Rodriguez Y Baena Ruggero, D'Aquino Riccardo, Graziano Antonio, Trovato Letizia, Aloise Antonio C, Ceccarelli Gabriele, Cusella Gabriella, Pelegrine André A, Lupi Saturnino M
Department of Clinical Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Private Practice, Turin, Italy.
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2017 Sep 27;5:87. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2017.00087. eCollection 2017.
Sinus lift augmentation is a procedure required for the placement of a dental implant, whose success can be limited by the quantity or quality of available bone. To this purpose, the first aim of the current study was to evaluate the ability of autologous periosteum-derived micrografts and Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) supplemented with hydroxyl apatite (HA) to induce bone augmentation in the sinus lift procedure. Secondly, we compared the micrograft's behavior with respect to biomaterial alone, including Bio-Oss® and PLGA/HA, commercially named Alos. Sinus lift procedure was performed on 24 patients who required dental implants and who, according to the study design and procedure performed, were divided into three groups: group A (Alos + periosteum-derived micrografts); group B (Alos alone); and group C (Bio-Oss® alone). Briefly, in group A, a small piece of periosteum was collected from each patient and mechanically disaggregated by Rigenera® protocol using the Rigeneracons medical device. This protocol allowed for the obtainment of autologous micrografts, which in turn were used to soak the Alos scaffold. At 6 months after the sinus lift procedure and before the installation of dental implants, histological and radiographic evaluations in all three groups were performed. In group A, where sinus lift augmentation was performed using periosteum-derived micrografts and Alos, the bone regeneration was much faster than in the control groups where it was performed with Alos or Bio-Oss® alone (groups B and C, respectively). In addition, the radiographic evaluation in the patients of group A showed a radio-opacity after 4 months, while after 6 months, the prosthetic rehabilitation was improved and was maintained after 2 years post-surgery. In summary, we report on the efficacy of periosteum-derived micrografts and Alos to augment sinus lift in patients requiring dental implants. This efficacy is supported by an increased percentage of vital mineralized tisssue in the group treated with both periosteum-derived micrografts and Alos, with respect to the control group of Alos or Bio-Oss® alone, as confirmed by histological analysis and radiographic evaluations at 6 months from treatment.
上颌窦提升术是种植牙植入所需的一种手术,其成功率可能受到可用骨量或骨质量的限制。为此,本研究的首要目的是评估自体骨膜来源的微移植物以及添加了羟基磷灰石(HA)的聚乳酸-乙醇酸共聚物(PLGA)在鼻窦提升术中诱导骨增量的能力。其次,我们将微移植物与单独的生物材料的性能进行了比较,单独的生物材料包括Bio-Oss®和PLGA/HA(商品名为Alos)。对24名需要种植牙的患者进行了上颌窦提升术,根据研究设计和实施的手术,将患者分为三组:A组(Alos + 骨膜来源的微移植物);B组(仅Alos);C组(仅Bio-Oss®)。简要地说,在A组中,从每位患者身上采集一小片骨膜,并使用Rigeneracons医疗器械按照Rigenera®方案进行机械分解。该方案可获得自体微移植物,进而将其用于浸泡Alos支架。在鼻窦提升术后6个月且在安装种植牙之前,对所有三组进行了组织学和影像学评估。在A组中,使用骨膜来源的微移植物和Alos进行上颌窦提升术,其骨再生速度比仅使用Alos或Bio-Oss®的对照组(分别为B组和C组)快得多。此外,A组患者的影像学评估显示4个月后出现不透射线现象,而6个月后,修复效果得到改善,并在术后2年得以维持。总之,我们报告了骨膜来源的微移植物和Alos在需要种植牙的患者中增强上颌窦提升术的疗效。与仅使用Alos或Bio-Oss®的对照组相比,同时使用骨膜来源的微移植物和Alos治疗的组中,活性矿化组织的百分比增加,这支持了这种疗效,治疗后6个月的组织学分析和影像学评估证实了这一点。