• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生与死的差别:非致命枪击案与枪杀命案中的受害者特征及动机

The Difference Between Living and Dying: Victim Characteristics and Motive Among Nonfatal Shootings and Gun Homicides.

作者信息

Hipple Natalie Kroovand, Magee Lauren A

出版信息

Violence Vict. 2017 Dec 1;32(6):977-997. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-16-00150. Epub 2017 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-16-00150
PMID:29017638
Abstract

Using both official and unofficial data sources, researchers examined nonfatal (n = 617) and fatal shooting (n = 159) victim characteristics over an 18-month period in Indianapolis. This research revealed that the typical shooting victim was male, non-White, almost 29 years old, had been arrested prior to inclusion in this study, and had been shot more than once. Interestingly, this research supports the notion that nonfatal shooting and homicide victims are different, especially as they relate to victim age, gunshot wound severity, and shooting motive. It highlights the need for better gun violence data collection beyond what currently exists. Striving for improved, more comprehensive cross-sector data collection has implications beyond just police policy and practice to include public health and prevention efforts.

摘要

研究人员利用官方和非官方数据源,对印第安纳波利斯18个月期间的非致命枪击案受害者(n = 617)和致命枪击案受害者(n = 159)的特征进行了调查。这项研究表明,典型的枪击案受害者为男性、非白人,年龄近29岁,在纳入本研究之前曾被逮捕,且不止一次中枪。有趣的是,这项研究支持了非致命枪击案受害者和凶杀案受害者不同的观点,尤其是在受害者年龄、枪伤严重程度和枪击动机方面。它凸显了除现有数据外,更好地收集枪支暴力数据的必要性。努力改进、更全面地收集跨部门数据,其影响不仅限于警方政策和实践,还包括公共卫生和预防工作。

相似文献

1
The Difference Between Living and Dying: Victim Characteristics and Motive Among Nonfatal Shootings and Gun Homicides.生与死的差别:非致命枪击案与枪杀命案中的受害者特征及动机
Violence Vict. 2017 Dec 1;32(6):977-997. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-16-00150. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
2
Factors associated with police shooting mortality: A focus on race and a plea for more comprehensive data.与警察枪击死亡率相关的因素:关注种族问题并呼吁获取更全面的数据。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 10;16(11):e0259024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259024. eCollection 2021.
3
Variation in Rates of Fatal Police Shootings across US States: the Role of Firearm Availability.美国各州致命警察枪击事件发生率的差异:枪支供应的作用。
J Urban Health. 2019 Feb;96(1):63-73. doi: 10.1007/s11524-018-0313-z.
4
The Association of Firearm Caliber With Likelihood of Death From Gunshot Injury in Criminal Assaults.枪支口径与刑事袭击中枪击致死概率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jul 6;1(3):e180833. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0833.
5
Towards a National Definition and Database for Nonfatal Shooting Incidents.制定全国范围内非致命枪击事件的定义和数据库。
J Urban Health. 2022 Jun;99(3):361-372. doi: 10.1007/s11524-022-00638-2. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
6
Victim Characteristics, Situational Factors, and the Lethality of Urban Gun Violence.城市枪支暴力的受害者特征、情境因素与致命性。
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Apr;34(8):1633-1656. doi: 10.1177/0886260516652264. Epub 2016 Jun 12.
7
A Typology of Civilians Shot and Killed by US Police: a Latent Class Analysis of Firearm Legal Intervention Homicide in the 2014-2015 National Violent Death Reporting System.美国警察枪杀平民的类型学:2014-2015 年国家暴力死亡报告系统中枪支法律干预杀人案的潜在类别分析。
J Urban Health. 2020 Jun;97(3):317-328. doi: 10.1007/s11524-020-00430-0.
8
Fatal Police Shootings of Victims with Mental Health Crises: A Descriptive Analysis of Data from the 2014-2015 National Violent Death Reporting System.患有精神健康危机的受害者被警方致命枪击:2014-2015 年国家暴力死亡报告系统数据的描述性分析。
J Urban Health. 2024 Apr;101(2):262-271. doi: 10.1007/s11524-024-00833-3. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
9
Australia's 1996 gun law reforms: faster falls in firearm deaths, firearm suicides, and a decade without mass shootings.澳大利亚1996年的枪支法律改革:枪支死亡人数、枪支自杀人数更快下降,且十年没有发生大规模枪击事件。
Inj Prev. 2006 Dec;12(6):365-72. doi: 10.1136/ip.2006.013714.
10
Situational and Victim Correlates of Increased Case Fatality Rates in Los Angeles Shootings, 2005-2021.2005年至2021年洛杉矶枪击案中病死率上升的情境及受害者相关因素
J Urban Health. 2024 Apr;101(2):272-279. doi: 10.1007/s11524-024-00845-z. Epub 2024 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology of fatal and nonfatal community firearm violence in New York City, 2019-2023.2019 - 2023年纽约市社区枪支暴力致死与非致死情况的流行病学研究
Inj Epidemiol. 2025 Aug 8;12(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40621-025-00590-0.
2
COVID-19 and Gun Violence: Keeping Unknown Shocks and Volatility in Perspective.新冠疫情与枪支暴力:正确看待未知的冲击和波动
Crim Justice Rev. 2023 Jun;48(2):145-167. doi: 10.1177/07340168221088571. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
3
Healthcare utilization and mental health outcomes among nonfatal shooting assault victims.
非致命枪击袭击受害者的医疗保健利用情况及心理健康结果。
Prev Med Rep. 2022 May 12;27:101824. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101824. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Towards a National Definition and Database for Nonfatal Shooting Incidents.制定全国范围内非致命枪击事件的定义和数据库。
J Urban Health. 2022 Jun;99(3):361-372. doi: 10.1007/s11524-022-00638-2. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
5
Non-fatal gun violence and community health behaviors: A neighborhood analysis in Philadelphia.非致命性枪支暴力与社区健康行为:费城的邻里分析
J Behav Med. 2021 Dec;44(6):833-841. doi: 10.1007/s10865-021-00232-y. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
6
Identifying nonfatal firearm assault incidents through linking police data and clinical records: Cohort study in Indianapolis, Indiana, 2007-2016.通过将警方数据与临床记录相联系来识别非致命性枪支攻击事件:印第安纳波利斯,印第安纳州,2007-2016 年的队列研究。
Prev Med. 2021 Aug;149:106605. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106605. Epub 2021 May 13.
7
Epidemiologic Trends in Fatal and Nonfatal Firearm Injuries in the US, 2009-2017.2009-2017 年美国致命和非致命枪支伤害的流行病学趋势。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Feb 1;181(2):237-244. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.6696.
8
Community-Level Social Processes and Firearm Shooting Events: A Multilevel Analysis.社区层面的社会进程与枪支射击事件:多层次分析。
J Urban Health. 2020 Apr;97(2):296-305. doi: 10.1007/s11524-020-00424-y.