• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量女性及其伴侣对分娩期间所接受护理满意度的工具的有效性:系统评价

Validity of instruments for measuring the satisfaction of a woman and her partner with care received during labour and childbirth: Systematic review.

作者信息

Alfaro Blazquez Ruben, Corchon Silvia, Ferrer Ferrandiz Esperanza

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, University and Polytechnic Hospital "La Fe", Valencia, Spain; School of Nursing and Podiatry, University of Valencia, Spain.

School of Nursing and Podiatry, University of Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Midwifery. 2017 Dec;55:103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.014
PMID:28992553
Abstract

BACKGROUND

patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality of care is becoming more and more important. The use of questionnaires is the most common method to evaluate satisfaction with maternity care. Despite the extensive variety of instruments available for this purpose, they vary widely in terms of their content and quality.

OBJECTIVES

to identify, assess and summarize the most recent and robust instruments available to measure woman and partner satisfaction with the overall package of care during the labour and birth of their baby within a hospital setting.

DESIGN

systematic review.

METHODS

sixteen electronic databases were consulted. The research also included hand searching references of identified articles. Studies were assessed by two independent reviewers. Inclusion criteria were that participants were mothers and their respective partners and that the questionnaire was a multidimensional instrument used for measuring satisfaction with care during the labour and birth of a baby. Furthermore, the psychometric properties related to construction, reliability and validity of the questionnaire had to be reported.

FINDINGS

seventeen studies were included. The majority of the questionnaires was developed within Europe and was disparate in terms of sample, items, dimensions and collection time. Most of them were limited to healthy women with low obstetric risk pregnancies. Only one instrument included partners as the subject of study. All questionnaires reported at least one aspect of reliability, content and construct validity.

CONCLUSIONS

there are a moderate number of instruments capable of measuring maternal satisfaction with the care received during labour and birth within a hospital setting. Our study provides an overview of the most up-to-date, valid and reliable tools available. Further investigations are needed in order to improve existing instruments by performing additional psychometric tests, considering more specific populations and assessing the satisfaction of the partner and mother jointly.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

assessments of satisfaction with care during labour and birth are relevant to healthcare professionals, administrators and policy makers. Therefore, these instruments are able to assist them according to their specific needs.

摘要

背景

患者满意度作为医疗质量的一项指标正变得越来越重要。使用问卷调查是评估对产科护理满意度最常用的方法。尽管有大量可用于此目的的工具,但它们在内容和质量方面差异很大。

目的

识别、评估和总结用于衡量女性及其伴侣对医院环境中分娩期间整体护理套餐满意度的最新且可靠的工具。

设计

系统评价。

方法

查阅了16个电子数据库。该研究还包括手工检索已识别文章的参考文献。由两名独立评审员对研究进行评估。纳入标准为参与者是母亲及其各自的伴侣,且问卷是用于测量分娩期间护理满意度的多维工具。此外,必须报告与问卷的构建、信度和效度相关的心理测量特性。

结果

纳入了17项研究。大多数问卷是在欧洲开发的,在样本、项目、维度和收集时间方面各不相同。其中大多数仅限于低产科风险妊娠的健康女性。只有一份工具将伴侣作为研究对象。所有问卷都报告了信度、内容和结构效度的至少一个方面。

结论

有数量适中的工具能够测量医院环境中产妇对分娩期间所接受护理的满意度。我们的研究概述了现有的最新、有效和可靠的工具。需要进一步研究,以便通过进行额外的心理测量测试、考虑更特定的人群以及联合评估伴侣和母亲的满意度来改进现有工具。

对实践的启示

对分娩期间护理满意度的评估与医疗保健专业人员、管理人员和政策制定者相关。因此,这些工具能够根据他们的特定需求为他们提供帮助。

相似文献

1
Validity of instruments for measuring the satisfaction of a woman and her partner with care received during labour and childbirth: Systematic review.测量女性及其伴侣对分娩期间所接受护理满意度的工具的有效性:系统评价
Midwifery. 2017 Dec;55:103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
2
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.硬膜外镇痛与非硬膜外镇痛或无镇痛用于分娩疼痛管理的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4.
3
Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings.门诊环境中引产的药物和机械干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 13;9(9):CD007701. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007701.pub3.
4
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well-being.分娩时对胎儿心率进行间歇性听诊以评估胎儿健康状况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 13;2(2):CD008680. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008680.pub2.
5
Fundal pressure during the second stage of labour.第二产程中的宫底压力。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 7;3(3):CD006067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006067.pub3.
6
Parenteral opioids for maternal pain management in labour.用于分娩时产妇疼痛管理的胃肠外阿片类药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 5;6(6):CD007396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007396.pub3.
7
Assessment and support during early labour for improving birth outcomes.分娩早期的评估与支持以改善分娩结局
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 20;4(4):CD011516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011516.pub2.
8
Immersion in water during labour and birth.分娩过程中浸泡在水中。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 16;5(5):CD000111. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub4.
9
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
10
Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour.连续胎心监护(CTG)作为一种电子胎儿监护(EFM)形式,用于分娩期间的胎儿评估。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 3;2(2):CD006066. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006066.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptation and validation of the Polish version of the Quality from Patient Perspective-Intrapartal (QPP-I) questionnaire to assess childbirth care.从患者角度评估分娩护理的波兰版《分娩期质量视角问卷》(QPP-I)的改编与验证
Eur J Midwifery. 2025 May 12;9. doi: 10.18332/ejm/201472. eCollection 2025.
2
Pharmacological pain relief and women´s birth experience: a systematic review.药物止痛与女性分娩体验:一项系统综述
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Apr 26;25(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07602-3.
3
The Childbirth Experience of Pregnant Women Living with HIV Virus.
感染艾滋病毒孕妇的分娩经历
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 14;14(6):1975. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061975.
4
Prevalence and risk factors of maternal dissatisfaction after vaginal delivery: A multicenter prospective study.阴道分娩后产妇不满的患病率及危险因素:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 May;169(2):645-655. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.16091. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
5
Psychometric Reliability to Assess the Perception of Women's Fulfillment of Maternity Rights.评估女性对产假权利实现认知的心理测量可靠性。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Aug 5;14(8):2248-2261. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14080150.
6
The Childbirth Experiences of Pregnant Women Living with HIV Virus: Scoping Review.感染艾滋病毒的孕妇的分娩经历:范围综述
Children (Basel). 2024 Jun 18;11(6):743. doi: 10.3390/children11060743.
7
Key dimensions of women's and their partners' experiences of childbirth: A systematic review of reviews of qualitative studies.女性及其伴侣分娩体验的关键维度:定性研究系统评价综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 29;19(3):e0299151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299151. eCollection 2024.
8
Measuring Women's Satisfaction with Childbirth: A Literature Review of Measurement Properties.衡量女性对分娩的满意度:测量属性的文献综述
Zdr Varst. 2024 Mar 20;63(2):100-108. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2024-0014. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Cultural adaptation, validation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire version 2.0 in the Spanish context.文化调适、验证及评估西班牙文版生育经验问卷 2.0 的心理计量特性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Mar 19;24(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06400-7.
10
Maternal satisfaction with group care: a systematic review.产妇对集体护理的满意度:一项系统综述。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2023 Dec 24;4(1):100301. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100301. eCollection 2024 Feb.