Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Schizophr Bull. 2024 Apr 30;50(3):663-672. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbad151.
Reduced social cognition has been reported in individuals who have committed interpersonal violence. It is unclear if individuals with schizophrenia and a history of violence have larger impairments than violent individuals without psychosis and non-violent individuals with schizophrenia. We examined social cognition in two groups with violent offenses, comparing their performance to non-violent individuals with schizophrenia and healthy controls.
Two social cognitive domains were assessed in four groups: men with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder with (SSD-V, n = 27) or without (SSD-NV, n = 42) a history of violence, incarcerated men serving preventive detention sentences (V, n = 22), and healthy male controls (HC, n = 76). Theory of mind (ToM) was measured with the Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition (MASC), body emotion perception with Emotion in Biological Motion (EmoBio) test.
Kruskal-Wallis H-tests revealed overall group differences for social cognition. SSD-V had a global and clinically significant social cognitive impairment. V had a specific impairment, for ToM. Binary logistic regressions predicting violence category membership from social cognition and psychosis (SSD status) were conducted. The model with best fit, explaining 18%-25% of the variance, had ToM as the only predictor.
Social cognitive impairment was present in individuals with a history of violence, with larger and more widespread impairment seen in schizophrenia. ToM predicted violence category membership, psychosis did not. The results suggest a role for social cognition in understanding interpersonal violence.
有研究报道,人际暴力的实施者存在社会认知能力下降的情况。但是否存在精神分裂症病史且有暴力行为的个体,其社会认知功能损害较无精神分裂症但有暴力行为的个体和无暴力行为但有精神分裂症的个体更大,目前尚不清楚。我们对比两组有暴力犯罪史的个体,考察了他们的社会认知功能,同时将其与无暴力行为的精神分裂症个体和健康对照者进行比较。
我们在四个组中评估了两个社会认知领域:一组为有(SSD-V,n=27)或无(SSD-NV,n=42)精神分裂症病史且有暴力行为的男性;一组为正在服预防性监禁刑的男性(V,n=22);还有一组为健康男性对照者(HC,n=76)。使用电影评估社会认知测验(MASC)评估心理理论(ToM),使用生物运动中的情绪测试(EmoBio)评估躯体情绪感知。
Kruskal-Wallis H 检验显示,社会认知存在总体组间差异。SSD-V 有全面的、临床上显著的社会认知障碍。V 组有特定的 ToM 障碍。我们进行了从社会认知和精神病(SSD 状态)预测暴力行为类别的二元逻辑回归。具有最佳拟合度的模型(可解释 18%-25%的方差)仅将 ToM 作为预测因子。
有暴力行为史的个体存在社会认知障碍,精神分裂症个体的障碍更严重、更广泛。ToM 是暴力行为类别的唯一预测因子,而精神病不是。结果提示,社会认知在理解人际暴力中发挥作用。