• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中学户外校园吸烟禁令的可持续性:一项混合方法研究。

Sustainability of outdoor school ground smoking bans at secondary schools: a mixed-method study.

机构信息

Department Tranzo, Academic Collaborative Centre for Public Health Brabant, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Academic Collaborative Centre for Public Health Limburg, Public Health Service South Limburg (GGD ZL), Geleen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2018 Feb 1;28(1):43-49. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx099.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckx099
PMID:29016786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5881753/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although increasing numbers of countries are implementing outdoor school ground smoking bans at secondary schools, less attention is paid to the post-implementation period even though sustainability of a policy is essential for long-term effectiveness. Therefore, this study assesses the level of sustainability and examines perceived barriers/facilitators related to the sustainability of an outdoor school ground smoking ban at secondary schools.

METHODS

A mixed-method design was used with a sequential explanatory approach. In phase I, 438 online surveys were conducted and in phase II, 15 semi-structured interviews were obtained from directors of relevant schools. ANOVA (phase I) and a thematic approach (phase II) were used to analyze data.

RESULTS

Level of sustainability of an outdoor school ground smoking ban was high at the 48% Dutch schools with an outdoor smoking ban. Furthermore, school size was significantly associated with sustainability. The perceived barriers/facilitators fell into three categories: (i) smoking ban implementation factors (side-effects, enforcement, communication, guidelines and collaboration), (ii) school factors (physical environment, school culture, education type and school policy) and (iii) community environment factors (legislation and social environment).

CONCLUSIONS

Internationally, the spread of outdoor school ground smoking bans could be further promoted. Once implemented, the ban has become 'normal' practice and investments tend to endure. Moreover, involvement of all staff is important for sustainability as they function as role models, have an interrelationship with students, and share responsibility for enforcement. These findings are promising for the sustainability of future tobacco control initiatives to further protect against the morbidity/mortality associated with smoking.

摘要

背景

尽管越来越多的国家在中学实施户外校园吸烟禁令,但对实施后的情况关注较少,尽管政策的可持续性对于长期有效性至关重要。因此,本研究评估了户外校园吸烟禁令的可持续性水平,并研究了与中学户外校园吸烟禁令可持续性相关的感知障碍/促进因素。

方法

采用混合方法设计,采用顺序解释方法。在第一阶段,进行了 438 次在线调查,在第二阶段,从相关学校的校长那里获得了 15 次半结构化访谈。使用 ANOVA(第一阶段)和主题方法(第二阶段)分析数据。

结果

在实施户外校园吸烟禁令的 48%的荷兰学校中,户外校园吸烟禁令的可持续性水平较高。此外,学校规模与可持续性显著相关。感知障碍/促进因素分为三类:(i)禁烟实施因素(副作用、执行、沟通、准则和合作)、(ii)学校因素(物理环境、学校文化、教育类型和学校政策)和(iii)社区环境因素(立法和社会环境)。

结论

在国际上,可以进一步推广户外校园吸烟禁令的实施。一旦实施,禁令就成为了“常态”做法,投资往往会持续下去。此外,所有员工的参与对于可持续性很重要,因为他们是榜样,与学生有相互关系,并共同负责执行。这些发现为未来的烟草控制倡议的可持续性提供了希望,以进一步防止与吸烟相关的发病率/死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28af/5881753/ae351137405f/ckx099f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28af/5881753/ae351137405f/ckx099f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28af/5881753/ae351137405f/ckx099f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Sustainability of outdoor school ground smoking bans at secondary schools: a mixed-method study.中学户外校园吸烟禁令的可持续性:一项混合方法研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2018 Feb 1;28(1):43-49. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx099.
2
Evaluation of the Process of Implementing an Outdoor School Ground Smoking Ban at Secondary Schools.评估中学室外操场禁烟令的实施过程。
J Sch Health. 2018 Nov;88(11):859-867. doi: 10.1111/josh.12692.
3
Schools as smoke-free zones? Barriers and facilitators to the adoption of outdoor school ground smoking bans at secondary schools.学校作为无烟区?中学实施户外校园禁烟的障碍与促进因素。
Tob Induc Dis. 2016 Mar 29;14:10. doi: 10.1186/s12971-016-0076-9. eCollection 2016.
4
Evaluation of the Implementation of a 25-Year Outdoor School Ground Smoking Ban: A Qualitative Interview Study With Implications for Prevention Practise.评价实施长达 25 年的户外学校禁烟令的效果:一项具有预防实践意义的定性访谈研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;9:628748. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.628748. eCollection 2021.
5
Results of outdoor smoking bans at secondary schools on adolescents smoking behaviour: a quasi-experimental study.室外吸烟禁令对中学生吸烟行为的影响:一项准实验研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2019 Aug 1;29(4):765-771. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky281.
6
Impact of an Outdoor Smoking Ban at Secondary Schools on Cigarettes, E-Cigarettes and Water Pipe Use among Adolescents: An 18-Month Follow-Up.中学室外禁烟对青少年吸烟、电子烟和水烟使用的影响:18 个月随访研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 25;15(2):205. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020205.
7
Why Secondary Schools Do Not Implement Far-Reaching Smoke-Free Policies: Exploring Deep Core, Policy Core, and Secondary Beliefs of School Staff in the Netherlands.为何中学未能推行深远的无烟政策:探究荷兰中学教职人员的深层核心、政策核心和次要信念。
Int J Behav Med. 2019 Dec;26(6):608-618. doi: 10.1007/s12529-019-09818-y.
8
Adolescent Smoking in Secondary Schools that Have Implemented Smoke-Free Policies: In-Depth Exploration of Shared Smoking Patterns.中学实施禁烟政策后青少年吸烟状况:共享吸烟模式的深入探讨。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 13;16(12):2100. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16122100.
9
Tobacco smoking policies in Australian alcohol and other drug treatment services, agreement between staff awareness and the written policy document.澳大利亚酒精及其他药物治疗服务中的吸烟政策,员工认知与书面政策文件之间的一致性。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 17;17(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3968-y.
10
'[…] the situation in the schools still remains the Achilles heel.' Barriers to the implementation of school tobacco policies-a qualitative study from local stakeholder's perspective in seven European cities.[...] 学校的情况仍然是阿喀琉斯之踵。 从七个欧洲城市的地方利益相关者的角度来看,实施学校烟草政策的障碍 - 一项定性研究。
Health Educ Res. 2020 Feb 1;35(1):32-43. doi: 10.1093/her/cyz037.

