 10.1111/andr.12417. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
To investigate the ability of some hematologic prognostic scores demonstrating inflammation in predicting sperm presence in testicular sperm extraction (TESE). We retrospectively investigated the medical data of 430 patients with the diagnosis of non-obstruc tive azoospermia (NOA) who had undergone TESE operation consecutively in our institution between the dates of January 2009 and February 2017. In all, 352 patients with the diagnosis of NOA, with bilaterally palpable vas deferens, who had undergone TESE for the first time, were included in the study. Patients with genetic anomalies, genital infection, history of surgery or vasectomy, chronic diseases, history of inflammatory, metabolic, rheumatologic, or malignant diseases, morbid obesity, with the diagnosis of clinical varicocele, or patients who had undergone TESE for the second time were excluded from the study. According to the results of TESE, the patients were divided into two groups as those with sperm retrieval and those without sperm retrieval. These groups were compared in terms of age, infertility duration, body mass index, hormone profile, hematologic parameters, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NRL), monocyte-to-eosinophil ratio (MER), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). The NLR and PLR levels were found to be significantly higher in patients without sperm retrieval at TESE compared to those with sperm retrieval. The logistic regression analysis showed NLR as an independent factor that showed the presence of spermatozoa at TESE (odds ratio: 4.786, %95 confidence interval: 2.667-8.589, p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the PLR was determined to be 0.574. As the calculated AUC value of the PLR was below 0.6, there was insufficient evidence determined at TESE to say that it was a reliable marker to indicate the presence of spermatozoa. The area of the MER value under the ROC curve was not statistically significant. It has been demonstrated that systemic inflammation negatively affects the probability of extracting spermatozoa in TESE and NLR is an independent factor indicating the presence of spermatozoa in TESE.
为了研究一些血液学预后评分在预测睾丸精子提取(TESE)中精子存在的能力,我们回顾性地调查了 2009 年 1 月至 2017 年 2 月期间在我院连续进行 TESE 手术的 430 名非梗阻性无精子症(NOA)患者的医学数据。共有 352 名双侧可触及输精管的诊断为非梗阻性无精子症的患者被纳入本研究。排除有遗传异常、生殖器感染、手术或输精管结扎术史、慢性疾病、炎症、代谢、风湿或恶性疾病史、病态肥胖、临床精索静脉曲张诊断或第二次 TESE 手术的患者。根据 TESE 的结果,将患者分为精子提取组和无精子提取组。比较两组患者的年龄、不孕时间、体重指数、激素水平、血液学参数、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、单核细胞与嗜酸性粒细胞比值(MER)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)。结果发现,在 TESE 中无精子提取的患者的 NLR 和 PLR 水平明显高于有精子提取的患者。逻辑回归分析显示,NLR 是 TESE 中存在精子的独立因素(优势比:4.786,95%置信区间:2.667-8.589,p<0.001)。PLR 的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.574。由于 PLR 的计算 AUC 值低于 0.6,因此在 TESE 中没有足够的证据表明它是一个可靠的标记物来指示精子的存在。MER 值的 ROC 曲线下面积无统计学意义。已经证明全身炎症会降低 TESE 中提取精子的概率,NLR 是 TESE 中精子存在的独立因素。