Hussain Anwar, Mahmood Fahad, Teng Chui, Jafferbhoy Sadaf, Luke David, Tsiamis Achilleas
SpR Colorectal Surgery, Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital of North Midlands, UK.
Core Trainee General Surgery, Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital of North Midlands, UK.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Sep 28;23:21-24. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.09.013. eCollection 2017 Nov.
Emergency laparotomy is a commonly performed high-mortality surgical procedure. The National Emergency Laparotomy Network (NELA) published an average mortality rate of 11.1% and a median length of stay equivalent to 16.3 days in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. This study presents a completed audit loop after implementing the change of increasing the number of on-call surgeons in the general surgery rota of a university hospital. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of emergency laparotomy in a single UK tertiary centre after addition of one more consultant in the daily on-call rota.
This is a retrospective study involving patients who underwent emergency laparotomy between March to May 2013 (first audit) and June to August 2015 (second audit). The study parameters stayed the same. The adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy under the general surgical take were included. Appendicectomy, cholecystectomy and simple inguinal hernia repair patients were excluded. Data was collected on patient demographics, ASA, morbidity, 30-day mortality and length of hospital stay. Statistical analysis including logistic regression was performed using SPSS.
During the second 3-month period, 123 patients underwent laparotomy compared to 84 in the first audit. Median age was 65(23-93) years. 56.01% cases were ASA III or above in the re-audit compared to 41.9% in the initial audit. 38% patients had bowel anastomosis compared to 35.7% in the re-audit with 4.2% leak rate in the re-audit compared to 16.6% in the first audit. 30-day mortality was 10.50% in the re-audit compared to 21% and median length of hospital stay 11 days in the re-audit compared to 16 days. The lower ASA grade was significantly associated with increased likelihood of being alive, as was being female, younger age and not requiring ITU admission post-operatively. However, having a second on-call consultant was 2.231 times more likely to increase the chances of patients not dying (p = 0.031).
Our audit-loop suggests that adding a second consultant to the daily on-call rota significantly reduces postoperative mortality and morbidity. Age, ASA and ITU admission are other independent factors affecting patient outcomes. We suggest this change be applied to other high volume centres across the country to improve the outcomes after emergency laparotomy.
急诊剖腹手术是一种常见但死亡率较高的外科手术。国家急诊剖腹手术网络(NELA)公布的数据显示,接受急诊剖腹手术患者的平均死亡率为11.1%,中位住院时间相当于16.3天。本研究展示了一所大学医院普通外科值班表中增加值班外科医生数量这一变革实施后的完整审核循环。本研究的目的是评估在每日值班表中增加一名顾问医生后,英国一家三级中心急诊剖腹手术的结果。
这是一项回顾性研究,涉及2013年3月至5月(首次审核)和2015年6月至8月(第二次审核)期间接受急诊剖腹手术的患者。研究参数保持不变。纳入在普通外科值班期间接受急诊剖腹手术的成年患者。阑尾切除术、胆囊切除术和单纯腹股沟疝修补术患者被排除。收集了患者的人口统计学数据、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、发病率、30天死亡率和住院时间。使用SPSS进行包括逻辑回归在内的统计分析。
在第二个3个月期间,有123例患者接受了剖腹手术,而首次审核时有84例。中位年龄为65岁(23 - 93岁)。再次审核时56.01%的病例为ASA III级或以上,而初次审核时为41.9%。再次审核时有38%的患者进行了肠道吻合术,初次审核时为35.7%,再次审核时吻合口漏率为4.2%,初次审核时为16.6%。再次审核时30天死亡率为10.50%,初次审核时为21%,再次审核时中位住院时间为11天,初次审核时为16天。较低的ASA分级与存活可能性增加显著相关,女性、年龄较小以及术后不需要入住重症监护病房(ITU)的患者也是如此。然而,增加一名值班顾问医生使患者不死的几率增加2.231倍(p = = 0.031)。
我们的审核循环表明,在每日值班表中增加第二名顾问医生可显著降低术后死亡率和发病率。年龄、ASA分级和入住ITU是影响患者结局的其他独立因素。我们建议将这一变革应用于全国其他手术量大的中心,以改善急诊剖腹手术后的结局。