Suppr超能文献

喉咽反流患者反流类型的特征比较

Comparison of Characteristics According to Reflux Type in Patients With Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

作者信息

Lee Jun Seok, Jung Ah Ra, Park Jung Min, Park Myung Jin, Lee Young Chan, Eun Young-Gyu

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jun;11(2):141-145. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2017.00577. Epub 2017 Oct 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To analyze laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) as an acidic, nonacidic, or mixed type according to 24-hour multi-channel intraluminal impedance (MII) pH monitoring and the clinical characteristics of each type.

METHODS

Ninety patients were prospectively enrolled in this study. All patients underwent 24-hour MII pH monitoring as a diagnostic tool. Eighty-three patients were diagnosed with LPR. The patients were classified into three groups according to the pH of the hypopharyngeal probe: the acid reflux group, nonacid reflux group, and mixed reflux group. Subjective symptoms and objective findings were evaluated based on patients' responses to the Short Form 12 Survey (SF-12), LPR health-related quality of life (LPR-HRQOL), reflux symptom index, and reflux finding score.

RESULTS

The results of each group were compared. As a result, 34 patients were classified into the nonacid reflux group and 49 into the mixed reflux group. There were no patients classified as having acid reflux alone. There was no significant difference between the two groups when comparing the reflux symptom index, reflux finding score, LPR-HRQOL, or the mental component score of the SF-12. However, the physical component score of the SF-12 was higher in the nonacid reflux group (=0.018). The DeMeester composite score (=0.015) and total number of LPR events (=0.001) were lower in the nonacid reflux group than in the mixed reflux group.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, no LPR patient had only acid reflux. The nonacid reflux LPR patients showed similar clinical characteristics and findings compared to the mixed reflux group, but exhibited significantly fewer LPR episodes.

摘要

目的

根据24小时多通道腔内阻抗(MII)pH监测分析喉咽反流(LPR)的酸性、非酸性或混合型,并分析各类型的临床特征。

方法

前瞻性纳入90例患者。所有患者均接受24小时MII pH监测作为诊断工具。83例患者被诊断为LPR。根据下咽探头的pH值将患者分为三组:酸反流组、非酸反流组和混合反流组。基于患者对简明健康状况调查量表(SF-12)、LPR健康相关生活质量(LPR-HRQOL)、反流症状指数和反流发现评分的回答,对主观症状和客观发现进行评估。

结果

对各组结果进行比较。结果,34例患者被归入非酸反流组,49例被归入混合反流组。没有患者仅被分类为酸反流。比较反流症状指数、反流发现评分、LPR-HRQOL或SF-12的心理成分评分时,两组之间没有显著差异。然而,非酸反流组的SF-12身体成分评分更高(=0.018)。非酸反流组的DeMeester综合评分(=0.015)和LPR事件总数(=0.001)低于混合反流组。

结论

总之,没有LPR患者仅有酸反流。与混合反流组相比,非酸反流LPR患者表现出相似的临床特征和表现,但LPR发作明显较少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93c8/5951063/0e9ba3d73802/ceo-2017-00577f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验