Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Korea.
Jpn J Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 22;74(6):537-542. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2020.978. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
In this study, we aimed to assess the performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the detection of pulmonary tuberculosis compared to the acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear and culture analysis, and the incidence of rifampin resistance using the drug susceptibility test. The specimens referred for AFB smear and culture analysis and Xpert MTB/RIF assay from April 2015 to March 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The sensitivity, specificity, and mean cycle threshold (Ct) values obtained in Xpert MTB/RIF assay and for rifampin resistance were analyzed. The results of Xpert MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis were evaluated based on the AFB smear grade. Among 3,840 specimens, 491 were positive in Xpert MTB/RIF assay and 626 in culture analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF assay were 75.6% and 99.4%, respectively. The sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF assay for smear-positive/culture-positive specimens was 98.6% and that of smear-negative and -trace/culture-positive specimens was 63.1%. The positivity of Xpert MTB/RIF assay for culture-positive specimens was 89.9%, 98.6%, 95.7%, 100.0%, and 100.0% for the smear grades trace, 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+, respectively. The Ct values of 491 specimens significantly decreased as the AFB smear grade increased (P < 0.0001). The Ct values of smear-positive, -trace, and -negative specimens were 21.7 ± 4.2, 26.5 ± 3.9, and 27.4 ± 3.6, respectively. Rifampin resistance evaluated using Xpert MTB/RIF assay and culture analysis exhibited a correlation of 98.3%. The region covered by probe E was the most frequently mutated region (50.0%). Xpert MTB/RIF assay demonstrated reliable performance in detecting pulmonary tuberculosis from smear-positive and culture-positive specimens; however, further improvements are still required to detect smear-negative and culture-positive specimens.
在这项研究中,我们旨在评估 Xpert MTB/RIF 检测与抗酸杆菌(AFB)涂片和培养分析相比,用于检测肺结核的性能,以及使用药物敏感性试验检测利福平耐药的发生率。回顾性分析了 2015 年 4 月至 2018 年 3 月送检的 AFB 涂片和培养分析以及 Xpert MTB/RIF 检测的标本。分析了 Xpert MTB/RIF 检测获得的敏感性、特异性和平均循环阈值(Ct)值,以及利福平耐药性。根据 AFB 涂片等级评估 Xpert MTB/RIF 检测对肺结核的结果。在 3840 个标本中,Xpert MTB/RIF 检测 491 个阳性,培养分析 626 个阳性。Xpert MTB/RIF 检测的敏感性和特异性分别为 75.6%和 99.4%。Xpert MTB/RIF 检测对涂片阳性/培养阳性标本的敏感性为 98.6%,对涂片阴性和-痕迹/培养阳性标本的敏感性为 63.1%。Xpert MTB/RIF 检测对培养阳性标本的阳性率分别为 AFB 涂片痕迹、1+、2+、3+、4+时为 89.9%、98.6%、95.7%、100.0%和 100.0%。随着 AFB 涂片等级的增加,491 个标本的 Ct 值显著降低(P<0.0001)。涂片阳性、-痕迹、和-阴性标本的 Ct 值分别为 21.7±4.2、26.5±3.9 和 27.4±3.6。Xpert MTB/RIF 检测和培养分析评估的利福平耐药性具有 98.3%的相关性。探针 E 覆盖的区域是最常突变的区域(50.0%)。Xpert MTB/RIF 检测在检测涂片阳性和培养阳性的标本中表现出可靠的性能;然而,仍然需要进一步改进来检测涂片阴性和培养阳性的标本。