• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现行胸外科医师学会模型重新分类经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的死亡率风险。

Current Society of Thoracic Surgeons Model Reclassifies Mortality Risk in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH (A.K., K.S., J.N., K.B., K.A., C.L., D.M., A.K.A., A.C.S., V.M., A.K., E.M.T., W.A.J., S.M., L.G.S., S.R.K.).

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Louisville, KY (A.R.K.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep;11(9):e006664. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006664.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006664
PMID:30354591
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) scores are used to screen patients for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The STS scores were also used to risk stratify patients in major TAVR trials. This study evaluates the reclassification of predicted risk of mortality by the currently available online STS score calculator compared with the 2008 STS risk model in patients undergoing TAVR.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All patients who underwent TAVR from 2006 to 2016 were included in the study. The STS scores for all included patients were calculated by applying the 2008 STS risk model and again using the current STS online calculator. Among 1209 patients who underwent TAVR, 30-day mortality was 27 (2.2%). The overall predicted risk of mortality estimated by using the current online STS risk calculator was significantly lower than the 2008 STS risk model (6.3±4.4 vs 7.3±4.9; P<0.001). A total of 235 (19%) patients were reclassified into a lower risk category per the current STS risk model. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-1.9; P=0.03), chronic heart failure (odds ratio, 6.0; 95% CI, 3.8-10.1; P<0.001), and New York Heart Association class IV heart failure (odds ratio, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.3-4.4; P=0.007) were more likely to be reclassified into a lower risk category per the current STS risk model.

CONCLUSIONS

The current STS calculation method produces significantly lower predicted risk of mortality than the 2008 calculator, more pronounced in patients with certain comorbid conditions. These results should be considered while evaluating data from prior studies of TAVR.

摘要

背景

胸外科医师学会(STS)评分用于筛选接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的患者。STS 评分也用于对大型 TAVR 试验中的患者进行风险分层。本研究评估了目前在线 STS 评分计算器对接受 TAVR 的患者死亡率预测风险的重新分类与 2008 年 STS 风险模型的比较。

方法和结果

所有 2006 年至 2016 年接受 TAVR 的患者均纳入本研究。应用 2008 年 STS 风险模型和当前 STS 在线计算器计算所有纳入患者的 STS 评分。在 1209 例接受 TAVR 的患者中,30 天死亡率为 27(2.2%)。应用当前在线 STS 风险计算器估计的总体死亡率预测风险明显低于 2008 年 STS 风险模型(6.3±4.4 比 7.3±4.9;P<0.001)。根据当前 STS 风险模型,共有 235(19%)例患者被重新分类为低风险类别。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,持续性心房颤动(优势比,1.4;95%置信区间,1.0-1.9;P=0.03)、慢性心力衰竭(优势比,6.0;95%置信区间,3.8-10.1;P<0.001)和纽约心脏协会心功能分级 IV 级心力衰竭(优势比,2.4;95%置信区间,1.3-4.4;P=0.007)的患者更有可能根据当前 STS 风险模型被重新分类为低风险类别。

结论

与 2008 年计算器相比,当前 STS 计算方法产生的死亡率预测风险显著降低,在某些合并症患者中更为明显。在评估 TAVR 先前研究的数据时,应考虑这些结果。

相似文献

1
Current Society of Thoracic Surgeons Model Reclassifies Mortality Risk in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.现行胸外科医师学会模型重新分类经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的死亡率风险。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep;11(9):e006664. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006664.
2
Inclusion of Functional Status Measures in the Risk Adjustment of 30-Day Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Report From the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT Registry.在经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 30 天死亡率的风险调整中纳入功能状态测量:来自胸外科医师学会/美国心脏病学会经导管主动脉瓣置换术登记处的报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 26;11(6):581-589. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.242.
3
Transfemoral TAVR in Nonagenarians: From the CENTER Collaboration.经股动脉入路主动脉瓣置换术在 90 岁以上高龄患者中的应用:来自 CENTER 协作组的研究
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May 27;12(10):911-920. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.031.
4
TAVI risk scoring using established versus new scoring systems: role of the new STS/ACC model.采用现有评分系统与新型评分系统对 TAVI 风险进行评分:新型 STS/ACC 模型的作用。
EuroIntervention. 2018 Jan 20;13(13):1520-1526. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00421.
5
Clinical outcomes at 1 year following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术 1 年后的临床结果。
JAMA. 2015 Mar 10;313(10):1019-28. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1474.
6
Impact of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Risk Profiles of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术对主动脉瓣置换术患者风险特征的影响。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Aug;21(8):959-963. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.04.035. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
7
Validation of STS/ACC TVT-TAVR Score in Veterans Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术退伍军人中STS/ACC TVT-TAVR评分的验证
J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Dec;30(12):447-451. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
8
Addition of albumin to Traditional Risk Score Improved Prediction of Mortality in Individuals Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.在传统风险评分中加入白蛋白可改善经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的死亡率预测。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Nov;65(11):2413-2417. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15070. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
9
Association Between Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid vs Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis and Mortality or Stroke.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣与三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄与死亡率或卒中性事件的相关性。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 11;321(22):2193-2202. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.7108.
10
Mortality prediction after transcatheter treatment of failed bioprosthetic aortic valves utilizing various international scoring systems: Insights from the Valve-in-Valve International Data (VIVID).经导管治疗生物瓣衰败的死亡率预测:利用各种国际评分系统的观点——来自经导管主动脉瓣置换术国际数据(VIVID)。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 15;92(6):1163-1170. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27714. Epub 2018 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of TAVR with SAVR on clinical outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)与外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)治疗主动脉瓣狭窄患者临床结局的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 May 21;87(6):3768-3776. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003275. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Determining sex differences in aortic valve myofibroblast responses to drug combinations identified using a digital medicine platform.利用数字医学平台确定主动脉瓣成肌纤维细胞对联合用药反应中的性别差异。
Sci Adv. 2025 Jun 6;11(23):eadu2695. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adu2695.
3
Machine-learning versus traditional methods for prediction of all-cause mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
机器学习与传统方法预测经导管主动脉瓣植入术后全因死亡率的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Open Heart. 2025 Jan 21;12(1):e002779. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002779.
4
Intraoperative Features Improve Model Risk Predictions After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.术中特征改善冠状动脉旁路移植术后模型风险预测
Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep. 2024 Mar 7;2(3):336-340. doi: 10.1016/j.atssr.2024.02.005. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
Reducing Length of Hospital Stay Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后缩短住院时间
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 13;13(18):5433. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185433.
6
Recovery rate from conduction disorders in patients with permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后植入永久性起搏器患者传导障碍的恢复率。
Open Heart. 2024 Sep 18;11(2):e002867. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002867.
7
Risk factors and operative risk of large vessel occlusion and stroke during cardiac surgery.心脏手术期间大血管闭塞和中风的危险因素和手术风险。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024 Nov;33(11):107958. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107958. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
8
Assessment of TVT and STS Risk Score Performances in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者中TVT和STS风险评分表现的评估
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Apr 21;2(3):100600. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100600. eCollection 2023 May-Jun.
9
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Past, present, and future.经导管主动脉瓣置换术:过去、现在和未来。
Clin Cardiol. 2024 Jan;47(1):e24209. doi: 10.1002/clc.24209.
10
Health-related quality of life following TAVI or cardiac surgery in patients at intermediate and low risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术或心脏手术治疗中低危患者的健康相关生活质量:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Med (Lond). 2023 Nov;23(6):594-605. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2023-0258.