引用本文的文献

1
State of the literature discussing smoke-free policies globally: A narrative review.全球无烟政策文献综述:一篇叙述性综述
Tob Induc Dis. 2024 Jan 5;22. doi: 10.18332/tid/174781. eCollection 2024.
2
Fidelity, adaptation and integration of whole-school health promotion within Dutch schools: a cross-sectional survey study.在荷兰学校中进行的学校健康促进的忠实性、适应性和整合:一项横断面调查研究。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Dec 1;38(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad173.
3
A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial to Increase the Sustainment of an Indoor-Outdoor-Free-Play Program in Early Childhood Education and Care Services: A Study Protocol for the Sustaining Play, Sustaining Health (SPSH) Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Sustainability of the good behaviour game in Dutch primary schools.荷兰小学中“好行为游戏”的可持续性。
Health Promot Int. 2017 Feb 1;32(1):79-90. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dav055.
2
Schools as smoke-free zones? Barriers and facilitators to the adoption of outdoor school ground smoking bans at secondary schools.学校作为无烟区?中学实施户外校园禁烟的障碍与促进因素。
Tob Induc Dis. 2016 Mar 29;14:10. doi: 10.1186/s12971-016-0076-9. eCollection 2016.
3
The Effectiveness and Sustainability of a Universal School-Based Programme for Preventing Depression in Chinese Adolescents: A Follow-Up Study Using Quasi-Experimental Design.
一项增加幼儿教育和保育服务中室内外自由游戏计划持续性的试点随机对照试验:维持游戏,维持健康(SPSH)试验的研究方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 13;20(6):5043. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065043.
4
A systematic review of school health policy measurement tools: implementation determinants and outcomes.学校卫生政策测量工具的系统评价:实施决定因素与结果
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jun 26;2(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00169-y.
5
Barriers and facilitators influencing the sustainment of health behaviour interventions in schools and childcare services: a systematic review.影响学校和儿童保育服务中维持健康行为干预的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2021 Jun 12;16(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01134-y.
6
Evaluation of the Implementation of a 25-Year Outdoor School Ground Smoking Ban: A Qualitative Interview Study With Implications for Prevention Practise.评价实施长达 25 年的户外学校禁烟令的效果:一项具有预防实践意义的定性访谈研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;9:628748. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.628748. eCollection 2021.
7
Quantitative measures of health policy implementation determinants and outcomes: a systematic review.卫生政策实施决定因素及结果的定量评估:一项系统综述
Implement Sci. 2020 Jun 19;15(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01007-w.
8
The sustainability of public health interventions in schools: a systematic review.学校公共卫生干预措施的可持续性:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2020 Jan 6;15(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0961-8.
9
Understanding school staff members' enforcement of school tobacco policies to achieve tobacco-free school: a realist review.理解学校工作人员执行学校烟草政策以实现无烟学校:一个现实主义的综述。
Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 19;8(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1086-5.
10
Impact of an Outdoor Smoking Ban at Secondary Schools on Cigarettes, E-Cigarettes and Water Pipe Use among Adolescents: An 18-Month Follow-Up.中学室外禁烟对青少年吸烟、电子烟和水烟使用的影响:18 个月随访研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 25;15(2):205. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020205.
一项针对中国青少年预防抑郁症的全校性计划的有效性和可持续性:一项采用准实验设计的随访研究
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 26;11(2):e0149854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149854. eCollection 2016.
4
School smoking policies and educational inequalities in smoking behaviour of adolescents aged 14-17 years in Europe.学校吸烟政策与欧洲 14-17 岁青少年吸烟行为的教育不平等。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Feb;70(2):132-9. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-205831. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
5
Planning for Sustainability of an Evidence-Based Mental Health Promotion Program in Canadian Elementary Schools.加拿大小学基于证据的心理健康促进项目的可持续性规划。
Am J Community Psychol. 2015 Sep;56(1-2):120-33. doi: 10.1007/s10464-015-9737-8.
6
Association of campus tobacco policies with secondhand smoke exposure, intention to smoke on campus, and attitudes about outdoor smoking restrictions.校园烟草政策与二手烟暴露、在校园吸烟的意愿以及对户外吸烟限制的态度之间的关联。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Jun;105(6):1098-100. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302251. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
7
The Program Sustainability Assessment Tool: a new instrument for public health programs.项目可持续性评估工具:公共卫生项目的新工具。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Jan 23;11:130184. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.130184.
8
Factors influencing perceived sustainability of Dutch community health programs.影响荷兰社区健康项目可持续性认知的因素。
Health Promot Int. 2015 Sep;30(3):473-83. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dat059. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
9
Public health program capacity for sustainability: a new framework.公共卫生计划的可持续发展能力:一个新框架。
Implement Sci. 2013 Feb 1;8:15. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-15.
10
The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research.新计划和创新的可持续性:对实证文献的回顾和对未来研究的建议。
Implement Sci. 2012 Mar 14;7:17. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-17.